Co-Construction Collaborative Innovation Center for Chinese Medicine and Respiratory Diseases by Henan & Education Ministry of P.R. China, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Henan Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine for Respiratory Disease, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Nov 12;15:2901-2912. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S276082. eCollection 2020.
Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is an essential occurrence in COPD management and is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Chinese herbal medicine is widely used in the treatment of AECOPD, but high quality randomized controlled trials are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine as adjuvant therapy for patients with AECOPD.
This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 378 participants from eight centers in China. Participants were randomly assigned to receive 10 g of Chinese herbal medicine (according to the type of Traditional Chinese medicine syndrome: Sanhanhuayin, Qingrehuatan, or Zaoshihuatan granules) or placebo, two times per day, for 14 days, in addition to conventional medicine. Participants were followed up for 84 days after the treatment. The primary end point was the COPD assessment test (CAT) score. Secondary end points included the Modified British Medical Research Council (mMRC) questionnaire and the COPD patient-reported outcome scale (COPD-PRO). We also assessed treatment failure and treatment success rate, length of hospitalization, number of patients with acute exacerbations, number of patients readmitted due to AECOPD, and number of deaths and intubation.
The between-group difference in the change from baseline for CAT on day 14 (end of treatment) was -2.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], -3.198 to -1.050; P<0.001), exceeding the minimal clinically important difference. The mMRC and COPD-PRO scores were lower in the intervention group compared to the control group (between-group difference in the change from baseline, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.48 to -0.08; P=0.007 and -2.51; 95% CI, -4.087 to -0.929; P=0.002, respectively) on day 14. The intervention group had a significantly shorter duration of hospital stay than the control group (mean difference, -1.21days; 95% CI, -2.041 to -0.419; P=0.003), significantly lower of number of exacerbations (risk ratio [RR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.409 to 0.892; P=0.010), and significantly lower number of readmissions due to AECOPD (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.193 to 0.865; P=0.015). Significant differences in the number of treatment failures or successes, deaths, and intubation were not observed. The difference in safety variables and adverse events between the two groups was not observed.
Chinese herbal medicine appears to be safe and beneficial for AECOPD and can be considered a complementary treatment for patients with AECOPD.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重(AECOPD)是 COPD 管理中的重要事件,是发病率和死亡率的主要原因。中药在 AECOPD 的治疗中被广泛应用,但高质量的随机对照试验有限。本研究旨在评估中药作为 AECOPD 辅助治疗的疗效和安全性。
这是一项在中国 8 个中心进行的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,共纳入 378 名参与者。参与者被随机分配接受 10 g 中药(根据中医证型:三黄化痰饮、清热化痰或燥湿化痰颗粒)或安慰剂,每天两次,共 14 天,同时接受常规治疗。在治疗后 84 天对参与者进行随访。主要终点是 COPD 评估测试(CAT)评分。次要终点包括改良英国医学研究委员会(mMRC)问卷和 COPD 患者报告结局量表(COPD-PRO)。我们还评估了治疗失败和治疗成功率、住院时间、AECOPD 急性加重患者人数、因 AECOPD 再入院患者人数以及死亡和插管人数。
治疗 14 天(治疗结束时)时,两组间 CAT 从基线的变化差异为-2.11(95%置信区间[CI]:-3.198 至-1.050;P<0.001),超过了最小临床重要差异。与对照组相比,干预组的 mMRC 和 COPD-PRO 评分在治疗 14 天时更低(从基线的变化差异,-0.28;95%CI:-0.48 至-0.08;P=0.007 和-2.51;95%CI:-4.087 至-0.929;P=0.002)。干预组的住院时间明显短于对照组(平均差异,-1.21 天;95%CI:-2.041 至-0.419;P=0.003),AECOPD 急性加重的次数明显减少(风险比[RR],0.60;95%CI:0.409 至 0.892;P=0.010),AECOPD 再入院的次数明显减少(RR,0.41;95%CI:0.193 至 0.865;P=0.015)。两组间治疗失败或成功、死亡和插管的发生率差异无统计学意义。两组间安全性变量和不良事件的差异无统计学意义。
中药似乎安全且对 AECOPD 有益,可以考虑作为 AECOPD 患者的辅助治疗。