Smith Lindsey P, Ng Shu Wen, Popkin Barry M
Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, CB#8120, 137 E. Franklin St., Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.
Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, CB#8120, 137 E. Franklin St., Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Nov;120:126-34. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
Physical activity and inactivity have distinct cardio-metabolic consequences, suggesting that combinations of activities can impact health above and beyond the effects of a single activity. However, little work has examined patterns of non-labor market time activity in the US population, particularly among full-time employees in sedentary occupations, who are at increased risk of adverse health consequences associated with a sedentary lifestyle. Identification of these patterns, and how they are related to total physical activity levels, is important for developing effective, attainable physical activity recommendations among sedentary employees, who typically have less time available for exercise. This is especially the case for low-income employees who face the highest time and financial barriers to achieving physical activity goals. This study uses cluster analysis to examine patterns of non-labor market time use among full-time (≥40 h/week) employed adults in sedentary occupations (<3 MET-h) on working days in the American Time Use Study. We then examine whether these patterns are associated with higher likelihood of meeting physical activity recommendations and higher overall physical activity (MET-h). We find that non-labor market time use patterns include those characterized by screen activities, housework, caregiving, sedentary leisure, and exercise. For both genders, the screen pattern was the most common and increased from 2003 to 2012, while the exercise pattern was infrequent and consistent across time. Screen, sedentary leisure, and community patterns were associated with lower likelihoods of meeting physical activity recommendations, suggesting that interventions targeting screen time may miss opportunities to improve physical activity among similarly sedentary groups. Alternately, non-labor market time use patterns characterized by housework and caregiving represented feasible avenues for increasing overall physical activity levels, especially for those with low financial and time resources. Consideration of non-labor market time use patterns may improve strategies to increase physical activity and decrease inactivity among full-time employed adults in sedentary jobs.
体力活动和缺乏体力活动会产生截然不同的心肺代谢后果,这表明多种活动的组合对健康的影响可能超过单一活动的效果。然而,在美国人群中,很少有研究探讨非劳动力市场时间活动模式,尤其是久坐职业的全职员工,他们面临与久坐生活方式相关的不良健康后果的风险更高。识别这些模式以及它们与总体体力活动水平的关系,对于为久坐员工制定有效、可行的体力活动建议非常重要,因为这些员工通常用于锻炼的时间较少。对于那些在实现体力活动目标方面面临最大时间和经济障碍的低收入员工来说尤其如此。本研究使用聚类分析来研究美国时间使用调查中久坐职业(<3代谢当量小时)的全职(每周≥40小时)在职成年人在工作日的非劳动力市场时间使用模式。然后,我们研究这些模式是否与达到体力活动建议的更高可能性以及更高的总体体力活动(代谢当量小时)相关。我们发现,非劳动力市场时间使用模式包括以屏幕活动、家务、照顾、久坐休闲和锻炼为特征的模式。对于男性和女性来说,屏幕模式最为常见,并且从2003年到2012年有所增加,而锻炼模式很少见且随时间保持一致。屏幕、久坐休闲和社交模式与达到体力活动建议的可能性较低相关,这表明针对屏幕时间进行干预可能会错过改善类似久坐群体体力活动的机会。相反,以家务和照顾为特征的非劳动力市场时间使用模式是提高总体体力活动水平的可行途径,特别是对于那些经济和时间资源有限的人。考虑非劳动力市场时间使用模式可能会改善增加久坐工作的全职成年人的体力活动和减少缺乏体力活动的策略。