• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与英国医学总会能力测试的医生:谁会自愿参与以及原因何在?

Doctors who pilot the GMC's Tests of Competence: who volunteers and why?

作者信息

Mehdizadeh Leila, Sturrock Alison, Myers Gil, Khatib Yasmin, Dacre Jane

机构信息

Division of University College London Medical School, University College London, London, UK.

Centre for Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

Postgrad Med J. 2014 Dec;90(1070):675-9. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2013-132324. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1136/postgradmedj-2013-132324
PMID:25316795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4283686/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Doctors who are investigated by the General Medical Council for performance concerns may be required to take a Test of Competence (ToC). The tests are piloted on volunteer doctors before they are used in Fitness to Practise (FtP) investigations.

OBJECTIVES

To find out who volunteers to take a pilot ToC and why.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study. Between February 2011 and October 2012 we asked doctors who volunteered for a test to complete a questionnaire about their reasons for volunteering and recruitment. We analysed the data using descriptive statistics and Pearson's χ(2) test.

RESULTS

301 doctors completed the questionnaire. Doctors who took a ToC voluntarily were mostly women, of white ethnicity, of junior grades, working in general practice and who held a Primary Medical Qualification (PMQ) from the UK. This was a different population to doctors under investigation and all registered doctors in the UK. Most volunteers heard about the General Medical Council's pilot events through email from a colleague and used the experience to gain exam practice for forthcoming postgraduate exams.

CONCLUSIONS

The reference groups of volunteers are not representative of doctors under FtP investigation. Our findings will be used to inform future recruitment strategies with the aim to encourage better matching of groups who voluntarily pilot a ToC with those under FtP investigation.

摘要

背景

因执业表现问题受到英国医学总会调查的医生可能需要参加能力测试(ToC)。这些测试在用于执业适合性(FtP)调查之前,会先在志愿医生身上进行试点。

目的

了解哪些医生自愿参加试点ToC以及原因。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究。在2011年2月至2012年10月期间,我们要求自愿参加测试的医生填写一份关于他们自愿参与及招募原因的问卷。我们使用描述性统计和Pearson卡方检验分析数据。

结果

301名医生完成了问卷。自愿参加ToC的医生大多为女性,白人,初级职称,从事全科医疗工作,拥有英国初级医学资格(PMQ)。这与接受调查的医生以及英国所有注册医生的群体不同。大多数志愿者通过同事的电子邮件听说了英国医学总会的试点活动,并利用这次经历为即将到来的研究生考试进行考试练习。

结论

志愿者的参照群体并不代表接受FtP调查的医生。我们的研究结果将用于为未来的招募策略提供信息,目的是鼓励自愿参加ToC试点的群体与接受FtP调查的群体更好地匹配。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de70/4283686/91ae006ff3d7/postgradmedj-2013-132324f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de70/4283686/64b26da08b73/postgradmedj-2013-132324f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de70/4283686/91ae006ff3d7/postgradmedj-2013-132324f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de70/4283686/64b26da08b73/postgradmedj-2013-132324f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de70/4283686/91ae006ff3d7/postgradmedj-2013-132324f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Doctors who pilot the GMC's Tests of Competence: who volunteers and why?参与英国医学总会能力测试的医生:谁会自愿参与以及原因何在?
Postgrad Med J. 2014 Dec;90(1070):675-9. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2013-132324. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
2
Are the General Medical Council's Tests of Competence fair to long standing doctors? A retrospective cohort study.英国医学总会的能力测试对长期执业的医生公平吗?一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Apr 21;15:80. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0362-x.
3
Place of medical qualification and outcomes of UK General Medical Council "fitness to practise" process: cohort study.英国医学总会“适合行医”程序的医疗资格地点和结果:队列研究。
BMJ. 2011 Apr 5;342:d1817. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1817.
4
Prevalence of GMC performance assessments in the United Kingdom: a retrospective cohort analysis by country of medical qualification.英国通用医疗委员会绩效评估的患病率:按医学资格国家进行的回顾性队列分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Apr 4;17(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0903-6.
5
Fitness to practise sanctions in UK doctors are predicted by poor performance at MRCGP and MRCP(UK) assessments: data linkage study.英国医生的行医能力制裁预测依据为 MRCGP 和 MRCP(UK)评估中的表现不佳:数据关联研究。
BMC Med. 2018 Dec 7;16(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1214-4.
6
Predicting fitness to practise events in international medical graduates who registered as UK doctors via the Professional and Linguistic Assessments Board (PLAB) system: a national cohort study.预测通过专业语言评估委员会(PLAB)系统注册为英国医生的国际医学毕业生的行医适宜性事件:一项全国队列研究。
BMC Med. 2017 Mar 20;15(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0829-1.
7
Passing MRCP (UK) PACES: a cross-sectional study examining the performance of doctors by sex and country.通过 MRCP(英国)PACES:一项按性别和国家划分的医生表现的横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Apr 6;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1178-2.
8
UK nationals who received their medical degrees abroad: selection into, and subsequent performance in postgraduate training: a national data linkage study.在国外获得医学学位的英国国民:研究生培训的选拔及后续表现:一项全国性数据关联研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 10;8(7):e023060. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023060.
9
Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) performance of doctors who passed Professional and Linguistic Assessments Board (PLAB) tests compared with UK medical graduates: national data linkage study.通过专业和语言评估委员会 (PLAB) 考试的医生与英国医学毕业生的年度能力进展评估 (ARCP) 绩效比较:全国数据链接研究。
BMJ. 2014 Apr 17;348:g2622. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2622.
10
Duties of a doctor: UK doctors and good medical practice.医生的职责:英国医生与良好医疗实践
Qual Health Care. 2000 Mar;9(1):14-22. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.1.14.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex differences in fitness to practise test scores: a cohort study of GPs.性别差异与执业能力测试分数:对全科医生的队列研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Apr;69(681):e287-e293. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X701789. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
2
Are the General Medical Council's Tests of Competence fair to long standing doctors? A retrospective cohort study.英国医学总会的能力测试对长期执业的医生公平吗?一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Apr 21;15:80. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0362-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical students' self-assessment of performance: results from three meta-analyses.医学生自我评估表现:三项荟萃分析的结果。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Jul;84(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.06.037. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
2
Medical student gender and issues of confidence.医学生的性别与自信心问题。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Sep;72(3):374-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.05.021. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
3
Medical students' perceptions of medical education research and their roles as participants.
Acad Med. 2005 Aug;80(8):780-5. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200508000-00016.
4
The General Medical Council's Performance Procedures: peer review of performance in the workplace.英国医学总会的绩效程序:工作场所绩效的同行评审
Med Educ. 2001 Dec;35 Suppl 1:9-19. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.0350s1009.x.
5
UK doctors' attitudes to the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures, 1997-99.1997 - 1999年英国医生对英国医学总会绩效程序的态度。
Med Educ. 2001 Dec;35 Suppl 1:60-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.0350s1060.x.
6
The General Medical Council's Performance Procedures: the development and implementation of tests of competence with examples from general practice.英国医学总会的绩效程序:能力测试的制定与实施,并附全科医疗实例
Med Educ. 2001 Dec;35 Suppl 1:20-8.
7
The assessment of poorly performing doctors: the development of the assessment programmes for the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures.表现不佳医生的评估:英国医学总会绩效程序评估方案的制定。
Med Educ. 2001 Dec;35 Suppl 1:2-8.
8
Problems in recruiting community-based physicians for health services research.为卫生服务研究招募社区医生时遇到的问题。
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Aug;15(8):591-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.02329.x.