Zhang Linda, Tan Wen Hui, Chang Ronald, Eagon J C
Department of Surgery and Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Box 8109, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA,
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1316-20. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3848-4. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
Growing number of patients requires revisional bariatric surgery. This study compares perioperative course and outcomes of revisional versus primary bariatric surgery.
Patients who underwent revisional bariatric surgery from Jan 1997 to Sept 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. Every revisional patient with BMI >35 and age <70 was matched with a primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass control patient based on preoperative BMI, age, sex, and year of surgery. Patients' preoperative indications, intraoperative/postoperative course, and complications were analyzed.
Two hundred and fifty five patients underwent revisional bariatric surgery with resulting Roux-en-Y gastric bypass anatomy while 1,674 patients underwent primary gastric bypass in the same time interval. Of 255 patients, 172 patients were paired with 172 primary gastric bypass patients. Revisional bariatric group had preoperative BMI 48 ± 9, age 52 ± 9 years, 93 % female, 44 % laparoscopic, 30 % diabetic, 60 % hypertensive. Primary bypass patients had preoperative BMI 49 ± 8, age 52 ± 9 years, 93 % female, 97 % laparoscopic, 49 % diabetic, 67 % hypertensive. Compared to primary bypass patients, revisional patients had significantly higher estimated blood loss (463.7 vs. 113.3 mL), longer operative time (272.5 vs. 175.5 min), greater risk for ICU stay (N = 24, 14 % vs. N = 2, 1 %), and longer hospital stay (5.6 vs. 2.5 days). There were significantly more intraoperative liver (N = 13, 8 % vs. N = 1, 1 %) and spleen (N = 18, 10 % vs. N = 0) injuries, and more enterotomies (N = 9, 5 % vs. N = 0) in the revisional group. There were also significantly more postoperative complications (N = 94, 55 % vs. N = 48, 28 %), readmissions (N = 27, 16 % vs. N = 12, 7 %), and reoperations (N = 16, 9 % vs. N = 3, 2 %) within 30 days of surgery. Mean percentage weight loss at 1 year was significantly less for revisional patients (27 vs. 37 %). There was no significant difference in 30 day mortality between the two groups (N = 6 vs. 0).
Even in experienced hands, complex revisional bariatric surgery should be approached with significant caution, especially given that weight loss is less substantial.
需要进行减重手术修正的患者数量日益增加。本研究比较了减重手术修正术与初次减重手术的围手术期过程及结果。
回顾性分析1997年1月至2012年9月期间接受减重手术修正术的患者。每例BMI>35且年龄<70岁的修正手术患者,根据术前BMI、年龄、性别和手术年份,与一名初次 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术对照患者进行匹配。分析患者的术前指征、术中/术后过程及并发症。
255例患者接受了减重手术修正术,术后形成 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路解剖结构,而在同一时间段内有1674例患者接受了初次胃旁路手术。在255例患者中,172例与172例初次胃旁路手术患者配对。减重手术修正组术前BMI为48±9,年龄52±9岁,93%为女性,44%为腹腔镜手术,30%患有糖尿病,60%患有高血压。初次旁路手术患者术前BMI为49±8,年龄52±9岁,93%为女性,97%为腹腔镜手术,49%患有糖尿病,67%患有高血压。与初次旁路手术患者相比,修正手术患者的估计失血量显著更高(463.7对113.3 mL),手术时间更长(272.5对175.5分钟),入住重症监护病房的风险更高(24例,14%对2例,1%),住院时间更长(5.6对2.5天)。修正组术中肝脏损伤(13例,8%对1例,1%)和脾脏损伤(18例,10%对0例)明显更多,肠切开术也更多(9例,5%对0例)。术后并发症(94例,55%对48例,28%)、再次入院(27例,16%对12例,7%)和再次手术(16例,9%对3例,2%)在术后30天内也明显更多。修正手术患者1年时的平均体重减轻百分比明显更低(27%对37%)。两组之间30天死亡率无显著差异(6例对0例)。
即使由经验丰富的医生操作,复杂的减重手术修正术也应格外谨慎进行,尤其是考虑到体重减轻效果较差。