Wang Ping, Xue Yiqun, Zhao Xia, Yu Jiangsheng, Rosen Mark, Song Hee Kwon
Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Department of Radiology & Radiological Sciences, Nashville, TN, USA.
Laboratory for Structural NMR Imaging, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Jan;33(1):166-73. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI is becoming an increasingly important tool to assess tumors and their response to treatment. In the most common method of computing tumor perfusion parameters, the concentration of the injected contrast agent is first computed in both tumor and blood which is subsequently fit to a perfusion model, typically the Tofts two compartment model. However, this strategy can be highly sensitive to errors in the excitation flip angle and noise. More recently, a simpler method of determining perfusion was developed in which the difference signal, obtained by subtracting the measured time course signal by the signal prior to bolus arrival, is utilized in lieu of the concentration values. The goal of this work is to compare the performance of these two strategies with simulation experiments in the presence of flip angle errors and different levels of image signal to noise ratios (SNRs). Results show that with the conventional method, if assumed pre-contrast T1 of blood is used, large errors in perfusion (exceeding 400% and 200% for K(trans) and ve, respectively) can occur in the presence of flip angle deviations typically observed in vivo. However, when baseline T1 values are measured for both tumor and blood, the errors become a function of flip angle difference between the two locations, with nearly no error if the flip angle errors are identical at both locations. The errors are substantially smaller with the signal difference strategy (less than 100% for both K(trans) and ve). The latter method also yields more consistent perfusion values at varying SNR levels. The results suggest that measuring the actual flip angle may be critical for obtaining absolute perfusion values, but in studies in which relative changes in perfusion is of primary interest or if true flip angles are not known, the signal difference strategy may be preferred over the standard concentration-based method.
动态对比增强磁共振成像正日益成为评估肿瘤及其对治疗反应的重要工具。在计算肿瘤灌注参数的最常见方法中,首先要计算肿瘤和血液中注入的造影剂浓度,随后将其拟合到灌注模型,通常是Tofts双室模型。然而,这种策略对激发翻转角和噪声中的误差可能高度敏感。最近,开发了一种更简单的确定灌注的方法,即利用通过将测量的时间历程信号减去团注到达前的信号而获得的差值信号来代替浓度值。这项工作的目的是通过模拟实验比较这两种策略在存在翻转角误差和不同图像信噪比(SNR)水平时的性能。结果表明,采用传统方法时,如果使用假定的血液造影前T1值,在体内通常观察到的翻转角偏差情况下,灌注可能会出现较大误差(K(trans)和ve分别超过400%和200%)。然而,当测量肿瘤和血液的基线T1值时,误差成为两个位置之间翻转角差异的函数,如果两个位置的翻转角误差相同,则几乎没有误差。采用信号差值策略时误差要小得多(K(trans)和ve均小于100%)。后一种方法在不同SNR水平下也能产生更一致的灌注值。结果表明,测量实际翻转角对于获得绝对灌注值可能至关重要,但在主要关注灌注相对变化的研究中,或者如果真实翻转角未知,信号差值策略可能比基于标准浓度的方法更可取。