Arita Nestor A, Nguyen Mylan T, Nguyen Duyen H, Berger Rachel L, Lew Debbie F, Suliburk James T, Askenasy Erik P, Kao Lillian S, Liang Mike K
Department of General Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jul;29(7):1769-80. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3859-1. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
The role of laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias remains incompletely defined. We hypothesize that laparoscopy, compared to open repair with mesh, decreases surgical site infection (SSI) for all ventral hernia types.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were reviewed to identify studies evaluating outcomes of laparoscopic versus open repair with mesh of ventral hernias and divided into groups (primary or incisional). Studies with high risk of bias were excluded. Primary outcomes of interest were recurrence and SSI. Fixed effects model was used unless significant heterogeneity, assessed with the Higgins I square (I(2)), was encountered.
There were 5 and 15 studies for primary and incisional cohorts. No difference was seen in recurrence between laparoscopic and open repair in the two hernia groups. SSI was more common with open repair in both hernia groups: primary (OR 4.17, 95%CI [2.03-8.55]) and incisional (OR 5.16, 95%CI [2.79-9.57]).
Laparoscopic repair, compared to open repair with mesh, decreases rates of SSI in all types of ventral hernias with no difference in recurrence. These data suggest that laparoscopic approach may be the treatment of choice for all types of ventral hernias.
腹腔镜修补腹疝的作用仍未完全明确。我们假设,与开放式补片修补术相比,腹腔镜手术可降低所有类型腹疝的手术部位感染(SSI)发生率。
检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库,以确定评估腹腔镜与开放式补片修补腹疝(分为原发性或切口疝)疗效的研究。排除有高偏倚风险的研究。主要关注的结局指标为复发率和手术部位感染率。除非使用Higgins I²(I(2))评估存在显著异质性,否则采用固定效应模型。
原发性和切口疝队列分别有5项和15项研究。在两个疝组中,腹腔镜修补术和开放式修补术的复发率无差异。在两个疝组中,开放式修补术的手术部位感染更为常见:原发性(比值比4.17,95%置信区间[2.03 - 8.55])和切口疝(比值比5.16,95%置信区间[2.79 - 9.57])。
与开放式补片修补术相比,腹腔镜修补术可降低所有类型腹疝的手术部位感染率,且复发率无差异。这些数据表明,腹腔镜手术可能是所有类型腹疝的首选治疗方法。