Yan Chenhua, Xu Lanping, Liu Daihong, Chen Huan, Wang Yu, Liu Kaiyan, Huang Xiaojun
Department of Hematology, Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing 100044, China.
Department of Hematology, Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing 100044, China. Email:
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(20):3602-9.
In haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), the duration of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after modified donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) was the only risk factor of DLI-associated grades 3-4 acute GVHD. However, the successful application of modified DLI depended not only on the reduction of severe GVHD, but also on the preservation of graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. Therefore, this study was performed to compare the impact of prophylaxis for 6-8 weeks and prophylaxis for <6 weeks on GVL effect after modified DLI in haploidentical HSCT.
A total of 103 consecutive patients developing hematological relapse or minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive status after haploidentical HSCT and receiving modified DLI were investigated retrospectively. Fifty-two patients received prophylaxis for 6-8 weeks after modified DLI; the remaining 51 patients received prophylaxis for <6 weeks.
First, compared with prophylaxis for <6 weeks, prophylaxis for 6-8 weeks reduced incidence of relapse in total patients (26.6% vs. 69.0%, P < 0.001). Besides, prophylaxis for 6-8 weeks also reduced incidence of relapse in 54 patients developing hematological relapse post-transplant (P = 0.018) and in 49 patients developing MRD-positive status post-transplant (P < 0.001). Second, prophylaxis for 6-8 weeks reduced incidence of acute GVHD (P < 0.05), reduced the therapeutic application of immunosuppressive agents (P = 0.019), but increased the incidence of chronic GVHD (P < 0.05). Third, prophylaxis for 6-8 weeks improved overall survival and disease-free survival in total patients, as well as in patients developing hematological relapse post-transplant and in patients developing MRD-positive status post-transplant (P < 0.05).
In haploidentical HSCT, prophylaxis for 6-8 weeks after modified DLI does not reduce GVL effect, but reduces the incidence of DLI-associated acute GVHD compared with prophylaxis for <6 weeks. This strategy will probably improve the safety and efficacy of modified DLI further.
在单倍体造血干细胞移植(HSCT)中,改良供体淋巴细胞输注(DLI)后移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)预防的持续时间是DLI相关3-4级急性GVHD的唯一危险因素。然而,改良DLI的成功应用不仅取决于严重GVHD的减少,还取决于移植物抗白血病(GVL)效应的保留。因此,本研究旨在比较单倍体HSCT中改良DLI后6-8周预防和<6周预防对GVL效应的影响。
回顾性研究了103例单倍体HSCT后发生血液学复发或微小残留病(MRD)阳性状态并接受改良DLI的连续患者。52例患者在改良DLI后接受6-8周预防;其余51例患者接受预防时间<6周。
首先,与<6周预防相比,6-8周预防降低了总患者的复发率(26.6%对69.0%,P<0.001)。此外,6-8周预防还降低了54例移植后发生血液学复发患者的复发率(P=0.018)和49例移植后发生MRD阳性状态患者的复发率(P<0.001)。其次,6-8周预防降低了急性GVHD的发生率(P<0.05),减少了免疫抑制剂的治疗应用(P=0.019),但增加了慢性GVHD的发生率(P<0.05)。第三,6-8周预防改善了总患者以及移植后发生血液学复发患者和移植后发生MRD阳性状态患者的总生存和无病生存(P<0.05)。
在单倍体HSCT中,改良DLI后6-8周预防与<6周预防相比,不会降低GVL效应,但可降低DLI相关急性GVHD的发生率。该策略可能会进一步提高改良DLI的安全性和有效性。