Benmarhnia Tarik, Rey Lynda, Cartier Yuri, Clary Christelle M, Deguen Séverine, Brousselle Astrid
Département de médecine sociale et préventive, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada,
Int J Public Health. 2014 Dec;59(6):933-44. doi: 10.1007/s00038-014-0608-0. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
We did a systematic review to assess quantitative studies investigating the association between interventions aiming to reduce air pollution, health benefits and equity effects.
Three databases were searched for studies investigating the association between evaluated interventions aiming to reduce air pollution and heath-related benefits. We designed a two-stage selection process to judge how equity was assessed and we systematically determined if there was a heterogeneous effect of the intervention between subgroups or subareas.
Of 145 identified articles, 54 were reviewed in-depth with eight satisfying the inclusion criteria. This systematic review showed that interventions aiming to reduce air pollution in urban areas have a positive impact on air quality and on mortality rates, but the documented effect on equity is less straightforward.
Integration of equity in evidence-based public health is a great challenge nowadays. In this review we draw attention to the importance of considering equity in air pollution interventions. We also propose further methodological and theoretical challenges when assessing equity in interventions to reduce air pollution and we present opportunities to develop this research area.
我们进行了一项系统综述,以评估旨在减少空气污染的干预措施、健康效益和公平效应之间关联的定量研究。
检索了三个数据库,查找有关旨在减少空气污染的评估干预措施与健康相关效益之间关联的研究。我们设计了一个两阶段筛选过程,以判断公平性是如何评估的,并系统地确定干预措施在亚组或子区域之间是否存在异质性效应。
在145篇已识别的文章中,对54篇进行了深入审查,其中8篇符合纳入标准。这项系统综述表明,旨在减少城市空气污染的干预措施对空气质量和死亡率有积极影响,但对公平性的记录效应则不那么直接。
将公平性纳入循证公共卫生如今是一项巨大挑战。在本综述中,我们提请注意在空气污染干预措施中考虑公平性的重要性。我们还提出了在评估减少空气污染干预措施中的公平性时进一步的方法和理论挑战,并展示了发展这一研究领域的机会。