Nakagawa Hiroshi, Onuma Takehide
1 Chief Director, Sendai Emergency Medical Service Foundation, Miyagi, Japan (
2 Chief Doctor, Sendai-hokubu Emergency Medical Care Clinic.
Japan Med Assoc J. 2012 Jul;55(4):312-8.
During the 2009 A/H1N1 influenza pandemic in Sendai, two primary emergency clinics, which are after-hours emergency centers managed by the Sendai Emergency Medical Service Foundation, were inundated with many influenza patients. In the course of the pandemic, from August 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010, a total of 47,831 internal medicine and pediatric patients visited the two clinics and rapid influenza tests were performed in 17,167 of patients, in which 6,697 patients tested A-positive. Consequently, 10,743 patients were diagnosed with influenza, which included 1,447 patients that tested negative, and 2,599 patients that were not tested. Prior to the physicians check up, nurses performed triage and divided the patients into two groups, isolated and non-isolated. We examined the effect of triage, using the results of the rapid influenza test and antiviral drug administration, in each of the early, middle and maximum pandemic phases. Triage was considered effective in the early and middle phases, where the average number of influenza patients that visited the clinic per day were 21.4 and 50.6, respectively. But in the maximum phase where the average number of influenza patients soared to 275.3 per day, one out of three patients in the non-isolated group was clinically diagnosed as influenza. We were unable to separate influenza patients effectively in the maximum phase of pandemic.
在2009年仙台甲型H1N1流感大流行期间,仙台紧急医疗服务基金会管理的两家非工作时间紧急中心——初级紧急诊所,接待了大量流感患者。在大流行期间,从2009年8月1日至2010年3月31日,共有47831名内科和儿科患者前往这两家诊所就诊,其中17167名患者进行了快速流感检测,检测结果呈甲型阳性的患者有6697名。最终,10743名患者被诊断为流感,其中包括1447名检测结果为阴性的患者以及2599名未接受检测的患者。在医生检查之前,护士进行了分诊,将患者分为隔离组和非隔离组。我们利用快速流感检测结果和抗病毒药物使用情况,研究了在大流行的早期、中期和高峰期分诊的效果。分诊在早期和中期被认为是有效的,这两个阶段每天前往诊所的流感患者平均人数分别为21.4人和50.6人。但在高峰期,每天前往诊所的流感患者平均人数飙升至275.3人,非隔离组中每三名患者就有一名被临床诊断为流感。在大流行高峰期,我们无法有效地甄别出流感患者。