Department of Sociology, University of Missouri, United States.
Department of Sociology, Bowling Green State University, United States.
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Nov;120:118-25. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.015. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
We use data from Waves 1 and 2 of the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey to examine the effects of neighborhood immigrant concentration, race-ethnicity, nativity, and perceived cohesion on self-rated physical health. We limit our sample to adults whose addresses do not change between waves in order to explore neighborhood effects. Foreign-born Latinos were significantly less likely to report fair or poor health than African Americans and U.S.-born whites, but did not differ from U.S.-born Latinos. The main effect of immigrant concentration was not significant, but it interacted with nativity status to predict health: U.S.-born Latinos benefited more from neighborhood immigrant concentration than foreign-born Latinos. Perceived cohesion predicted health but immigrant concentration did not moderate the effect. Finally, U.S.-born Latinos differed from others in the way cohesion is associated with their health. Results are discussed within the framework of the epidemiological paradox.
我们利用洛杉矶家庭和社区调查的第 1 波和第 2 波数据,研究了邻里移民集中程度、种族-族裔、出生地和感知凝聚力对自感身体健康的影响。为了探索邻里效应,我们将样本限制在地址在两波调查中不变的成年人。与非裔美国人和美国出生的白人相比,拉美裔移民的自感健康状况较差的比例显著较低,但与美国出生的拉美裔移民没有差异。移民集中程度的主要影响不显著,但与出生地状态相互作用,从而对健康产生影响:与外国出生的拉美裔移民相比,美国出生的拉美裔移民从邻里移民集中程度中受益更多。感知凝聚力预测健康,但移民集中程度并没有调节这种影响。最后,在凝聚力与他们健康的关系方面,美国出生的拉美裔移民与其他人不同。结果在流行病学悖论的框架内进行了讨论。