Demir Ibrahim Halil, Karslı Burcin
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, T.C. Ministry of Health Gaziantep City Hospital, 27470 Gaziantep, Turkey.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, 27310 Gaziantep, Turkey.
Indian J Orthop. 2024 Apr 15;58(5):527-534. doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01135-1. eCollection 2024 May.
Preserving and restoring meniscus function is crucial for maintaining knee biomechanics and overall functionality. To enhance the healing process after meniscus repair, various biological techniques have been introduced. In this study, three treatment approaches examined were bone marrow venting with stem cells (BMVP), anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with meniscus repair, and isolated meniscus repair.
From 2015 to 2019, we retrospectively analyzed data from 83 patients who presented with complaints of knee pain or pain in addition to instability, were diagnosed with vertical/longitudinal meniscus tears, and underwent arthroscopic repair (30 with isolated repair, 28 with ACLR repair, and 25 with BMVP) at our University Hospital. Among the 28 patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture, pain and instability were the predominant complaints, whereas 55 patients with meniscus tear primarily complained pain. Clinical and functional conditions were assessed using Lysholm, WOMAC, IKDC, and VAS scores before and 18 months after surgery. Surgical success was evaluated based on Barrett's criteria. Causes of failure were analyzed considering demographic data, smoking status, injury time, tear location, shape, zone, and suture type and number.
Of the participants, 58 were male, 25 were female, 61 had medial meniscus lesions, and 22 had lateral meniscus lesions. The tear types included 51 simple longitudinal tears, 18 bucket handle tears, and 14 complex tears. A significant improvement was observed in the postoperative 18 month Lysholm, WOMAC, and IKDC values in all three groups (: 0.001). At the 18 month mark, clinical and functional outcomes were comparable between BMVP and ACLR repair groups (Lysholm : 0.951, WOMAC : 0.241, IKDC : 0.984). Both of these procedures yielded better results compared to isolated meniscus repair (Lysholm : 0.001, WOMAC : 0.027, IKDC : 0.001).
The superior clinical and functional outcomes observed after meniscus repair with BMVP and ACLR, compared to isolated meniscus repair, indicate positive effects of bone marrow stem cells, blood components, and tissue healing factors on meniscus repair and knee function.
保留和恢复半月板功能对于维持膝关节生物力学和整体功能至关重要。为了加强半月板修复后的愈合过程,已引入了各种生物学技术。在本研究中,所考察的三种治疗方法分别是带干细胞的骨髓减压术(BMVP)、半月板修复联合前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)以及单纯半月板修复术。
从2015年至2019年,我们回顾性分析了83例患者的数据,这些患者主诉膝关节疼痛或除不稳定外还伴有疼痛,被诊断为垂直/纵向半月板撕裂,并在我们大学医院接受了关节镜修复手术(30例单纯修复,28例ACLR修复,25例BMVP)。在28例前交叉韧带断裂患者中,疼痛和不稳定是主要主诉,而55例半月板撕裂患者主要主诉疼痛。在手术前及术后18个月,使用Lysholm、WOMAC、IKDC和VAS评分评估临床和功能状况。根据巴雷特标准评估手术成功率。考虑人口统计学数据、吸烟状况、损伤时间、撕裂部位、形状、区域以及缝合类型和数量,分析失败原因。
参与者中,58例为男性,25例为女性,61例有内侧半月板损伤,22例有外侧半月板损伤。撕裂类型包括51例单纯纵向撕裂、18例桶柄状撕裂和14例复杂撕裂。所有三组术后18个月的Lysholm、WOMAC和IKDC值均有显著改善(P<0.001)。在18个月时,BMVP和ACLR修复组的临床和功能结果相当(Lysholm:P = 0.951,WOMAC:P = 0.241,IKDC:P = 0.984)。与单纯半月板修复相比,这两种手术均产生了更好的结果(Lysholm:P<0.001,WOMAC:P = 0.027,IKDC:P<0.001)。
与单纯半月板修复相比,BMVP和ACLR半月板修复术后观察到的更好的临床和功能结果表明,骨髓干细胞、血液成分和组织愈合因子对半月板修复和膝关节功能有积极影响。