Wilson Michael, Welch Jonathan, Schuur Jeremiah, O'Laughlin Kelli, Cutler David
The Department of Emergency Medicine Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;21(10):1101-8. doi: 10.1111/acem.12486.
The objective was to measure the variation in missed diagnosis and costs of care for older acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) and to identify the hospital and ED characteristics associated with this variation.
Using 2004-2005 Medicare inpatient and outpatient records, the authors identified a cohort of AMI patients age 65 years and older who presented to the ED for initial care. The primary outcome was missed diagnosis of AMI, i.e., AMI hospital admission within 7 days of an ED discharge for a condition suggestive of cardiac ischemia. Costs were defined as Medicare hospital payments for all services associated with and immediately resulting from the ED evaluation. The effect of ED and hospital characteristics on quality and costs were estimated using multilevel models with hospital random effects.
There were 371,638 AMI patients age 65 and older included in the study, of whom 4,707 were discharged home from their initial ED visits and subsequently admitted to the hospital. The median unadjusted hospital-level missed diagnosis percentage was 0.52% (interquartile range [IQR] = 0 to 3.45%). ED characteristics protective of adverse outcomes include higher ED chest pain acuity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.23, 99% confidence interval [CI] = 0.19 to 0.27) and American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) certification (aOR = 0.60, 99% CI = 0.50 to 0.73). Protective hospital characteristics include larger hospital size (aOR = 0.46, 99% CI = 0.37 to 0.57) and academic status (aOR = 0.74, 99% CI = 0.58 to 0.94). All of these characteristics were associated with higher costs as well.
The proportion of missed AMI diagnoses and cost of care for patients age 65 years and older presenting to EDs with AMI varies across hospitals. Hospitals with more board-certified emergency physicians (EPs) and higher average acuity are associated with significantly higher quality. All hospital characteristics associated with better ED outcomes are associated with higher costs.
本研究旨在衡量老年急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者在急诊科(ED)就诊时漏诊情况及护理成本的差异,并确定与这种差异相关的医院和急诊科特征。
作者利用2004 - 2005年医疗保险住院和门诊记录,确定了一组65岁及以上因初始护理而到急诊科就诊的AMI患者。主要结局是AMI的漏诊,即因提示心脏缺血的病症在急诊科出院后7天内入院治疗的AMI患者。成本定义为医疗保险支付的与急诊科评估相关且直接产生的所有服务的医院费用。使用具有医院随机效应的多层次模型估计急诊科和医院特征对质量和成本的影响。
本研究纳入了371,638例65岁及以上的AMI患者,其中4,707例在首次急诊科就诊后出院回家,随后入院治疗。未调整的医院层面漏诊率中位数为0.52%(四分位间距[IQR]=0至3.45%)。对不良结局具有保护作用的急诊科特征包括更高的急诊科胸痛严重程度(调整后的优势比[aOR]=0.23,99%置信区间[CI]=0.19至0.27)和美国急诊医学委员会(ABEM)认证(aOR = 0.60,99% CI = 0.50至0.73)。具有保护作用的医院特征包括更大的医院规模(aOR = 0.46,99% CI = 0.37至0.57)和学术地位(aOR = 0.74,99% CI = 0.58至0.94)。所有这些特征也都与更高的成本相关。
65岁及以上因AMI到急诊科就诊的患者中,AMI漏诊比例和护理成本在不同医院之间存在差异。拥有更多经委员会认证的急诊医师(EP)且平均严重程度更高的医院,其医疗质量显著更高。所有与更好的急诊科结局相关的医院特征都与更高的成本相关。