Taussig Delphine, Chipaux Mathilde, Lebas Axel, Fohlen Martine, Bulteau Christine, Ternier Jessica, Ferrand-Sorbets Sarah, Delalande Olivier, Dorfmüller Georg
Department of Paediatric Neurosurgery, Fondation Rothschild, 75940 Paris.
Department of Neurophysiology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen.
Epileptic Disord. 2014 Sep;16(3):280-95. doi: 10.1684/epd.2014.0679.
We report our experience of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) in 65 children with drug-resistant seizures, with a particular emphasis on young children.
We retrospectively studied all SEEG performed between 2009 and 2011 in our centre. As SEEG can have several indications, the patients were classified into three categories, according to the probability of surgery. The contribution of SEEG to the final decision regarding surgery was evaluated for each category separately. We also compared the main demographic and surgical data of children younger than 5 years of age (Group 1; 21 children) with those older than five years of age at the time of investigation (Group 2; 44 patients).
MRI was not contributory in 20% of patients (9.5% in group 1; 25% in group 2). Electrical stimulations localised the motor area in all patients when performed (49% of patients), even in group 1 (62% of patients). SEEG led to surgery in 78% of patients (90.5% in group 1; 73% in group 2), after a second invasive investigation in 9.2 % of patients. The resection involved more than one lobe in 25% of patients (37% in group 1; 19% in group 2). Ultimately, 78% of patients with a low probability of having surgery before SEEG received surgery (88% in group 1). The surgical outcome of Engel class 1 was reported for 67% of patients (79% of patients in group 1 and 59% in group 2). No complications occurred.
SEEG in children is safe and useful, and the surgical outcome in younger children is as good as, or sometimes even better than, that in older children. As a result of lower rates of complication and morbidity, SEEG appears to be more appropriate, in comparison to subdural grids, in situations where it is unclear if patients will have surgery after an invasive investigation.
我们报告了65例耐药性癫痫患儿的立体定向脑电图(SEEG)经验,尤其关注幼儿。
我们回顾性研究了2009年至2011年在我们中心进行的所有SEEG检查。由于SEEG有多种适应证,根据手术可能性将患者分为三类。分别评估SEEG对每类患者最终手术决策的贡献。我们还比较了5岁以下儿童(第1组;21例患儿)和调查时5岁以上儿童(第2组;44例患者)的主要人口统计学和手术数据。
20%的患者MRI检查无帮助(第1组为9.5%;第2组为25%)。进行电刺激时,所有患者(49%)的运动区均被定位,第1组患者中这一比例为62%。9.2%的患者在进行第二次侵入性检查后,SEEG引导78%的患者接受了手术(第1组为90.5%;第2组为73%)。25%的患者切除范围涉及一个以上脑叶(第1组为37%;第2组为19%)。最终,SEEG检查前手术可能性低的患者中有78%接受了手术(第1组为88%)。67%的患者报告手术结果为Engel 1级(第1组患者中79%为该级别,第2组为59%)。未发生并发症。
儿童SEEG检查安全且有用,幼儿的手术效果与年长儿童相同,有时甚至更好。由于并发症和发病率较低,与硬膜下格栅相比,在侵入性检查后不确定患者是否会接受手术的情况下,SEEG似乎更合适。