Suppr超能文献

[厦门膳食食品中增塑剂的暴露风险评估]

[Exposure risk assessment of plasticizer in dietary food in Xiamen].

作者信息

Zhuang Qunying, Yang Yue, Su Yanhua, Lyu Chanwen, Wang Sumei, Yu Huan, Qin Mengting, Li Yanni, Zhao Benhua

机构信息

School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China.

Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Jul;48(7):602-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To understand the dietary consumption of residents in Xiamen and the content of phthalic acid esters (PAEs) in food, and to assess the plasticizer exposure risk of diet in Xiamen.

METHODS

The survey was conducted by stratified cluster random sampling method in Xiamen from September to October in 2010. According to the Xiamen administrative division, six neighborhood communities were selected as sampling units, then 25 families were randomly chosen from each sampling units.From the above 150 families, the permanent residents over the age of six were permitted to our study. The survey included 495 residents totally. These participants' information, such as basic personal information, physical activity levels, meal frequency and the average consumption of 33 kinds of food in 13 categories were collected using questionnaires. Thirteen categories included cereal and tubers, beans, vegetables, fungi and algae, fruits, dairy products, meat, seafood, eggs, snacks, beverages, cooking oil and spices. The height and weight of residents were measured and the average daily dietary intake was calculated. Thirty-three kinds of food in 13 categories were collected in supermarkets in Xiamen. According to the annual sales ranking, the top three-five brands of each kinds of food were selected and numbered, then two or three brands were chosen by random number table method from them; three completely individual packed samples in the same batch of each brand were detected; 243 samples were included in our study.100-500 g solid samples or 100-500 ml liquid samples were collected. The content of diethyl phthalate (DEP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP), di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) in food were detected by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry, which expressed by median (minimum-maximum). The exposure dose, contribution rate and risk index of PAEs were calculated by point estimation method.

RESULTS

According to the average daily dietary intake of residents in Xiamen, the top three ones in 13 categories of food were cereal and tubers (337.16 g/d, 18.21%), vegetables (309.12 g/d, 16.69%) and fruits (213.20 g/d, 11.51%). The content of DEP, DBP or DEHP among different categories of food was significantly different (χ² values were 58.05, 50.19 and 102.10, P < 0.01). Among 13 categories of food, seafood contained the most DEP (0.090 (0.000-0.324)mg/kg); cooking oil had the most DBP (0.700(0.000-2.980) mg/kg) and DEHP (5.115(0.000-24.160) mg/kg). DEP, DBP and DEHP exposure(0.19, 4.20, 18.10 µg × kg⁻¹ ×d ⁻¹)in dietary food in Xiamen were less than the reference dose(RfD) (800, 100, 20 µg × kg⁻¹ × d⁻¹) proposed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the risk indexes were 0.02%, 4.20% and 90.50%, respectively. Among 13 categories of foods, seafood was the main source of DEP dietary exposure. The exposure dose and contribution rate of DEP in seafood were 0.18 µg × kg⁻¹ × d⁻¹ and 94.74%, respectively.Vegetables were the main source of DBP and DEHP dietary exposure. The exposure dose and contribution rate of DBP and DEHP were 1.48 µg × kg⁻¹ × d⁻¹, 35.24% and 6.07 µg × kg⁻¹ × d⁻¹, 33.54%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The food consumed by residents in Xiamen was overall in a safe state, but to some extent, there still exists DEHP exposure risk in foods.

摘要

目的

了解厦门居民的膳食消费情况以及食品中邻苯二甲酸酯(PAEs)的含量,评估厦门居民膳食中增塑剂的暴露风险。

方法

于2010年9月至10月采用分层整群随机抽样方法在厦门进行调查。根据厦门行政区划,选取6个社区居委会作为抽样单位,再从每个抽样单位中随机抽取25户家庭。从上述150户家庭中,允许6岁以上常住人口参与本研究。共纳入495名居民。通过问卷调查收集这些参与者的基本个人信息、身体活动水平、进餐频率以及13类33种食物的平均消费量等信息。13类食物包括谷类和薯类、豆类、蔬菜、菌藻类、水果、乳制品、肉类、海鲜、蛋类、零食、饮料、食用油和调味品。测量居民的身高和体重并计算平均每日膳食摄入量。在厦门超市收集13类33种食物。根据年销售额排名,选取各类食物排名前三至五位的品牌并编号,然后通过随机数表法从中选取两至三个品牌;对每个品牌同一批次的三个完全独立包装样本进行检测;共纳入243个样本。收集100 - 500 g固体样本或100 - 500 ml液体样本。采用液相色谱质谱法检测食品中邻苯二甲酸二乙酯(DEP)、邻苯二甲酸二丁酯(DBP)、邻苯二甲酸二(2 - 乙基己基)酯(DEHP)的含量,以中位数(最小值 - 最大值)表示。采用点估计法计算PAEs的暴露剂量、贡献率和风险指数。

结果

根据厦门居民平均每日膳食摄入量,13类食物中摄入量排名前三的是谷类和薯类(337.16 g/d,18.21%)、蔬菜(309.12 g/d,16.​​69%)和水果(213.20 g/d,11.51%)。不同类别食物中DEP、DBP或DEHP的含量差异有统计学意义(χ²值分别为58.05、50.19和102.10,P < 0.01)。在13类食物中,海鲜中DEP含量最高(0.090(0.000 - 0.​​324)mg/kg);食用油中DBP含量最高(0.700(0.000 - 2.980)mg/kg),DEHP含量最高(5.115(0.000 - 24.160)mg/kg)。厦门膳食食品中DEP、DBP和DEHP的暴露量(0.19、4.20、18.10 μg×kg⁻¹×d⁻¹)低于美国环境保护局(EPA)提出的参考剂量(RfD)(800、100、20 μg×kg⁻¹×d⁻¹),风险指数分别为0.02%、4.20%和90.50%。在13类食物中,海鲜是膳食中DEP暴露的主要来源。海鲜中DEP的暴露剂量和贡献率分别为0.18 μg×kg⁻¹×d⁻¹和94.74%。蔬菜是膳食中DBP和DEHP暴露的主要来源。DBP和DEHP的暴露剂量和贡献率分别为1.48 μg×kg⁻¹×d⁻¹、35.24%和6.07 μg×kg⁻¹× d⁻¹、33.54%。

结论

厦门居民食用的食物总体处于安全状态,但在一定程度上,食品中仍存在DEHP暴露风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验