Suppr超能文献

学业勤奋任务(ADT):评估在枯燥但重要的学业上努力程度的个体差异。

The Academic Diligence Task (ADT): Assessing Individual Differences in Effort on Tedious but Important Schoolwork.

作者信息

Galla Brian M, Plummer Benjamin D, White Rachel E, Meketon David, D'Mello Sidney K, Duckworth Angela L

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania.

University of Notre Dame.

出版信息

Contemp Educ Psychol. 2014 Oct 1;39(4):314-325. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.001.

Abstract

The current study reports on the development and validation of the Academic Diligence Task (ADT), designed to assess the tendency to expend effort on academic tasks which are tedious in the moment but valued in the long-term. In this novel online task, students allocate their time between solving simple math problems (framed as beneficial for problem solving skills) and, alternatively, playing Tetris or watching entertaining videos. Using a large sample of high school seniors ( = 921), the ADT demonstrated convergent validity with self-report ratings of Big Five conscientiousness and its facets, self-control and grit, as well as discriminant validity from theoretically unrelated constructs, such as Big Five extraversion, openness, and emotional stability, test anxiety, life satisfaction, and positive and negative affect. The ADT also demonstrated incremental predictive validity for objectively measured GPA, standardized math and reading achievement test scores, high school graduation, and college enrollment, over and beyond demographics and intelligence. Collectively, findings suggest the feasibility of online behavioral measures to assess noncognitive individual differences that predict academic outcomes.

摘要

本研究报告了学业勤奋任务(ADT)的开发与验证情况,该任务旨在评估学生在当下枯燥但从长远来看有价值的学术任务上投入努力的倾向。在这个新颖的在线任务中,学生需要在解决简单数学问题(设定为对解决问题能力有益)与玩俄罗斯方块或观看娱乐视频之间分配时间。通过对大量高三学生样本( = 921)的研究,ADT显示出与大五人格尽责性及其各方面、自我控制和毅力的自我报告评分具有收敛效度,同时与理论上不相关的构念具有区分效度,如大五人格外向性、开放性和情绪稳定性、考试焦虑、生活满意度以及积极和消极情绪。ADT还显示出,在人口统计学和智力因素之外,对客观测量的平均绩点、标准化数学和阅读成绩测试分数、高中毕业率和大学入学率具有增量预测效度。总体而言,研究结果表明在线行为测量方法可用于评估预测学业成果的非认知个体差异。

相似文献

2
The effect of social preference on academic diligence in adolescence.社会偏好对青少年学业勤奋的影响。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Sep 11;6(9):190165. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190165. eCollection 2019 Sep.
10
Effects of diabetes on learning in children.糖尿病对儿童学习的影响。
Pediatrics. 2002 Jan;109(1):E9. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.1.e9.

引用本文的文献

10
Sensitivity of self-reported noncognitive skills to survey administration conditions.自我报告的非认知技能对调查管理条件的敏感性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jan 14;117(2):931-935. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1910731117. Epub 2019 Dec 30.

本文引用的文献

2
Domain-specific impulsivity in school-age children.学龄儿童的特定领域冲动性。
Dev Sci. 2013 Nov;16(6):879-93. doi: 10.1111/desc.12067. Epub 2013 May 28.
3
Conscientiousness: origins in childhood?尽责性:起源于童年?
Dev Psychol. 2014 May;50(5):1331-49. doi: 10.1037/a0030977. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
5
Executive functions.执行功能。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135-68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
7
An introduction to modern missing data analyses.现代缺失数据分析简介。
J Sch Psychol. 2010 Feb;48(1):5-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.10.001.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验