Dwyer Dominic B, Harrison Ben J, Yücel Murat, Whittle Sarah, Zalesky Andrew, Pantelis Christos, Allen Nicholas B, Fornito Alex
Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia 3053,
Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia 3053.
J Neurosci. 2014 Oct 15;34(42):14096-107. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1634-14.2014.
Adolescence is a time when the ability to engage cognitive control is linked to crucial life outcomes. Despite a historical focus on prefrontal cortex functioning, recent evidence suggests that differences between individuals may relate to interactions between distributed brain regions that collectively form a cognitive control network (CCN). Other research points to a spatially distinct and functionally antagonistic system--the default-mode network (DMN)--which typically deactivates during performance of control tasks. This literature implies that individual differences in cognitive control are determined either by activation or functional connectivity of CCN regions, deactivation or functional connectivity of DMN regions, or some combination of both. We tested between these possibilities using a multilevel fMRI characterization of CCN and DMN dynamics, measured during performance of a cognitive control task and during a task-free resting state, in 73 human adolescents. Better cognitive control performance was associated with (1) reduced activation of CCN regions, but not deactivation of the DMN; (2) variations in task-related, but not resting-state, functional connectivity within a distributed network involving both the CCN and DMN; (3) functional segregation of core elements of these two systems; and (4) task-dependent functional integration of a set of peripheral nodes into either one network or the other in response to prevailing stimulus conditions. These results indicate that individual differences in adolescent cognitive control are not solely attributable to the functioning of any single region or network, but are instead dependent on a dynamic and context-dependent interplay between the CCN and DMN.
青春期是一个认知控制能力与关键生活结果相关联的时期。尽管历史上一直关注前额叶皮质的功能,但最近的证据表明,个体之间的差异可能与共同构成认知控制网络(CCN)的分布式脑区之间的相互作用有关。其他研究指出了一个空间上不同且功能上相互拮抗的系统——默认模式网络(DMN),它通常在控制任务执行期间失活。这些文献表明,认知控制的个体差异是由CCN区域的激活或功能连接、DMN区域的失活或功能连接,或两者的某种组合决定的。我们在73名青少年中进行了一项多级功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究,对CCN和DMN动态进行了表征,测量了在认知控制任务执行期间和无任务静息状态下的情况,以检验这些可能性。更好的认知控制表现与以下因素相关:(1)CCN区域激活减少,但DMN未失活;(2)涉及CCN和DMN的分布式网络内与任务相关而非静息状态的功能连接变化;(3)这两个系统核心元素的功能分离;(4)一组外周节点根据主要刺激条件在任务依赖下功能整合到其中一个网络或另一个网络中。这些结果表明,青少年认知控制的个体差异并非仅归因于任何单个区域或网络的功能,而是取决于CCN和DMN之间动态的、依赖于上下文的相互作用。