Misir A Ferhat, Sumer Mahmut, Yenisey Murat, Ergioglu Erol
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zonguldak Karaelmas University, Zonguldak, Turkey.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Dec;67(12):2663-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.056.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the heat generated in bone by 2 implant drill systems in vitro with and without using surgical drill guides.
Temperature was measured with K type thermocouple in vitro using the bovine femoral cortical bone model. A constant drill load of 2.0 kg was applied throughout the drilling procedures via a drilling rig at a speed of 1,500 rpm. Two different implant drill systems-System A (with external irrigation) and System B (with both external and internal irrigation)-were evaluated. The samples were divided into 4 groups. System A test group 1 (TG1) included the following: 20 samples for drilling with surgical drill guides; control group 1 (CG1): 20 samples for classical implant site preparation. System B test group 2 (TG2) included the following: 20 samples for drilling with surgical drill guides; control group 2 (CG2): 20 samples for classical implant site preparation. Heat was measured at the final drill in the drilling sequence (4.2 and 4.4 mm). Thermocouples were placed at a 1-mm distance from the osteotomy area at depths of 3, 6, and 9 mm. Heat measurements were recorded out to 50 uses by a software program. Data were subjected to the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The alpha level was set a priori at 0.05.
The mean maximum temperatures at the depths of 3, 6, and 9 mm using surgical drill guides were 34.2 degrees , 39.7 degrees , and 39.8 degrees C, respectively, although without using surgical drill guides the values were 28.8 degrees , 30.7 degrees , and 31.1 degrees C. A statistically significant difference was found at the depths of 3, 6, and 9 mm between using surgical drill guides and classical drilling procedure.
From a heat generation standpoint, we conclude that preparing an implant site with using surgical drill guides generates heat more than classical implant site preparation regardless of the irrigation type.
本研究的目的是在体外评估两种种植体钻孔系统在使用和不使用手术钻孔导向器的情况下在骨中产生的热量。
在体外使用牛股骨皮质骨模型,用K型热电偶测量温度。在整个钻孔过程中,通过钻机以1500转/分钟的速度施加2.0千克的恒定钻孔负荷。评估了两种不同的种植体钻孔系统——系统A(外部冲洗)和系统B(外部和内部冲洗)。样本分为4组。系统A测试组1(TG1)包括:20个使用手术钻孔导向器钻孔的样本;对照组1(CG1):20个用于传统种植体植入部位制备的样本。系统B测试组2(TG2)包括:20个使用手术钻孔导向器钻孔的样本;对照组2(CG2):20个用于传统种植体植入部位制备的样本。在钻孔序列的最后钻孔(4.2和4.4毫米)时测量热量。热电偶放置在距截骨区域1毫米处,深度分别为3、6和9毫米。通过软件程序记录热量测量结果直至50次使用。数据进行Mann-Whitney U检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验。α水平预先设定为0.05。
使用手术钻孔导向器时,在3、6和9毫米深度处的平均最高温度分别为34.2摄氏度、39.7摄氏度和39.8摄氏度,而不使用手术钻孔导向器时,这些值分别为28.8摄氏度、30.7摄氏度和31.1摄氏度。在使用手术钻孔导向器和传统钻孔程序之间,在3、6和9毫米深度处发现了统计学上的显著差异。
从产热角度来看,我们得出结论,无论冲洗类型如何,使用手术钻孔导向器制备种植体植入部位比传统种植体植入部位制备产生的热量更多。