• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者报告结局量表的研制与验证

Development and validation of a patient reported outcome instrument for chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases.

作者信息

Li Jian-sheng, Wang Ming-hang, Yu Xue-qing, Li Su-yun, Xie Yang

机构信息

Geriatric Department, Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.

Department of Respiratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, 450000, China.

出版信息

Chin J Integr Med. 2015 Sep;21(9):667-75. doi: 10.1007/s11655-014-1982-4. Epub 2014 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1007/s11655-014-1982-4
PMID:25253553
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a specific patient reported outcome (PRO) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients (COPD-PRO) at a set of standardized procedures.

METHODS

Literature analysis, interview and group discussion were performed to draft an initial model of COPD-PRO. Thereafter, 65 clinicians and experts throughout China reviewed the draft scale. Then cognitive debriefing interviews with 40 patients were conducted to assess respondent comprehension of the scale. After that, the revised scale was validated through pre-testing and field-testing. Finally, the psychometric properties of the COPD-PRO were evaluated by indicators such as validity, reliability and responsiveness based on the data from 230 patients.

RESULTS

The COPD-PRO contained 17 items in 3 domains: amelioration of clinical symptoms, satisfaction of health condition and satisfaction of treatment effect. The Cronbach's α, Split-half coefficient and test-retest coefficient were 0.806, 0.744, 0.703, respectively; the correlation coefficients between domains and overall scale were 0.835-0.963; 5 factors were extracted according to the conceptual model. The differences of the scale scores before and after treatment were statistically significant (P=0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

The COPDPRO has good validity, reliability and responsiveness. The COPD-PRO could provide patients' response to the treatments and then evaluate the effect of treatment in a standardized way.

摘要

目的

通过一系列标准化程序开发并验证一种针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的特定患者报告结局(PRO)(COPD-PRO)。

方法

进行文献分析、访谈和小组讨论以起草COPD-PRO的初始模型。此后,来自中国各地的65名临床医生和专家对该量表草案进行了评审。然后对40名患者进行了认知反馈访谈,以评估受访者对该量表的理解。之后,通过预测试和现场测试对修订后的量表进行验证。最后,基于230名患者的数据,通过有效性、可靠性和反应性等指标评估COPD-PRO的心理测量特性。

结果

COPD-PRO包含3个领域的17个条目:临床症状改善、健康状况满意度和治疗效果满意度。Cronbach's α系数、分半系数和重测系数分别为0.806、0.744、0.703;各领域与总量表的相关系数为0.835 - 0.963;根据概念模型提取了5个因子。治疗前后量表得分差异有统计学意义(P = 0.000)。

结论

COPD-PRO具有良好的有效性、可靠性和反应性。COPD-PRO能够提供患者对治疗的反应,进而以标准化方式评估治疗效果。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a patient reported outcome instrument for chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者报告结局量表的研制与验证
Chin J Integr Med. 2015 Sep;21(9):667-75. doi: 10.1007/s11655-014-1982-4. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
2
Development and Validation of the Modified Patient-Reported Outcome Scale for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (mCOPD-PRO).《改良慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者报告结局量表(mCOPD-PRO)的制定与验证》
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Mar 27;15:661-669. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S240842. eCollection 2020.
3
[Development of a patient-reported outcome scale for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and its clinical applicability].[稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者报告结局量表的研制及其临床应用]
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2011 Aug;9(8):857-65. doi: 10.3736/jcim20110807.
4
Item selection, reliability and validity of the Shortness of Breath with Daily Activities (SOBDA) questionnaire: a new outcome measure for evaluating dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.项目选择、日常活动呼吸困难问卷(SOBDA)的信度和效度:一种用于评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病呼吸困难的新的结局测量指标。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Nov 14;11:196. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-196.
5
The development of a patient-reported outcome measure for assessing nighttime symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.开发一种用于评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病夜间症状的患者报告结局测量工具。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Jun 25;11:104. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-104.
6
Development of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease morning symptom diary (COPD-MSD).慢性阻塞性肺疾病晨间症状日记(COPD-MSD)的开发。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Jul 16;14(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0506-7.
7
Psychometric properties of computerized adaptive testing for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient-reported outcome measurement.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者报告结局测量的计算机化自适应测试的心理测量学特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Sep 4;22(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02291-6.
8
The PROactive instruments to measure physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于测量慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者身体活动的主动式仪器。
Eur Respir J. 2015 Oct;46(4):988-1000. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00183014. Epub 2015 May 28.
9
A meta-analysis of four randomized clinical trials to confirm the reliability and responsiveness of the Shortness of Breath with Daily Activities (SOBDA) questionnaire in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.一项对四项随机临床试验的荟萃分析,以证实日常活动气短(SOBDA)问卷在慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的可靠性和反应性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Oct 31;13:177. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0369-3.
10
Development and preliminary validation of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease scale quality of life instruments for chronic diseases-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on classical test theory and generalizability theory.基于经典测量理论和可推广性理论的慢性阻塞性肺疾病量表慢性疾病-慢性阻塞性肺疾病生活质量工具的开发和初步验证。
Chron Respir Dis. 2022 Jan-Dec;19:14799731221104099. doi: 10.1177/14799731221104099.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of an Inhaled Therapy Beliefs Questionnaire in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入治疗信念问卷的验证
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 15;13(8):2281. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082281.
2
Further Refinement is Required for Patient-Reported Outcome Scales for Respiratory Diseases Based on Traditional Chinese Medicine Theory for Applicability.基于中医理论的呼吸系统疾病患者报告结局量表在适用性方面仍需进一步完善。
Int J Gen Med. 2023 Dec 23;16:6099-6113. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S438297. eCollection 2023.
3
Effects of Chinese Herbal Medicine on Acute Exacerbations of COPD: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology of COPD.COPD 的流行病学。
Eur Respir Rev. 2009 Dec;18(114):213-21. doi: 10.1183/09059180.00003609.
2
[Development of patient-reported outcome scale for myasthenia gravis: a psychometric test].[重症肌无力患者报告结局量表的研制:一项心理测量学测试]
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2010 Feb;8(2):121-5.
3
Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.关于支持电子和纸质患者报告结局(PRO)测量等效性所需证据的建议:国际药物经济学与结果研究协会(ISPOR)电子PRO良好研究实践工作组报告
中药对 COPD 急性加重的影响:一项随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Nov 12;15:2901-2912. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S276082. eCollection 2020.
4
Development and Validation of the Modified Patient-Reported Outcome Scale for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (mCOPD-PRO).《改良慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者报告结局量表(mCOPD-PRO)的制定与验证》
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Mar 27;15:661-669. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S240842. eCollection 2020.
5
An evaluation of activity tolerance, patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction with the effectiveness of pulmonary daoyin on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的活动耐力、患者报告结局以及对肺导引术效果的满意度的评估。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Aug 4;12:2333-2342. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S117461. eCollection 2017.
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):419-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
4
Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test.COPD 评估测试的制定与首次验证。
Eur Respir J. 2009 Sep;34(3):648-54. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00102509.
5
Development and Validation of an Improved, COPD-Specific Version of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire.改良版慢性阻塞性肺疾病特异性圣乔治呼吸问卷的开发与验证
Chest. 2007 Aug;132(2):456-63. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-0702. Epub 2007 Jul 23.
6
Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes.评估生活质量结果中具有临床意义的差异。
Qual Life Res. 2005 Mar;14(2):285-95. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-0705-2.
7
Development and validation of the Chinese Quality of Life Instrument.中文版生活质量量表的研制与验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005 Apr 16;3:26. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-26.
8
Likert scales: how to (ab)use them.李克特量表:如何(滥)用它们。
Med Educ. 2004 Dec;38(12):1217-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x.
9
Incorporating the patient's perspective into drug development and communication: an ad hoc task force report of the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001.将患者观点纳入药物研发与沟通:2001年2月16日美国食品药品监督管理局患者报告结局(PRO)协调小组会议特别工作组报告
Value Health. 2003 Sep-Oct;6(5):522-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.65309.x.
10
On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation.关于评估健康相关生活质量工具的反应性:工具评估指南
Qual Life Res. 2003 Jun;12(4):349-62. doi: 10.1023/a:1023499322593.