• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罗兰·莫里斯问卷与基于偏好的通用测量方法之间的映射关系。

Mapping between the Roland Morris Questionnaire and generic preference-based measures.

作者信息

Khan Kamran A, Madan Jason, Petrou Stavros, Lamb Sarah E

机构信息

Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

出版信息

Value Health. 2014 Sep;17(6):686-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.07.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2014.07.001
PMID:25236992
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Roland Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a widely used health status measure for low back pain (LBP). It is not preference-based, and there are currently no established algorithms for mapping between the RMQ and preference-based health-related quality-of-life measures. Using data from randomized controlled trials of treatment for LBP, we sought to develop algorithms for mapping between RMQ scores and health utilities derived using either the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) or the six-dimensional health state short form (derived from Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey) (SF-6D).

METHODS

This study is based on data from the Back Skills Training Trial in which data were collected from 701 patients at baseline and subsequently at 3, 6, and 12 months postrandomization using a range of outcome measures, including the RMQ, the EQ-5D, and the Short Form 12 item Health Survey (SF-12) (from which SF-6D utilities can be derived). We used baseline trial data to estimate models using both direct and response mapping approaches to predict EQ-5D and SF-6D health utilities and dimension responses. A multistage model selection process was used to assess the predictive accuracy of the models. We then explored different techniques and mapping models that made use of repeated follow-up observations in the data. The estimated mapping algorithms were validated using external data from the UK Back Pain Exercise and Manipulation trial.

RESULTS

A number of models were developed that accurately predict health utilities in this context. The best performing model for RMQ to EQ-5D mapping was a beta regression with Bayesian quasi-likelihood estimation that included 24 dummy variables for RMQ responses, age, and sex as covariates (mean squared error 0.0380) based on repeated data. The model selected for RMQ to SF-6D mapping was a finite mixture model that included the overall RMQ score, age, sex, RMQ score squared, age squared, and an interaction term for age and RMQ score as covariates (mean squared error 0.0114) based on repeated data.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to reasonably predict EQ-5D and SF-6D health utilities from RMQ scores and responses using regression methods. Our regression equations provide an empirical basis for estimating health utilities when EQ-5D or SF-6D data are not available. They can be used to inform future economic evaluations of interventions targeting LBP.

摘要

目的

罗兰·莫里斯问卷(RMQ)是一种广泛用于评估腰痛(LBP)健康状况的工具。它并非基于偏好,目前也没有既定的算法可用于在RMQ与基于偏好的健康相关生活质量测量工具之间进行转换。利用腰痛治疗随机对照试验的数据,我们试图开发算法,以实现RMQ评分与使用欧洲五维健康量表(EQ - 5D)或六维健康状态简表(源自医学结局研究36项简短健康调查)(SF - 6D)得出的健康效用值之间的转换。

方法

本研究基于背部技能训练试验的数据,该试验从701名患者基线时开始收集数据,随后在随机分组后的3个月、6个月和12个月使用一系列结局测量工具进行数据收集,包括RMQ、EQ - 5D和12项简短健康调查(SF - 12)(可从中得出SF - 6D效用值)。我们使用试验基线数据,通过直接和响应映射方法估计模型,以预测EQ - 5D和SF - 6D健康效用值及维度响应。采用多阶段模型选择过程评估模型的预测准确性。然后,我们探索了利用数据中重复随访观察结果的不同技术和映射模型。使用来自英国腰痛运动与手法治疗试验的外部数据对估计的映射算法进行验证。

结果

在此背景下开发了多个能准确预测健康效用值的模型。对于RMQ到EQ - 5D映射,表现最佳的模型是采用贝叶斯拟似然估计的贝塔回归模型,该模型将RMQ响应的24个虚拟变量、年龄和性别作为协变量(基于重复数据的均方误差为0.0380)。为RMQ到SF - 6D映射选择的模型是一个有限混合模型,该模型将RMQ总分、年龄、性别、RMQ评分的平方、年龄的平方以及年龄与RMQ评分的交互项作为协变量(基于重复数据的均方误差为0.0114)。

结论

使用回归方法可以根据RMQ评分和响应合理预测EQ - 5D和SF - 6D健康效用值。我们的回归方程为在没有EQ - 5D或SF - 6D数据时估计健康效用值提供了实证依据。它们可用于为未来针对腰痛的干预措施的经济评估提供参考。

相似文献

1
Mapping between the Roland Morris Questionnaire and generic preference-based measures.罗兰·莫里斯问卷与基于偏好的通用测量方法之间的映射关系。
Value Health. 2014 Sep;17(6):686-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.07.001.
2
Can Mapping Algorithms Based on Raw Scores Overestimate QALYs Gained by Treatment? A Comparison of Mappings Between the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the EQ-5D-3L Based on Raw and Differenced Score Data.基于原始分数的映射算法会高估治疗所获得的质量调整生命年吗?基于原始分数和差分分数数据对罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷与EQ-5D-3L之间映射的比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 May;35(5):549-559. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0483-z.
3
Differential Psychometric Properties of EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level and Short-Form 6-Dimension Utility Measures in Low Back Pain.《腰痛患者欧洲五维健康量表 5 维度 5 水平版与六维度简短量表效用测量的差异心理测量学特性》
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jun 1;44(11):E679-E686. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002939.
4
Does Selecting Covariates Using Factor Analysis in Mapping Algorithms Improve Predictive Accuracy? A Case of Predicting EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D Utilities from the Women's Health Questionnaire.采用因子分析选择协变量是否会提高映射算法的预测准确性?从妇女健康问卷预测 EQ-5D-5L 和 SF-6D 效用值的案例。
Value Health. 2018 Oct;21(10):1205-1217. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.020. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
5
Mapping between headache specific and generic preference-based health-related quality of life measures.头痛特异性和通用型偏好健康相关生活质量测量之间的映射。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Oct 26;22(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01762-y.
6
A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5 L and SF-6D in Chinese patients with low back pain.中文腰痛患者 EQ-5D-5L 与 SF-6D 的头对头比较。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Apr 11;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1137-6.
7
Mapping the FACT-G cancer-specific quality of life instrument to the EQ-5D and SF-6D.将 FACT-G 癌症特异性生活质量量表映射到 EQ-5D 和 SF-6D 上。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Dec 1;11:203. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-203.
8
Using the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale to estimate health state utility values: mapping from the MSIS-29, version 2, to the EQ-5D and the SF-6D.使用多发性硬化症影响量表来估算健康状态效用值:从 MSIS-29 版本 2 到 EQ-5D 和 SF-6D 的映射。
Value Health. 2012 Dec;15(8):1084-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Nov 4.
9
Testing alternative regression models to predict utilities: mapping the QLQ-C30 onto the EQ-5D-5L and the SF-6D.测试替代回归模型以预测效用值:将 QLQ-C30 映射到 EQ-5D-5L 和 SF-6D 上。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Nov;27(11):2823-2839. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1981-6. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
10
Direct and Indirect Mapping of Assessment of Quality of Life - 6 Dimensions (AQoL-6D) Onto EQ-5D-5L Utilities Using Data From a Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Study of Malaysians With Chronic Heart Failure.直接和间接映射评估生命质量 - 6 维度(AQoL-6D)到 EQ-5D-5L 效用,使用来自马来西亚慢性心力衰竭患者的多中心、横断面研究的数据。
Value Health. 2024 Dec;27(12):1762-1770. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.07.016. Epub 2024 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of mapping algorithms for gastric cancer: translating EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-STO22 to EQ-5D-5L health utilities.胃癌映射算法的开发:将欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C30和QLQ-STO22转化为EQ-5D-5L健康效用值。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Sep 13. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04063-1.
2
Mapping between headache specific and generic preference-based health-related quality of life measures.头痛特异性和通用型偏好健康相关生活质量测量之间的映射。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Oct 26;22(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01762-y.
3
Mapping clinical outcomes to generic preference-based outcome measures: development and comparison of methods.
将临床结局映射到通用偏好为基础的结局测量指标:方法的制定与比较。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(34):1-68. doi: 10.3310/hta24340.
4
Health-related quality of life and health utilities in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: the impact of related comorbidities/complications.胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的健康相关生活质量和健康效用:相关合并症/并发症的影响。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Jul;21(5):729-743. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01167-y. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
5
An App-Delivered Self-Management Program for People With Low Back Pain: Protocol for the selfBACK Randomized Controlled Trial.一项针对腰痛患者的应用程序提供的自我管理计划:selfBACK随机对照试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Dec 3;8(12):e14720. doi: 10.2196/14720.
6
Mapping the kidney disease quality of life 36-item short form survey (KDQOL-36) to the EQ-5D-3L and the EQ-5D-5L in patients undergoing dialysis.将肾脏病生活质量 36 项简明量表(KDQOL-36)映射到透析患者的 EQ-5D-3L 和 EQ-5D-5L。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Nov;20(8):1195-1206. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01088-5. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
7
Mapping MOS-HIV to HUI3 and EQ-5D-3L in Patients With HIV.在HIV患者中对MOS-HIV与HUI3和EQ-5D-3L进行映射分析。
MDM Policy Pract. 2017 Jul 3;2(2):2381468317716440. doi: 10.1177/2381468317716440. eCollection 2017 Jul-Dec.
8
Development of Methods for the Mapping of Utilities Using Mixture Models: Mapping the AQLQ-S to the EQ-5D-5L and the HUI3 in Patients with Asthma.利用混合模型进行实用工具映射方法的开发:将 AQLQ-S 映射到哮喘患者的 EQ-5D-5L 和 HUI3。
Value Health. 2018 Jun;21(6):748-757. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.09.017. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
9
Predicting health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5 L) and capability wellbeing (ICECAP-A) in the context of opiate dependence using routine clinical outcome measures: CORE-OM, LDQ and TOP.运用常规临床结局评估工具(CORE-OM、LDQ 和 TOP)预测阿片类药物依赖患者的健康相关生活质量(EQ-5D-5L)和能力幸福感(ICECAP-A)
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 May 30;16(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0926-7.
10
Review and critical appraisal of studies mapping from quality of life or clinical measures to EQ-5D: an online database and application of the MAPS statement.回顾和评价将生活质量或临床指标映射到 EQ-5D 的研究:一个在线数据库和 MAPS 声明的应用。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Feb 12;16(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0857-3.