Galla Brian M, Plummer Benjamin D, White Rachel E, Meketon David, D'Mello Sidney K, Duckworth Angela L
University of Pennsylvania.
University of Notre Dame.
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2014 Oct 1;39(4):314-325. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.001.
The current study reports on the development and validation of the Academic Diligence Task (ADT), designed to assess the tendency to expend effort on academic tasks which are tedious in the moment but valued in the long-term. In this novel online task, students allocate their time between solving simple math problems (framed as beneficial for problem solving skills) and, alternatively, playing Tetris or watching entertaining videos. Using a large sample of high school seniors ( = 921), the ADT demonstrated convergent validity with self-report ratings of Big Five conscientiousness and its facets, self-control and grit, as well as discriminant validity from theoretically unrelated constructs, such as Big Five extraversion, openness, and emotional stability, test anxiety, life satisfaction, and positive and negative affect. The ADT also demonstrated incremental predictive validity for objectively measured GPA, standardized math and reading achievement test scores, high school graduation, and college enrollment, over and beyond demographics and intelligence. Collectively, findings suggest the feasibility of online behavioral measures to assess noncognitive individual differences that predict academic outcomes.
本研究报告了学业勤奋任务(ADT)的开发与验证情况,该任务旨在评估学生在当下枯燥但从长远来看有价值的学术任务上投入努力的倾向。在这个新颖的在线任务中,学生需要在解决简单数学问题(设定为对解决问题能力有益)与玩俄罗斯方块或观看娱乐视频之间分配时间。通过对大量高三学生样本( = 921)的研究,ADT显示出与大五人格尽责性及其各方面、自我控制和毅力的自我报告评分具有收敛效度,同时与理论上不相关的构念具有区分效度,如大五人格外向性、开放性和情绪稳定性、考试焦虑、生活满意度以及积极和消极情绪。ADT还显示出,在人口统计学和智力因素之外,对客观测量的平均绩点、标准化数学和阅读成绩测试分数、高中毕业率和大学入学率具有增量预测效度。总体而言,研究结果表明在线行为测量方法可用于评估预测学业成果的非认知个体差异。