Suppr超能文献

Utilizing probabilities as decision weights in closed and open information boards: a comparison of children and adults.

作者信息

Betsch Tilmann, Lang Anna, Lehmann Anne, Axmann Jana Maria

机构信息

University of Erfurt, Germany.

University of Erfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Nov;153:74-86. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Oct 9.

Abstract

Decisions in preschoolers (6 years), elementary schoolers (9.7 years), and adults (21 years) were studied with an information board crossing three probabilistic cues (validities: .83, .67, .50) with two options. Experiment 1 (n=215) applied a standard version of the information board (closed presentation format), in which information must be searched sequentially and kept in mind for the decision. Experiment 2 (n=217) applied an open format (Glöckner & Betsch, 2008), in which all information was visible during decision making. Elementary schoolers but not preschoolers benefited from an open format—indicated by an increase in using probabilities as decision weights. In the open but not closed format, choices were biased by normatively irrelevant information (the lure). Variations in the prediction patterns of the cues influenced decisions in all age groups. Effects for presentation format, pattern, and lure jointly indicate that even children are capable of considering multiple information in their decisions.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验