• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Academic Diligence Task (ADT): Assessing Individual Differences in Effort on Tedious but Important Schoolwork.学业勤奋任务(ADT):评估在枯燥但重要的学业上努力程度的个体差异。
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2014 Oct 1;39(4):314-325. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.001.
2
The effect of social preference on academic diligence in adolescence.社会偏好对青少年学业勤奋的影响。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Sep 11;6(9):190165. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190165. eCollection 2019 Sep.
3
Self- versus parent-ratings of industriousness, affect, and life satisfaction in relation to academic outcomes.自我评估与父母评估的勤奋程度、情感和生活满意度与学业成绩的关系。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2014 Jun;84(Pt 2):281-93. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12024. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
4
Social and Emotional Skills Predict Postsecondary Enrollment and Retention.社交与情感技能可预测高等教育入学率及留校率。
J Intell. 2023 Sep 22;11(10):186. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11100186.
5
Noncognitive Indicators as Critical Predictors of Students' Performance in Dental School.非认知指标作为牙科学校学生学业表现的关键预测因素
J Dent Educ. 2015 Dec;79(12):1402-10.
6
The validity of physical aggression in predicting adolescent academic performance.身体攻击行为在预测青少年学业成绩方面的有效性。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2007 Mar;77(Pt 1):167-76. doi: 10.1348/000709905X79563.
7
A brief behavioral measure of frustration tolerance predicts academic achievement immediately and two years later.一项简短的行为挫折容忍度量表可预测学生当下和两年后的学业成就。
Emotion. 2019 Sep;19(6):1081-1092. doi: 10.1037/emo0000492. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
8
Academic Grit Scale: Psychometric properties and associations with achievement and life satisfaction.学术坚毅量表:心理测量学特性及其与成就和生活满意度的关系。
J Sch Psychol. 2019 Feb;72:49-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2018.12.001. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
9
[Role of the implicit theories of intelligence in learning situations].[智力的内隐理论在学习情境中的作用]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):456-63. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95460-7.
10
Effects of diabetes on learning in children.糖尿病对儿童学习的影响。
Pediatrics. 2002 Jan;109(1):E9. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.1.e9.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Cognitive Flexibility Equivalent to Shifting? Investigating Cognitive Flexibility in Multiple Domains.认知灵活性等同于转换吗?多领域认知灵活性研究。
J Cogn. 2024 Oct 10;7(1):73. doi: 10.5334/joc.403. eCollection 2024.
2
Cognitive perspectives on maintaining physicians' medical expertise: V. Using a motivational framework to understand the benefits and costs of testing.从认知角度看保持医生医学专长的问题:五、利用动机框架理解检测的益处和代价。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Oct 10;8(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00518-6.
3
Exploring user experience and performance of a tedious task through human-agent relationship.通过人机关系探索枯燥任务的用户体验和性能。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 21;13(1):2995. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29874-5.
4
Large studies reveal how reference bias limits policy applications of self-report measures.大型研究揭示了参考偏差如何限制自我报告测量在政策应用中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 10;12(1):19189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23373-9.
5
Chinese EFL Students' Social-Emotional Competence, Grit, and Academic Engagement.中国英语学习者的社会情感能力、毅力与学业投入
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 10;13:914759. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.914759. eCollection 2022.
6
Simple questionnaires outperform behavioral tasks to measure socio-emotional skills in students.简单的问卷比行为任务更能衡量学生的社会情感技能。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 10;12(1):442. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04046-5.
7
More Effort, Less Fatigue: The Role of Interest in Increasing Effort and Reducing Mental Fatigue.付出更多努力,减少疲劳:兴趣在增加努力和减轻精神疲劳方面的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 19;12:755858. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.755858. eCollection 2021.
8
Mixed Results on the Efficacy of the CharacterMe Smartphone App to Improve Self-Control, Patience, and Emotional Regulation Competencies in Adolescents.CharacterMe智能手机应用程序提高青少年自我控制、耐心和情绪调节能力的效果喜忧参半。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 20;12:586713. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.586713. eCollection 2021.
9
Validation of survey effort measures of grit and self-control in a sample of high school students.在高中生样本中对坚毅和自我控制的调查努力措施进行验证。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 1;15(7):e0235396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235396. eCollection 2020.
10
Sensitivity of self-reported noncognitive skills to survey administration conditions.自我报告的非认知技能对调查管理条件的敏感性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jan 14;117(2):931-935. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1910731117. Epub 2019 Dec 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Boring but important: a self-transcendent purpose for learning fosters academic self-regulation.枯燥却重要:学习的自我超越目标能促进学业自我调节。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Oct;107(4):559-80. doi: 10.1037/a0037637.
2
Domain-specific impulsivity in school-age children.学龄儿童的特定领域冲动性。
Dev Sci. 2013 Nov;16(6):879-93. doi: 10.1111/desc.12067. Epub 2013 May 28.
3
Conscientiousness: origins in childhood?尽责性:起源于童年?
Dev Psychol. 2014 May;50(5):1331-49. doi: 10.1037/a0030977. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
4
Estimating the Reliability of Single-Item Life Satisfaction Measures: Results from Four National Panel Studies.评估单项目生活满意度量表的信度:四项全国性面板研究的结果
Soc Indic Res. 2012 Feb 1;105(3):323-331. doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9783-z. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
5
Executive functions.执行功能。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135-68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
6
A Meta-Analysis of the Convergent Validity of Self-Control Measures.自我控制测量方法的收敛效度的元分析
J Res Pers. 2011 Jun 1;45(3):259-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2011.02.004.
7
An introduction to modern missing data analyses.现代缺失数据分析简介。
J Sch Psychol. 2010 Feb;48(1):5-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.10.001.
8
A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance.人格五因素模型与学业成绩的荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2009 Mar;135(2):322-38. doi: 10.1037/a0014996.
9
Modern robust statistical methods: an easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research.现代稳健统计方法:一种最大化研究准确性和效能的简便方法。
Am Psychol. 2008 Oct;63(7):591-601. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.591.
10
Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: a limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative.做出选择会损害后续的自我控制能力:一种关于决策、自我调节和积极主动性的有限资源观点。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 May;94(5):883-98. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.883.

学业勤奋任务(ADT):评估在枯燥但重要的学业上努力程度的个体差异。

The Academic Diligence Task (ADT): Assessing Individual Differences in Effort on Tedious but Important Schoolwork.

作者信息

Galla Brian M, Plummer Benjamin D, White Rachel E, Meketon David, D'Mello Sidney K, Duckworth Angela L

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania.

University of Notre Dame.

出版信息

Contemp Educ Psychol. 2014 Oct 1;39(4):314-325. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.001
PMID:25258470
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4170650/
Abstract

The current study reports on the development and validation of the Academic Diligence Task (ADT), designed to assess the tendency to expend effort on academic tasks which are tedious in the moment but valued in the long-term. In this novel online task, students allocate their time between solving simple math problems (framed as beneficial for problem solving skills) and, alternatively, playing Tetris or watching entertaining videos. Using a large sample of high school seniors ( = 921), the ADT demonstrated convergent validity with self-report ratings of Big Five conscientiousness and its facets, self-control and grit, as well as discriminant validity from theoretically unrelated constructs, such as Big Five extraversion, openness, and emotional stability, test anxiety, life satisfaction, and positive and negative affect. The ADT also demonstrated incremental predictive validity for objectively measured GPA, standardized math and reading achievement test scores, high school graduation, and college enrollment, over and beyond demographics and intelligence. Collectively, findings suggest the feasibility of online behavioral measures to assess noncognitive individual differences that predict academic outcomes.

摘要

本研究报告了学业勤奋任务(ADT)的开发与验证情况,该任务旨在评估学生在当下枯燥但从长远来看有价值的学术任务上投入努力的倾向。在这个新颖的在线任务中,学生需要在解决简单数学问题(设定为对解决问题能力有益)与玩俄罗斯方块或观看娱乐视频之间分配时间。通过对大量高三学生样本( = 921)的研究,ADT显示出与大五人格尽责性及其各方面、自我控制和毅力的自我报告评分具有收敛效度,同时与理论上不相关的构念具有区分效度,如大五人格外向性、开放性和情绪稳定性、考试焦虑、生活满意度以及积极和消极情绪。ADT还显示出,在人口统计学和智力因素之外,对客观测量的平均绩点、标准化数学和阅读成绩测试分数、高中毕业率和大学入学率具有增量预测效度。总体而言,研究结果表明在线行为测量方法可用于评估预测学业成果的非认知个体差异。