Ahn Ji-Hyun, Kwon Oh-Jin, Nam Tae-Seok
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Gyeonggi-do.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hyun-Myoung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Arthroscopy. 2015 Jan;31(1):92-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.029. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients after arthroscopic repair of meniscal horizontal tears with a marrow-stimulating technique through clinical signs and second-look arthroscopy.
We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 32 meniscal repairs with horizontal cleavage tears and evaluated them through clinical assessment and second-look arthroscopic examinations. Arthroscopic meniscal repair and a marrow-stimulating technique were performed. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, Lysholm knee scoring scale, and Tegner activity scale. Assessment of meniscal healing was evaluated clinically by the presence of meniscal signs; second-look arthroscopy was performed in 11 patients. Correlation between chronicity of a meniscal lesion (time from initial symptom [TFIS]) and meniscal healing was evaluated.
The mean follow-up period was 45.6 ± 13.9 months. Improvements in mean VAS scores from 6.7 to 1.9 (P < .001) were observed. The Lysholm score increased from 48.0 ± 14.4 to 92.0 ± 6.3 (P < .001). The Tegner activity score increased from 3.3 ± 1.1 to 6.8 ± 0.8 (P < .001). At the last follow-up, 29 of 32 patients (91%) were evaluated as healing in the clinical assessment. Of the 11 patients who underwent second-look arthroscopy, 8 (73%) showed complete healing, 2 (18%) had incomplete healing, and 1 (9%) failed to heal. Correlation between TFIS and meniscal healing was clinically significant (P = .001) but arthroscopically insignificant (P = .085) on second-look arthroscopy.
The meniscal repair procedure for horizontal cleavage tears in the present study suggests an alternative treatment option to approach the treatment of meniscal tears extending into the avascular zone and degenerative tissue. The marrow-stimulating technique using a cannulated reamer can be considered as an alternative method for the augmentation of meniscal healing.
Level IV, therapeutic case series.
本研究旨在通过临床体征和二次关节镜检查,评估采用骨髓刺激技术进行关节镜下半月板水平撕裂修复术后的患者情况。
我们回顾性分析了连续32例半月板水平劈裂撕裂修复病例,并通过临床评估和二次关节镜检查进行评估。实施了关节镜下半月板修复及骨髓刺激技术。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分、Lysholm膝关节评分量表和Tegner活动量表评估功能结果。通过半月板体征的存在情况进行半月板愈合的临床评估;11例患者接受了二次关节镜检查。评估半月板损伤的慢性程度(从初始症状出现的时间[TFIS])与半月板愈合之间的相关性。
平均随访期为45.6±13.9个月。观察到平均VAS评分从6.7改善至1.9(P<.001)。Lysholm评分从48.0±14.4增加至92.0±6.3(P<.001)。Tegner活动评分从3.3±1.1增加至6.8±0.8(P<.001)。在最后一次随访时,32例患者中有29例(91%)在临床评估中被评估为愈合。在接受二次关节镜检查的11例患者中,8例(约73%)显示完全愈合,2例(18%)愈合不完全,1例(9%)未愈合。在二次关节镜检查中,TFIS与半月板愈合之间的相关性在临床上具有显著意义(P=.001),但在关节镜检查方面无显著意义(P=.085)。
本研究中针对半月板水平劈裂撕裂的半月板修复手术提示了一种替代治疗选择,用于处理延伸至无血管区和退变组织的半月板撕裂。使用空心铰刀的骨髓刺激技术可被视为促进半月板愈合的一种替代方法。
IV级,治疗性病例系列。