Griffey Richard T, Kennedy Sarah K, D'Agostino McGowan Lucy, Goodman Melody, Kaphingst Kimberly A
The Division of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;21(10):1109-15. doi: 10.1111/acem.12476.
The objective was to determine whether patients with low health literacy have higher emergency department (ED) utilization and higher ED recidivism than patients with adequate health literacy.
The study was conducted at an urban academic ED with more than 95,000 annual visits that is part of a 13-hospital health system, using electronic records that are captured in a central data repository. As part of a larger, cross-sectional, convenience sample study, health literacy testing was performed using the short test of functional health literacy in adults (S-TOFHLA) and standard test thresholds identifying those with inadequate, marginal, and adequate health literacy. The authors collected patients' demographic and clinical data, including items known to affect recidivism. This was a structured electronic record review directed at determining 1) the median number of total ED visits in this health system within a 2-year period and 2) the proportion of patients with each level of health literacy who had return visits within 3, 7, and 14 days of index visits. Descriptive data for demographics and ED returns are reported, stratified by health literacy level. The Mantel-Haenszel chi-square was used to test whether there is an association between health literacy and ED recidivism. A negative binomial multivariable model was performed to examine whether health literacy affects ED use, including variables significant at the 0.1 alpha level on bivariate analysis and retaining those significant at an alpha of 0.05 in the final model.
Among 431 patients evaluated, 13.2% had inadequate, 10% had marginal, and 76.3% had adequate health literacy as identified by S-TOFHLA. Patients with inadequate health literacy had higher ED utilization compared to those with adequate health literacy (p = 0.03). Variables retained in the final model included S-TOFHLA score, number of medications, having a personal doctor, being a property owner, race, insurance, age, and simple comorbidity score. During the study period, 118 unique patients each made at least one return ED visit within a 14-day period. The proportion of patients with inadequate health literacy making at least one return visit was higher than that of patients with adequate health literacy at 14 days, but was not significantly higher within 3 or 7 days.
In this single-center study, higher utilization of the ED by patients with inadequate health literacy when compared to those with adequate health literacy was observed. Patients with inadequate health literacy made a higher number of return visits at 14 days but not at 3 or 7 days.
本研究旨在确定健康素养较低的患者与健康素养充足的患者相比,是否有更高的急诊科(ED)利用率和更高的ED再就诊率。
本研究在一家城市学术性急诊科进行,该急诊科每年就诊量超过95000人次,是一个由13家医院组成的医疗系统的一部分,研究使用在中央数据存储库中捕获的电子记录。作为一项更大规模的横断面便利样本研究的一部分,使用成人功能性健康素养简短测试(S-TOFHLA)进行健康素养测试,并采用标准测试阈值来识别健康素养不足、边缘和充足的患者。作者收集了患者的人口统计学和临床数据,包括已知会影响再就诊率的项目。这是一项结构化的电子记录审查,旨在确定:1)该医疗系统内2年内ED就诊总数的中位数;2)不同健康素养水平的患者在首次就诊后3天、7天和14天内再次就诊的比例。报告按健康素养水平分层的人口统计学和ED复诊的描述性数据。使用Mantel-Haenszel卡方检验来测试健康素养与ED再就诊率之间是否存在关联。进行负二项式多变量模型以检查健康素养是否影响ED就诊情况,包括在双变量分析中在0.1的α水平上显著的变量,并在最终模型中保留在α为0.05时显著的变量。
在431名接受评估的患者中,根据S-TOFHLA测试,13.2%的患者健康素养不足,10%的患者健康素养处于边缘水平,76.3%的患者健康素养充足。与健康素养充足的患者相比,健康素养不足的患者ED利用率更高(p = 0.03)。最终模型中保留的变量包括S-TOFHLA评分、用药数量、是否有私人医生、是否为业主、种族、保险、年龄和简单合并症评分。在研究期间,118名不同的患者在14天内各自至少进行了一次ED复诊。健康素养不足的患者在14天内至少进行一次复诊的比例高于健康素养充足的患者,但在3天或7天内并没有显著更高。
在这项单中心研究中,观察到健康素养不足的患者与健康素养充足的患者相比,ED利用率更高。健康素养不足的患者在14天内的复诊次数更多,但在3天或7天内并非如此。