Suppr超能文献

在金黄色葡萄球菌中心静脉导管相关血流感染的情况下,使用米诺环素-利福平涂层中心静脉导管进行导管置换。

The use of minocycline-rifampin coated central venous catheters for exchange of catheters in the setting of staphylococcus aureus central line associated bloodstream infections.

作者信息

Chaftari Anne-Marie, El Zakhem Aline, Jamal Mohamed A, Jiang Ying, Hachem Ray, Raad Issam

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control, and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1460, 1515 Holcombe Blvd,, TX 77030 Houston, Texas.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Sep 24;14:518. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-518.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Central venous catheters (CVC) removal and reinsertion of a new CVC in the setting of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) is not always possible in septic patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with Staphylococcus aureus-CLABSI (SA-CLABSI) who had their CVCs exchanged over guidewire for minocycline/rifampin-coated (M/R)-CVC within seven days of bacteremia.

METHODS

Each case was matched with two control patients who had SA-CLABSI and had their CVC removed within seven days and two control patients who had their CVC retained beyond seven days. In addition, an in vitro model was developed for exchange of catheters.

RESULTS

We identified 40 patients with SA-CLABSI. Eight patients had their CVC exchanged over guidewire with M/R-CVC and were compared to 16 patients who had their CVC removed and 16 other patients who had their CVC retained. Patients who had their CVC exchanged over guidewire had a similar clinical response and relapse rates compared to patients whose CVC was removed or retained. However the rate of overall mortality was higher in patients who retained their CVC compared to those whose CVC was exchanged or removed (p = 0.034). The in vitro catheter exchange model showed that catheter exchange over guidewire using M/R-CVC completely prevented biofilm colonization compared to exchange using uncoated CVC (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of SA-CLABSI, exchanging the CVC over guidewire with M/R-CVC could be an alternative to removing the CVC and reinserting another CVC at a different site and may be associated with a lower rate of overall mortality. Further large prospective randomized clinical trials are warranted.

摘要

背景

在脓毒症患者中,当发生中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)时,取出中心静脉导管(CVC)并重新插入新的CVC并非总是可行的。本研究的目的是评估在菌血症发生7天内通过导丝将CVC更换为米诺环素/利福平涂层(M/R)-CVC的金黄色葡萄球菌CLABSI(SA-CLABSI)患者的结局。

方法

将每例患者与两名在7天内取出CVC的SA-CLABSI对照患者以及两名CVC保留超过7天的对照患者进行匹配。此外,建立了一个导管更换的体外模型。

结果

我们确定了40例SA-CLABSI患者。8例患者通过导丝将CVC更换为M/R-CVC,并与16例取出CVC的患者和16例保留CVC的患者进行比较。通过导丝更换CVC的患者与取出或保留CVC的患者相比,临床反应和复发率相似。然而,保留CVC的患者的总死亡率高于更换或取出CVC的患者(p = 0.034)。体外导管更换模型显示,与使用未涂层CVC进行更换相比,使用M/R-CVC通过导丝更换导管可完全防止生物膜定植(p < 0.0001)。

结论

在SA-CLABSI的情况下,通过导丝将CVC更换为M/R-CVC可能是在不同部位取出CVC并重新插入另一根CVC的替代方法,并且可能与较低的总死亡率相关。有必要进行进一步的大型前瞻性随机临床试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d53d/4261544/3d3bb4464408/12879_2014_Article_3839_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验