Burd Christin E, Liu Wenjin, Huynh Minh V, Waqas Meriam A, Gillahan James E, Clark Kelly S, Fu Kailing, Martin Brit L, Jeck William R, Souroullas George P, Darr David B, Zedek Daniel C, Miley Michael J, Baguley Bruce C, Campbell Sharon L, Sharpless Norman E
Department of Molecular Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. The Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Cancer Discov. 2014 Dec;4(12):1418-29. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0729. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
NRAS mutation at codons 12, 13, or 61 is associated with transformation; yet, in melanoma, such alterations are nearly exclusive to codon 61. Here, we compared the melanoma susceptibility of an NrasQ61R knock-in allele to similarly designed KrasG12D and NrasG12D alleles. With concomitant p16INK4a inactivation, KrasG12D or NrasQ61R expression efficiently promoted melanoma in vivo, whereas NrasG12D did not. In addition, NrasQ61R mutation potently cooperated with Lkb1/Stk11 loss to induce highly metastatic disease. Functional comparisons of NrasQ61R and NrasG12D revealed little difference in the ability of these proteins to engage PI3K or RAF. Instead, NrasQ61R showed enhanced nucleotide binding, decreased intrinsic GTPase activity, and increased stability when compared with NrasG12D. This work identifies a faithful model of human NRAS-mutant melanoma, and suggests that the increased melanomagenecity of NrasQ61R over NrasG12D is due to heightened abundance of the active, GTP-bound form rather than differences in the engagement of downstream effector pathways.
This work explains the curious predominance in human melanoma of mutations of codon 61 of NRAS over other oncogenic NRAS mutations. Using conditional "knock-in" mouse models, we show that physiologic expression of NRASQ61R, but not NRASG12D, drives melanoma formation.
NRAS基因第12、13或61密码子的突变与肿瘤转化相关;然而,在黑色素瘤中,这种改变几乎只发生在第61密码子。在此,我们比较了NrasQ61R敲入等位基因与设计类似的KrasG12D和NrasG12D等位基因对黑色素瘤的易感性。伴随p16INK4a失活,KrasG12D或NrasQ61R的表达在体内有效促进黑色素瘤形成,而NrasG12D则不然。此外,NrasQ61R突变与Lkb1/Stk11缺失有效协同作用,诱导高度转移性疾病。NrasQ61R和NrasG12D的功能比较显示,这些蛋白与PI3K或RAF结合的能力差异不大。相反,与NrasG12D相比,NrasQ61R显示出增强的核苷酸结合能力、降低的内在GTP酶活性和更高的稳定性。这项工作确定了一种忠实的人类NRAS突变型黑色素瘤模型,并表明NrasQ61R比NrasG12D黑色素生成能力增强是由于活性GTP结合形式的丰度增加,而非下游效应通路结合的差异。
这项工作解释了NRAS基因第61密码子突变在人类黑色素瘤中相对于其他致癌NRAS突变的奇怪优势。使用条件性“敲入”小鼠模型,我们表明NRASQ61R而非NRASG12D的生理表达驱动黑色素瘤形成。