Dodd Jodie M, McPhee Andrew J, Turnbull Deborah, Yelland Lisa N, Deussen Andrea R, Grivell Rosalie M, Crowther Caroline A, Wittert Gary, Owens Julie A, Robinson Jeffrey S
The University of Adelaide, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
The Women's and Children's Hospital, Women's and Babies Division, Department of Perinatal Medicine, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
BMC Med. 2014 Oct 13;12:163. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0163-9.
Overweight and obesity during pregnancy represents a considerable health burden. While research has focused on interventions to limit gestational weight gain, there is little information describing their impact on neonatal health. Our aim was to investigate the effect on a range of pre-specified secondary neonatal outcomes of providing antenatal dietary and lifestyle advice to women who are overweight or obese.
We report a range of pre-specified secondary neonatal outcomes from a large randomised trial in which antenatal dietary and lifestyle advice was provided to women who were overweight or obese. Pregnant women were eligible for participation with a body mass index of 25 kg/m(2) or over, and singleton gestation between 10(+0) and 20(+0) weeks. Outcome measures included gestational age at birth; Apgar score below 7 at 5 minutes of age; need for resuscitation at birth; birth weight above 4.5 kg or below 2.5 kg; birth weight, length and head circumference (and Z-scores); admission to the nursery; respiratory distress syndrome; and postnatal length of stay. Data relating to the primary outcome (large for gestational age infants defined as birth weight above the 90th centile) and birth weight above 4 kg have been reported previously. Analyses used intention-to-treat principles.
In total, 2,142 infants were included in the analyses. Infants born to women following lifestyle advice were significantly less likely to have birth weight above 4.5 kg (2.15% versus 3.69%; adjusted risk ratio (aRR)=0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36 to 0.98; P=0.04), or respiratory distress syndrome (1.22% versus 2.57%; aRR=0.47; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.90; P=0.02), particularly moderate or severe disease, and had a shorter length of postnatal hospital stay (3.94±7.26 days versus 4.41±9.87 days; adjusted ratio of means 0.89; 95% CI 0.82 to 0.97; P=0.006) compared with infants born to women who received Standard Care.
For women who are overweight or obese, antenatal dietary and lifestyle advice has health benefits for infants, without an increase in the risk of harm. Continued follow-up into childhood will be important to assess the longer-term effects of a reduction in high infant birth weight on risk of child obesity. Please see related articles: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/12/161 and http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/12/201 .
Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12607000161426 ).
孕期超重和肥胖带来了相当大的健康负担。尽管研究主要集中在限制孕期体重增加的干预措施上,但关于这些措施对新生儿健康影响的信息却很少。我们的目的是调查为超重或肥胖女性提供产前饮食和生活方式建议对一系列预先设定的次要新生儿结局的影响。
我们报告了一项大型随机试验中一系列预先设定的次要新生儿结局,该试验为超重或肥胖女性提供了产前饮食和生活方式建议。孕妇体重指数达到25kg/m²及以上且单胎妊娠10(+0)至20(+0)周时符合参与条件。结局指标包括出生时的孕周;出生5分钟时阿氏评分低于7分;出生时需要复苏;出生体重高于4.5kg或低于2.5kg;出生体重、身长和头围(及Z评分);入住新生儿重症监护室;呼吸窘迫综合征;以及产后住院时间。与主要结局(出生体重高于第90百分位数定义的大于胎龄儿)和出生体重高于4kg相关的数据此前已报告。分析采用意向性分析原则。
总计2142名婴儿纳入分析。接受生活方式建议的女性所生婴儿出生体重高于4.5kg的可能性显著降低(2.15%对3.69%;调整风险比(aRR)=0.59;95%置信区间(CI)0.36至0.98;P=0.04),或患呼吸窘迫综合征的可能性降低(1.22%对2.57%;aRR=0.47;95%CI0.24至0.9;P=0.02),尤其是中重度疾病,且产后住院时间较短(3.94±7.26天对4.41±9.87天;调整均值比0.89;95%CI0.82至0.97;P=0.006),与接受标准护理的女性所生婴儿相比。
对于超重或肥胖女性,产前饮食和生活方式建议对婴儿有益,且不会增加伤害风险。持续随访至儿童期对于评估降低高出生体重婴儿对儿童肥胖风险的长期影响很重要。请参阅相关文章:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/12/161和http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/12/201。
澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12607000161426)