Miranda Benjamin H, Herman Katie A, Malahias Marco, Juma Ali
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chester, UK.
Arch Plast Surg. 2014 Sep;41(5):500-4. doi: 10.5999/aps.2014.41.5.500. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
Skin cancer is the most prevalent cancer by organ type and referral accuracy is vital for diagnosis and management. The British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) and literature highlight the importance of accurate skin lesion examination, diagnosis and educationally-relevant studies.
We undertook a review of the relevant literature, a national audit of skin lesion description standards and a study of speciality training influences on these descriptions. Questionnaires (n=200), with pictures of a circular and an oval lesion, were distributed to UK dermatology/plastic surgery consultants and speciality trainees (ST), general practitioners (GP), and medical students (MS). The following variables were analysed against a pre-defined 95% inclusion accuracy standard: site, shape, size, skin/colour, and presence of associated scars.
There were 250 lesion descriptions provided by 125 consultants, STs, GPs, and MSs. Inclusion accuracy was greatest for consultants over STs (80% vs. 68%; P<0.001), GPs (57%) and MSs (46%) (P<0.0001), for STs over GPs (P<0.010) and MSs (P<0.0001) and for GPs over MSs (P<0.010), all falling below audit standard. Size description accuracy sub-analysis according to circular/oval dimensions was as follows: consultants (94%), GPs (80%), STs (73%), MSs (37%), with the most common error implying a quadrilateral shape (66%). Addressing BAD guidelines and published requirements for more empirical performance data to improve teaching methods, we performed a national audit and studied skin lesion descriptions. To improve diagnostic and referral accuracy for patients, healthcare professionals must strive towards accuracy (a circle is not a square).
We provide supportive evidence that increased speciality training improves this process and propose that greater focus is placed on such training early on during medical training, and maintained throughout clinical practice.
皮肤癌是按器官类型划分最为常见的癌症,转诊准确性对于诊断和治疗至关重要。英国皮肤科医师协会(BAD)及相关文献强调了准确的皮肤病变检查、诊断以及与教育相关研究的重要性。
我们对相关文献进行了综述,对皮肤病变描述标准进行了全国性审核,并研究了专科培训对这些描述的影响。向英国皮肤科/整形外科顾问及专科实习生(ST)、全科医生(GP)和医学生(MS)发放了包含圆形和椭圆形病变图片的问卷(n = 200)。针对预先定义的95%纳入准确性标准,对以下变量进行了分析:部位、形状、大小、皮肤/颜色以及相关瘢痕的存在情况。
125名顾问、实习生、全科医生和医学生提供了250份病变描述。顾问的纳入准确性高于实习生(80%对68%;P < 0.001)、全科医生(57%)和医学生(46%)(P < 0.0001),实习生高于全科医生(P < 0.010)和医学生(P < 0.0001),全科医生高于医学生(P < 0.010),所有这些均低于审核标准。根据圆形/椭圆形尺寸进行的大小描述准确性子分析如下:顾问(94%)、全科医生(80%)、实习生(73%)、医学生(37%),最常见的错误是将其描述为四边形形状(66%)。为了遵循BAD指南并公布更多实证性能数据以改进教学方法的要求,我们进行了全国性审核并研究了皮肤病变描述。为提高患者的诊断和转诊准确性,医疗专业人员必须力求准确(圆形不是方形)。
我们提供了支持性证据,表明增加专科培训可改善这一过程,并建议在医学培训早期更加注重此类培训,并在整个临床实践中持续进行。