Ernesäter Annica, Engström Maria, Winblad Ulrika, Holmström Inger K
Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Caring Science University of Gavle, Gavle, Sweden.
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Health Services Research, Uppsala, Sweden.
BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 3;4(10):e005961. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005961.
The purpose of this study is to compare communication patterns in calls subjected to a malpractice claim with matched controls.
In many countries, telephone advice nursing is patients' first contact with healthcare. Telenurses' assessment of callers' symptoms and needs are based on verbal communication only, and problems with over-triage and under-triage have been reported.
A total sample of all reported medical errors (n=33) during the period 2003-2010 within Swedish Healthcare Direct was retrieved. Corresponding calls were thereafter identified and collected as sound files from the manager in charge at the respective call centres. For technical reasons, calls from four of the cases were not possible to retrieve. For the present study, matched control calls (n=26) based on the patient's age, gender and main symptom presented by the caller were collected.
Male patients were in majority (n=16), and the most common reasons for calling were abdominal pain (n=10) and chest pain (n=5). There were statistically significant differences between the communication in the cases and controls: telenurses used fewer open-ended medical questions (p<0.001) in the cases compared to the control calls; callers provided telenurses with more medical information in the control calls compared to the cases (p=0.001); and telenurses used more facilitation and patient activation activities in the control calls (p=0.034), such as back-channel response (p=0.001), compared to the cases.
The present study shows that telenurses in malpractice claimed calls used more closed-ended questioning compared to those in control calls, who used more open-ended questioning and back-channel response, which provided them with richer medical descriptions and more information from the caller. Hence, these communicative techniques are important in addition to solid medical and nursing competence and sound decision aid systems.
本研究旨在比较遭遇医疗事故索赔的电话沟通模式与匹配的对照样本。
在许多国家,电话咨询护理是患者与医疗保健的首次接触。远程护士对来电者症状和需求的评估仅基于言语沟通,并且已报告存在过度分诊和分诊不足的问题。
检索了2003年至2010年瑞典医疗保健热线内所有报告的医疗差错的总样本(n = 33)。此后,从各个呼叫中心的主管经理处识别并收集了相应的电话作为音频文件。由于技术原因,无法检索其中四个案例的电话。对于本研究,收集了基于患者年龄、性别和来电者提出的主要症状的匹配对照电话(n = 26)。
男性患者占多数(n = 16),最常见的致电原因是腹痛(n = 10)和胸痛(n = 5)。案例组和对照组的沟通存在统计学显著差异:与对照电话相比,案例组中远程护士使用的开放式医学问题较少(p < 0.001);与案例组相比,对照电话中来电者向远程护士提供的医学信息更多(p = 0.001);与案例组相比,对照电话中远程护士使用更多的促进和患者激活活动(p = 0.034),例如反馈回应(p = 0.001)。
本研究表明,与对照电话中的远程护士相比,遭遇医疗事故索赔电话中的远程护士使用更多封闭式提问,而对照电话中的远程护士使用更多开放式提问和反馈回应,这使他们能够从来电者那里获得更丰富的医学描述和更多信息。因此,除了扎实的医学和护理能力以及完善的决策辅助系统外,这些沟通技巧也很重要。