Suppr超能文献

拉姆齐评分和里士满评分等同于对危重症患者镇静水平的评估。

Ramsay and Richmond's scores are equivalent to assessment sedation level on critical patients.

作者信息

Mendes Ciro Leite, Vasconcelos Lívia Carolina Santos, Tavares Jordana Soares, Fontan Silvia Borges, Ferreira Daniela Coelho, Diniz Lígia Almeida Carlos, Alves Elayne Souza, Villar Erick José Morais, Albuquerque César de Farias, Silva Sérgio Luz Domingues da

机构信息

Unidade de Terapia Intensiva, Hospital Universitário Lauro Wanderley, João Pessoa, PB, Brasil.

Clínica Médica, Hospital Universitário Lauro Wanderley, João Pessoa, PB, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2008 Dec;20(4):344-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The main purpose of this study was to compare performance of the Ramsay and Richmond sedation scores on mechanically ventilated critically ill patients, in a university-affiliated hospital.

METHODS

This was a 4-month prospective study, which included a total of 45 patients mechanically ventilated, with at least 48 hours stay in the intensive care unit. Each patient was assessed daily for sedation mode, sedative and analgesic doses and sedation level using the Ramsay and Richmond scores. Statistical analysis was made using Student's t-test, Pearson's and Spearman's correlation, and constructing ROC-curves.

RESULTS

A high general mortality of 60% was observed. The length of sedation and daily dose of medication did not correlate with mortality. Deep sedation (Ramsay > 4 or Richmond < -3) was positively correlated with probability of death with an AUC > 0.78. An adequate level of sedation (Ramsay 2 to 4 or Richmond 0 to -3) was sensitively correlated with probability of survival with an AUC > 0.80. A low level of sedation was observed in 63 days evaluated (8.64%), and no correlation was found between occurrence of agitation and unfavorable outcomes. Correlation between Ramsay and Richmond scores (Pearson's > 0.810 - p<0.0001) was good.

CONCLUSION

In this study, Ramsay and Richmond sedation scores were similar for the assessment of deep, insufficient and adequate sedation. Both have good correlation with mortality in over sedated patients.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是在一家大学附属医院中,比较Ramsay镇静评分和Richmond镇静评分在机械通气重症患者中的表现。

方法

这是一项为期4个月的前瞻性研究,共纳入45例机械通气患者,这些患者在重症监护病房至少停留48小时。每天使用Ramsay评分和Richmond评分对每位患者的镇静模式、镇静剂和镇痛剂剂量以及镇静水平进行评估。采用学生t检验、Pearson相关性分析、Spearman相关性分析以及构建ROC曲线进行统计分析。

结果

观察到总体死亡率较高,为60%。镇静时间和每日药物剂量与死亡率无关。深度镇静(Ramsay>4或Richmond<-3)与死亡概率呈正相关,AUC>0.78。适当的镇静水平(Ramsay 2至4或Richmond 0至-3)与生存概率呈显著相关,AUC>0.80。在评估的63天中观察到低水平镇静(8.64%),且未发现躁动的发生与不良结局之间存在相关性。Ramsay评分和Richmond评分之间的相关性良好(Pearson相关性>0.810 - p<0.0001)。

结论

在本研究中,Ramsay镇静评分和Richmond镇静评分在评估深度、不足和适当镇静方面相似。两者在过度镇静患者中与死亡率均具有良好的相关性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验