Montoye Alexander H, Pfeiffer Karin A, Suton Darijan, Trost Stewart G
Department of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Movement Science Department, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, Michigan.
Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2014 Jan 1;18(4):273-285. doi: 10.1080/1091367X.2014.942454.
The responsiveness to change of the Actical and ActiGraph accelerometers was assessed in children and adolescents. Participants (n=208) aged 6-16 years completed two simulated free-living protocols, one with primarily light-to-moderate physical activities (PA) and one with mostly moderate-to-vigorous PA. Time in sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous PA was estimated using 8 previously developed cut-points (4 for Actical and 4 for ActiGraph) and 15-s and 30-s epochs. Accelerometer responsiveness for detecting differences in PA between protocols was assessed using standardized response means (SRM). SRM values ≥0.8 represented high responsiveness to change. Both accelerometers showed high responsiveness for all PA intensities (SRMs = 1.2-4.7 for Actical and 1.1-3.3 for ActiGraph). All cut-points and epoch lengths yielded high responsiveness, and choice of cut-points and epoch length had little effect on responsiveness. Thus, both the Actical and ActiGraph can detect change in PA in a simulated free-living setting, irrespective of cut-point selection or epoch length.
在儿童和青少年中评估了Actical和ActiGraph加速度计对变化的反应性。208名6至16岁的参与者完成了两项模拟自由生活方案,一项主要是轻度至中度身体活动(PA),另一项主要是中度至剧烈PA。使用8个先前制定的切点(Actical有4个,ActiGraph有4个)以及15秒和30秒的时间段来估计久坐、轻度、中度和剧烈PA的时间。使用标准化反应均值(SRM)评估加速度计检测方案之间PA差异的反应性。SRM值≥0.8表示对变化的高反应性。两种加速度计对所有PA强度均显示出高反应性(Actical的SRM为1.2 - 4.7,ActiGraph的SRM为1.1 - 3.3)。所有切点和时间段长度均产生高反应性,切点和时间段长度的选择对反应性影响很小。因此,无论切点选择或时间段长度如何,Actical和ActiGraph都能在模拟自由生活环境中检测到PA的变化。