LaPrade Christopher M, James Evan W, LaPrade Robert F, Engebretsen Lars
Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo and Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Oslo, Norway.
J Knee Surg. 2015 Feb;28(1):35-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390028. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
In recent years, the use of biologics for the primary treatment and augmentation of treatment in patients with knee pathology has increased substantially. Techniques and applications for biologic preparations such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been developed and refined to increase the healing response in bone, ligaments, cartilage, meniscal tissue, and other areas of the knee. Beginning with basic science and animal models, and finally proceeding to clinical human trials, the effect of biologics on clinical outcomes has been widely studied; however, many results have been inconclusive on their true effectiveness. The purpose of this article is to review current strategies for evaluating outcomes after biologic treatment and to propose new recommendations for assessing outcomes following the use of biologics in the knee. In addition, the importance of study design, current challenges, and future directions will be reviewed to describe the current standards for future studies to follow.
近年来,生物制剂在膝关节病变患者的初始治疗及强化治疗中的应用显著增加。诸如富血小板血浆(PRP)和间充质干细胞(MSCs)等生物制剂的技术及应用已得到开发和完善,以增强骨骼、韧带、软骨、半月板组织及膝关节其他部位的愈合反应。从基础科学和动物模型开始,最终进入人体临床试验,生物制剂对临床结局的影响已得到广泛研究;然而,关于其真正疗效的许多结果尚无定论。本文旨在回顾生物治疗后评估结局的当前策略,并就膝关节使用生物制剂后评估结局提出新的建议。此外,还将回顾研究设计的重要性、当前挑战及未来方向,以描述未来研究应遵循的当前标准。