Department of Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Turku, Kaskenkatu 18 A 3, FI-20700 Turku, Finland; Unit of Adolescent Psychiatry, Satakunta Hospital District, Antinkatu 15 A, FI-28100 Pori, Finland.
Department of Biostatistics, University of Turku, Lemminkäisenkatu 1, FI-20520 Turku, Finland.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014 Nov-Dec;36(6):748-52. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
To investigate the possible causal link between alexithymia and the emergence of anxiety and depression symptoms, as well as alcohol consumption in a sample of late adolescents.
The nonclinical sample comprised late adolescents (n = 315), including both females (n = 256) and males (n = 59). The follow-up period was 4 years, and at baseline, the mean age of the subjects was 19 years (range 17-21 years). Alexithymia was measured with the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), depression symptoms with the short form of the Beck Depression Inventory (RBDI), anxiety with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and alcohol consumption with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). The three TAS-20 subscales were assessed separately. Linear and cumulative logistic regression analyses were used for the evaluation of associations, and the analyses were adjusted with the corresponding baseline scores.
The TAS-20 total and subscale scores did not predict the RBDI or AUDIT scores at follow-up. However, the TAS-20 subscale "difficulty identifying feelings" was significantly associated with both STAI-State (P = .007) and STAI-Trait (P = .004) scores at follow-up.
Alexithymic features may be individual predictors of later anxiety symptoms. The significant differences between the various dimensions of alexithymia should be considered in future studies.
探讨述情障碍与焦虑和抑郁症状以及酒精消费在青少年后期样本中的可能因果关系。
非临床样本包括青少年后期(n=315),包括女性(n=256)和男性(n=59)。随访期为 4 年,在基线时,受试者的平均年龄为 19 岁(范围 17-21 岁)。使用多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS-20)测量述情障碍,使用贝克抑郁量表(RBDI)的短表测量抑郁症状,使用状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)测量焦虑症状,使用酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)测量酒精消费。分别评估 TAS-20 的三个子量表。使用线性和累积逻辑回归分析评估关联,并用相应的基线评分进行调整。
TAS-20 总分和子量表评分均不能预测随访时的 RBDI 或 AUDIT 评分。然而,TAS-20 子量表“识别情感困难”与随访时的 STAI-State(P=.007)和 STAI-Trait(P=.004)评分显著相关。
述情障碍特征可能是焦虑症状的个体预测因素。未来的研究应考虑述情障碍的不同维度之间的显著差异。