Fontana M, Platt J A, Eckert G J, González-Cabezas C, Yoder K, Zero D T, Ando M, Soto-Rojas A E, Peters M C
Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences, and Endodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
J Dent Res. 2014 Nov;93(11):1070-5. doi: 10.1177/0022034514551753. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
Although there is strong evidence for the effectiveness of sealants, one major barrier in sealant utilization is the concern of sealing over active caries lesions. This study evaluated detection and monitoring of caries lesions through a clear sealant over 44 mo. Sixty-four 7- to 10-year-old children with at least 2 permanent molars with International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) scores 0-4 (and caries less than halfway through the dentin, radiographically) were examined with ICDAS, DIAGNOdent, and quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) before sealant placement and 1, 12, 24, and 44 mo (except QLF) after. Bitewing radiographs were taken yearly. DIAGNOdent and QLF were able to distinguish between baseline ICDAS before and after sealant placement. There was no significant evidence of ICDAS progression at 12 mo, but there was small evidence of minor increases at 24 and 44 mo (14% and 14%, respectively) with only 2% ICDAS ≥ 5. Additionally, there was little evidence of radiographic progression (at 12 mo = 1%, 24 mo = 3%, and 44 mo = 9%). Sealant retention rates were excellent at 12 mo = 89%, 24 mo = 78%, and 44 mo = 70%. The small risk of sealant repair increased significantly as baseline ICDAS, DIAGNOdent, and QLF values increased. However, regardless of lesion severity, sealants were 100% effective at 12 mo and 98% effective over 44 mo in managing occlusal surfaces at ICDAS 0-4 (i.e., only 4 of 228 teeth progressed to ICDAS ≥ 5 associated with sealants in need of repair and none to halfway or more through the dentin, radiographically). This study suggests that occlusal surfaces without frank cavitation (ICDAS 0-4) that are sealed with a clear sealant can be monitored with ICDAS, QLF, or DIAGNOdent, which may aid in predicting the need for sealant repair.
尽管有强有力的证据表明窝沟封闭剂有效,但窝沟封闭剂使用中的一个主要障碍是对覆盖活动性龋损的担忧。本研究通过使用透明窝沟封闭剂,在44个月的时间里评估了龋损的检测和监测情况。对64名7至10岁的儿童进行了检查,这些儿童至少有2颗恒磨牙,其国际龋病检测与评估系统(ICDAS)评分为0至4分(且在X线片上龋损未超过牙本质厚度的一半),在放置窝沟封闭剂前以及放置后1、12、24和44个月(定量光诱导荧光(QLF)检查除外),分别使用ICDAS、DIAGNOdent和定量光诱导荧光(QLF)进行检查。每年拍摄咬合翼片。DIAGNOdent和QLF能够区分放置窝沟封闭剂前后的基线ICDAS情况。在12个月时没有明显的ICDAS进展证据,但在24个月和44个月时有少量轻微增加的证据(分别为14%和14%),只有2%的ICDAS≥5。此外,X线片显示进展的证据也很少(12个月时为1%,24个月时为3%,44个月时为9%)。窝沟封闭剂的保留率在12个月时为89%,24个月时为78%,44个月时为70%,效果良好。随着基线ICDAS、DIAGNOdent和QLF值的增加,窝沟封闭剂修复的小风险显著增加。然而,无论病损严重程度如何,窝沟封闭剂在12个月时对ICDAS 0至4级的咬合面管理100%有效,在44个月时98%有效(即228颗牙齿中只有4颗进展到ICDAS≥5级,需要进行窝沟封闭剂修复,且在X线片上没有一颗进展到牙本质厚度的一半或更深)。本研究表明,对于未出现明显龋洞(ICDAS 0至4级)且用透明窝沟封闭剂封闭的咬合面,可以使用ICDAS、QLF或DIAGNOdent进行监测,这可能有助于预测窝沟封闭剂修复的需求。