Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Rd, XuHui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Canon Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara, Japan.
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jul;31(7):5096-5105. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07508-y. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
To compare the diagnostic power of separately integrating on-site computed tomography (CT)-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and static CT stress myocardial perfusion (CTP) with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in detecting patients with flow-limiting CAD. The flow-limiting stenosis was defined as obstructive (≥ 50%) stenosis by invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with a corresponding perfusion deficit on stress single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/MPI).
Forty-eight patients (74 vessels) were enrolled who underwent research-indicated combined CTA-CTP (320-row CT scanner, temporal resolution 137 ms) and SPECT/MPI prior to conventional coronary angiography. CT-FFR was computed on-site using resting CCTA data with dedicated workstation-based software. All five imaging modalities were analyzed in blinded independent core laboratories. Logistic regression and the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) index were used to evaluate incremental differences in CT-FFR or CTP compared with CCTA alone.
The prevalence of obstructive CAD defined by combined ICA-SPECT/MPI was 40%. Per-vessel sensitivity and specificity were 95 and 42% for CCTA, 76 and 89% for CCTA + CTP, and 81 and 96% for CCTA + CT-FFR, respectively. The diagnostic performance of CCTA (AUC = 0.82) was improved by combining it with CT-FFR (AUC = 0.92, p = 0.01; IDI = 0.27, p < 0.001) or CTP (AUC = 0.90, p = 0.02; IDI = 0.18, p = 0.003).
On-site CT-FFR combined with CCTA provides an incremental diagnostic improvement over CCTA alone in identifying patients with flow-limiting CAD defined by ICA + SPECT/MPI, with a comparable diagnostic accuracy for integrated CTP and CCTA.
• Both on-site CT-FFR and CTP perform well with high diagnostic accuracy in the detection of flow-limiting stenosis. • Comparable diagnostic accuracy between CCTA + CT-FFR and CCTA + CTP is demonstrated to detect flow-limiting stenosis. • Integrated CT-FFR and CCTA derived from a single widened CCTA data acquisition can accurately and conveniently evaluate both coronary anatomy and physiology in the future management of patients with suspected CAD, without the need for additional vasodilator administration and contrast and radiation exposure.
比较分别整合基于现场计算机断层扫描(CT)的血流储备分数(CT-FFR)和静态 CT 应激心肌灌注(CTP)与冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(CCTA)在检测存在限制血流的 CAD 患者中的诊断能力。限制血流的狭窄定义为经侵入性冠状动脉造影(ICA)证实的阻塞性(≥50%)狭窄,并且在应激单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT/MPI)上存在相应的灌注缺损。
本研究纳入了 48 名患者(74 支血管),这些患者在常规冠状动脉造影之前接受了研究性联合 CTA-CTP(320 排 CT 扫描仪,时间分辨率为 137 ms)和 SPECT/MPI。使用专用工作站的软件在静息 CCTA 数据上计算 CT-FFR。所有五种成像方式均在盲法独立核心实验室进行分析。使用逻辑回归和整合判别改善(IDI)指数来评估 CT-FFR 或 CTP 与单独 CCTA 相比的增量差异。
联合 ICA-SPECT/MPI 定义的阻塞性 CAD 的患病率为 40%。每支血管的敏感性和特异性分别为 CCTA 的 95%和 42%,CCTA+CTP 的 76%和 89%,以及 CCTA+CT-FFR 的 81%和 96%。CCTA(AUC=0.82)的诊断性能通过结合 CT-FFR(AUC=0.92,p=0.01;IDI=0.27,p<0.001)或 CTP(AUC=0.90,p=0.02;IDI=0.18,p=0.003)得到改善。
现场 CT-FFR 与 CCTA 相结合,在确定通过 ICA+SPECT/MPI 定义的存在限制血流的 CAD 患者方面,提供了优于单独 CCTA 的增量诊断改善,与综合 CTP 和 CCTA 的诊断准确性相当。
· 现场 CT-FFR 和 CTP 在检测限制血流的狭窄方面表现良好,具有较高的诊断准确性。
· 证明 CCTA+CT-FFR 和 CCTA+CTP 的诊断准确性相当,可用于检测限制血流的狭窄。
· 从单次加宽 CCTA 数据采集综合 CT-FFR 和 CCTA 可以在未来疑似 CAD 患者的管理中准确、方便地评估冠状动脉解剖结构和功能,而无需额外的血管扩张剂给药以及辐射暴露。