Kessler S
Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco.
Am J Med Genet. 1989 Nov;34(3):340-53. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320340310.
The post-1979 literature dealing with the educational and reproductive outcome and process of genetic counseling is reviewed. Despite methodological difficulties, recent publications strongly suggest that genetic counseling is successful in educating counselees about diagnostic and risk information. In general, investigators suggest that there is room for improvement and the factors leading to imperfect recall of information need to be elucidated. Process studies suggest that the educational priorities of counselors and counselees may not always be consistent. The contribution of these inconsistencies to outcome measures needs further study. Also, it appears that differing counseling approaches may be equally effective in achieving educational goals. Studies on the reproductive outcome of genetic counseling show no strong impact of counseling; there appears to be a net increase of desire for more children following counseling. Precounseling reproductive intentions, rather than counseling, were found to be a major factor in determining postcounseling outcome. Process studies suggest that although many counselees say that they were influenced by genetic counseling, it is uncertain what they mean, since for many counselees, reproductive decisions seem to have been made prior to counseling.
本文回顾了1979年以后有关遗传咨询的教育及生殖结果与过程的文献。尽管存在方法学上的困难,但近期的出版物有力地表明,遗传咨询在向咨询对象传授诊断和风险信息方面是成功的。总体而言,研究者认为仍有改进空间,需要阐明导致信息回忆不完整的因素。过程研究表明,咨询师和咨询对象的教育重点可能并不总是一致的。这些不一致对结果指标的影响需要进一步研究。此外,不同的咨询方法在实现教育目标方面似乎同样有效。关于遗传咨询生殖结果的研究表明,咨询没有产生强烈影响;咨询后想要更多孩子的意愿似乎有净增加。咨询前的生殖意愿,而非咨询本身,被发现是决定咨询后结果的主要因素。过程研究表明,尽管许多咨询对象表示他们受到了遗传咨询的影响,但他们的意思并不明确,因为对许多咨询对象来说,生殖决定似乎在咨询之前就已做出。