• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重度残疾成年人与个人护理员之间成功关系的归因。

Attribution for successful relationships between severely disabled adults and personal care attendants.

作者信息

Opie N D, Miller E T

出版信息

Rehabil Nurs. 1989 Jul-Aug;14(4):196-9. doi: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.1989.tb01095.x.

DOI:10.1002/j.2048-7940.1989.tb01095.x
PMID:2526355
Abstract

This study explored the mutual perceptions of a convenience sample of 22 pairs of severely disabled adults and their personal care attendants regarding their definitions of the relationship and causal explanations for the relationship outcome (either success or failure). A semistructured interview and Delphi instrument were used to collect data. Attribution theory was used to shape the study design. The most frequently cited causal explanations for a successful outcome were mutual effort, skill, and commitment of the personal care attendant and disabled employer. The majority of subjects defined their relationship as productive and friendly. The data support previous findings and provide direction for programs to prepare disabled people and personal care attendants for their respective roles.

摘要

本研究探讨了22对重度残疾成年人及其个人护理员的便利样本对关系定义以及关系结果(成功或失败)因果解释的相互认知。采用半结构化访谈和德尔菲工具收集数据。归因理论用于构建研究设计。对于成功结果,最常被提及的因果解释是个人护理员和残疾雇主的共同努力、技能和承诺。大多数受试者将他们的关系定义为富有成效且友好。这些数据支持了先前的研究结果,并为帮助残疾人及个人护理员为各自角色做好准备的项目提供了方向。

相似文献

1
Attribution for successful relationships between severely disabled adults and personal care attendants.重度残疾成年人与个人护理员之间成功关系的归因。
Rehabil Nurs. 1989 Jul-Aug;14(4):196-9. doi: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.1989.tb01095.x.
2
Personal care attendants and severely disabled adults: attributions for relationship outcomes.
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 1989 Aug;3(4):205-10.
3
Severely disabled adults and personal care attendants: a pilot study.
Rehabil Nurs. 1987 Jul-Aug;12(4):185-7. doi: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.1987.tb00590.x.
4
Disability, constructed vulnerability, and socially conscious palliative care.残疾、人为构建的脆弱性与具有社会意识的姑息治疗。
J Palliat Care. 2006 Autumn;22(3):183-9.
5
Evidence of unmet need in the care of severely physically disabled adults.在严重身体残疾成年人护理方面存在未满足需求的证据。
BMJ. 1993 Jan 9;306(6870):95-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6870.95.
6
Caring together for elderly mothers: a qualitative study of relations between adult daughters and supportive home care workers.共同关爱老年母亲:成年女儿与居家护理员关系的质性研究
J Women Aging. 1999;11(4):87-111. doi: 10.1300/J074v11n04_07.
7
Communicating respectfully with people who have disabilities.
Home Healthc Nurse. 2013 Nov-Dec;31(10):576-9; quiz 579-81. doi: 10.1097/01.NHH.0000436219.02714.3a.
8
The effectiveness of a serious game to enhance empathy for care workers for people with disabilities: A parallel randomized controlled trial.一款严肃游戏增强残疾人士护理工作者同理心的效果:一项平行随机对照试验。
Disabil Health J. 2018 Oct;11(4):576-582. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
9
Effectiveness of the 'Who's Challenging Who' support staff training intervention to improve attitudes and empathy towards adults with intellectual disability and challenging behaviours: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.“谁在挑战谁”支持人员培训干预措施对改善针对成年智障人士及挑战性行为的态度和同理心的效果:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 5;18(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2175-1.
10
The effect of disability empathy activity on the attitude of nursing students towards disabled people: a pilot study.残疾共情活动对护理专业学生对待残疾人态度的影响:一项试点研究。
Contemp Nurse. 2017 Feb;53(1):82-93. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2017.1292143. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the factors that influence the quality of paid disability support for adults with acquired neurological disability and complex needs: a scoping review protocol.了解影响获得性神经残疾及复杂需求成人的有偿残疾支持质量的因素:一项范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 29;9(12):e034654. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034654.