• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过雷诺嗪缓解心绞痛可识别出经冠状动脉造影证实患有冠心病患者的单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)心肌灌注扫描假阴性结果。

Angina Relief by Ranolazine Identifies False-Negative SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Scans in Patients with Coronary Disease Demonstrated by Coronary Angiography.

作者信息

Murray Gary L

机构信息

Director Medical Research, Heart and Vascular Institute, Germantown, Tennessee.

出版信息

Int J Angiol. 2014 Sep;23(3):165-70. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1382290.

DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1382290
PMID:25317027
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4169097/
Abstract

Normal myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) reduces intermediate- or high-risk pretest probability patients to low- or intermediate-risk posttest probability, respectively, for coronary disease (CD). Since ranolazine (RAN) relieves only angina, anginal patients with normal MPI whose angina is relieved by RAN present a significant dilemma. The purpose of this retrospective chart review was to confirm the impression that coronary angiography (CA) is indicated in patients whose class 3 to 4 angina is relieved by RAN, but have normal myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) MPIs. Charts of patients with stable class 3 to 4 angina (typical and atypical) and normal MPIs (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≥50% and segmental score = 0) were reviewed. CA was done on all the patients with complete angina relief taking RAN, as well as nonresponders whose anginal etiology could not be explained. Stenoses were considered flow-restrictive when more than 70% diameter stenosis is observed by quantitative CA, or, when 50 to 70%, fractional flow reserve (FFR) measured ≤0.80. RAN relieved angina in 36 of 54 (67%) patients. Of the known cases, 25 of these 36 (69%) had 43 stenoses ≥50% (mean = 66%): 15 (60%) had 1 vessel disease; 9 (36%) had multivessel disease; 18 (72%) had left anterior descending (LAD) disease; 1 (4%) had left main disease. Twenty one of 43 (49%) stenosis were > 70%; 22 (51%) stenoses were 50 to 70% and required FFR measurement. Twenty nine of 43 stenoses (67%) were considered flow-restrictive in 18 of these 25 (72%) patients. Eight RAN nonresponders with no explanation for angina had no CD at CA. RAN angina relief is invaluable in identifying falsely negative SPECT MPI, and 50% of these patients have flow-restrictive stenoses.

摘要

正常心肌灌注成像(MPI)可分别将冠心病(CD)中、高风险的检测前概率患者降低至低风险或中风险的检测后概率。由于雷诺嗪(RAN)仅能缓解心绞痛,对于MPI正常且心绞痛可被RAN缓解的心绞痛患者而言,这是一个重大难题。本回顾性病历审查的目的是证实以下观点:对于3至4级心绞痛经RAN缓解但心肌单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)MPI正常的患者,冠状动脉造影(CA)是必要的。对稳定型3至4级心绞痛(典型和非典型)且MPI正常(左心室射血分数[LVEF]≥50%且节段评分=0)的患者病历进行了审查。对所有服用RAN后心绞痛完全缓解的患者以及心绞痛病因无法解释的无反应者均进行了CA检查。当定量CA观察到直径狭窄超过70%,或狭窄50%至70%时,血流储备分数(FFR)测量≤0.80,则认为狭窄具有血流限制性。54例患者中有36例(67%)的心绞痛被RAN缓解。在已知病例中,这36例中的25例(69%)有43处狭窄≥50%(平均=66%):15例(60%)为单支血管病变;9例(36%)为多支血管病变;18例(72%)有左前降支(LAD)病变;1例(4%)有左主干病变。43处狭窄中有21处(49%)>70%;22处(51%)狭窄为50%至70%,需要测量FFR。43处狭窄中有29处(67%)在这25例患者中的18例(72%)中被认为具有血流限制性。8例对RAN无反应且心绞痛无法解释的患者在CA检查中未发现冠心病。RAN缓解心绞痛对于识别SPECT MPI假阴性非常重要,这些患者中有50%存在血流限制性狭窄。

相似文献

1
Angina Relief by Ranolazine Identifies False-Negative SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Scans in Patients with Coronary Disease Demonstrated by Coronary Angiography.通过雷诺嗪缓解心绞痛可识别出经冠状动脉造影证实患有冠心病患者的单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)心肌灌注扫描假阴性结果。
Int J Angiol. 2014 Sep;23(3):165-70. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1382290.
2
Tc-99m sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.^99m^Tc sestamibi 单光子发射计算机断层扫描引导多血管病变患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:与定量冠状动脉造影和血流储备分数的比较。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Feb;26(2):203-13. doi: 10.1007/s10554-009-9510-x. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
3
Quantitative evaluation improves specificity of myocardial perfusion SPECT in the assessment of functionally significant intermediate coronary artery stenoses: a comparative study with fractional flow reserve measurements.定量评估提高了心肌灌注 SPECT 在评估功能性中度冠状动脉狭窄中的特异性:与血流储备分数测量的对比研究。
Ann Nucl Med. 2013 Feb;27(2):132-9. doi: 10.1007/s12149-012-0666-4. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
4
Prospective comparison of integrated on-site CT-fractional flow reserve and static CT perfusion with coronary CT angiography for detection of flow-limiting coronary stenosis.前瞻性比较整合的 CT 现场分段血流储备分数和 CT 灌注与冠状动脉 CT 血管造影用于检测限制血流的冠状动脉狭窄。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jul;31(7):5096-5105. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07508-y. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
5
Prediction of Flow-Limiting Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease Based on Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.基于定量心肌灌注成像对稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者血流限制性血流储备分数的预测
Am J Cardiol. 2016 May 1;117(9):1417-26. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
6
Anatomically and functionally relevant coronary stenoses in patients with normal single-photon emission computed tomography but persistent stable angina.在单光子发射计算机断层扫描正常但持续性稳定型心绞痛的患者中,存在解剖学和功能相关的冠状动脉狭窄。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Dec 1;19(12):1327-1333. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jey126.
7
Prospective Comparison of FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography With SPECT Perfusion Imaging in Stable Coronary Artery Disease: The ReASSESS Study.稳定型冠状动脉疾病中冠状动脉 CT 血管造影衍生的 FFR 与 SPECT 灌注成像的前瞻性比较:ReASSESS 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Nov;11(11):1640-1650. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
8
Fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with angiographic multivessel coronary artery disease.血管造影多支冠状动脉疾病患者的血流储备分数和心肌灌注成像。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Mar;3(3):307-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.12.010.
9
[Fractional flow reserve as a deciding criterion for intervention in patients with 50% coronary stenoses and impaired myocardial perfusion].[血流储备分数作为50%冠状动脉狭窄且心肌灌注受损患者干预治疗的决定标准]
Z Kardiol. 2000 Apr;89(4):307-15. doi: 10.1007/s003920050490.
10
SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Reserve in Patients with Multivessel Coronary Disease: Correlation with Angiographic Findings and Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements.多支冠状动脉疾病患者的单光子发射计算机断层扫描心肌灌注储备:与血管造影结果及有创血流储备分数测量的相关性
J Nucl Med. 2015 Nov;56(11):1712-7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.143164. Epub 2015 Sep 3.

本文引用的文献

1
2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.2012年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会/美国内科医师学会/美国胸外科医师协会/预防心血管护士协会/心血管造影和介入学会/胸外科医师学会稳定型缺血性心脏病患者诊断和管理指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组、美国内科医师学会、美国胸外科医师协会、预防心血管护士协会、心血管造影和介入学会以及胸外科医师学会的报告
Circulation. 2012 Dec 18;126(25):3097-137. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182776f83. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
2
Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease.临界血流储备分数指导下的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与稳定型冠心病的药物治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):991-1001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205361. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
3
Long-term prognostic value of exercise technetium-99m tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography.运动状态下锝-99m 甲氧基异丁基异腈心肌灌注单光子发射计算机断层扫描的长期预后价值。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Oct;19(5):907-13. doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9585-y. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
4
ACCF/SCAI/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2012 appropriate use criteria for diagnostic catheterization: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.美国心脏病学会基金会适宜性使用标准专家组、心血管造影和介入学会、美国胸外科学会、美国心脏协会、美国超声心动图学会、美国核医学学会、美国心力衰竭学会、心律学会、重症医学会、心血管计算机断层扫描学会、心血管磁共振学会以及胸外科医师学会 2012 年诊断性心导管术适宜性使用标准:美国心脏病学会基金会适宜性使用标准专家组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 May 29;59(22):1995-2027. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 May 9.
5
Functional measurement of coronary stenosis.冠状动脉狭窄的功能测量。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Mar 20;59(12):1045-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.077.
6
ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 Appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 冠状动脉血运重建适宜性标准更新重点:美国心脏病学会基金会适宜性标准专家组、心血管造影与介入学会、胸外科医师学会、美国胸外科学会、美国心脏协会、美国核医学学会和心血管计算机断层成像学会的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Feb 28;59(9):857-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.001. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
7
Contemporary and evolving risk scoring algorithms for percutaneous coronary intervention.当代及演进中的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗风险评分算法。
Heart. 2011 Dec;97(23):1902-13. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300718.
8
Comparison of long-term mortality risk following normal exercise vs adenosine myocardial perfusion SPECT.正常运动与腺苷心肌灌注 SPECT 后长期死亡率风险的比较。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2010 Dec;17(6):999-1008. doi: 10.1007/s12350-010-9300-9. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
9
Limitation of fractional flow reserve in evaluating coronary artery myocardial bridge.血流储备分数在评估冠状动脉心肌桥中的局限性。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 May;20(5):E161-6.
10
Coronary flow reserve in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: relation with microvascular dysfunction and pathophysiological characteristics.肥厚型心肌病患者的冠状动脉血流储备:与微血管功能障碍及病理生理特征的关系。
Neth Heart J. 2007;15(6):209-15. doi: 10.1007/BF03085982.