• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[反流与食管裂孔疝:保守治疗与手术治疗之争]

[Reflux and hiatus hernia in the controversy between conservative and operative therapy].

作者信息

Freys S M, Heimbucher J

机构信息

Chirurgische Klinik, Interdisziplinäres Bauchzentrum, Darmkrebszentrum Bremen West, DIAKO Ev. Diakonie-Krankenhaus gGmbH, Gröpelinger Heerstr. 406-408, 28239, Bremen, Deutschland,

出版信息

Chirurg. 2014 Dec;85(12):1046-54. doi: 10.1007/s00104-014-2804-0.

DOI:10.1007/s00104-014-2804-0
PMID:25323490
Abstract

Approximately 20 % of the population are affected by gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The subjective clinical and objective pathological extent of the disease is highly variable and the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms extraordinarily diverse. The importance of hiatus hernia for GERD has been intensively debated for decades. Hiatus hernia was initially considered to be at the center of the pathophysiology but later the function of the lower esophageal sphincter was increasingly considered to be of importance. Currently, additional relevant pathophysiological cofactors are being detected with the continuous improvement in diagnostic methods and used for therapeutic decision-making. Despite standardization of the operative technique and increasing criticism on long-term proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, antireflux surgery still requires a very critical assessment of indications based on a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation.

摘要

大约20%的人口受到胃食管反流病(GERD)的影响。该疾病的主观临床和客观病理程度差异很大,其潜在的病理生理机制也极为多样。几十年来,食管裂孔疝对GERD的重要性一直存在激烈争论。食管裂孔疝最初被认为是病理生理学的核心,但后来食管下括约肌的功能越来越被认为很重要。目前,随着诊断方法的不断改进,正在检测到其他相关的病理生理辅助因素,并将其用于治疗决策。尽管手术技术已经标准化,且对长期质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗的批评越来越多,但抗反流手术仍需要基于全面诊断评估对适应证进行非常严格的评估。

相似文献

1
[Reflux and hiatus hernia in the controversy between conservative and operative therapy].[反流与食管裂孔疝:保守治疗与手术治疗之争]
Chirurg. 2014 Dec;85(12):1046-54. doi: 10.1007/s00104-014-2804-0.
2
Rethinking gastroesophageal reflux disorder.重新思考胃食管反流病。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2020 Dec;1482(1):177-192. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14478. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
3
[Gastroesophageal reflux after laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair in patients with axial hiatal hernia].[轴型食管裂孔疝患者腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术后的胃食管反流]
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2020(6):38-43. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202006138.
4
Sliding Hiatus Hernia: A Two-Step Pressure Pump of Gastroesophageal Reflux.滑动性食管裂孔疝:胃食管反流的两步压力泵。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Jul;161(1):339-341.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.03.013. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
5
Clinical and surgical relevance of the progressive phases of intrathoracic migration of the gastroesophageal junction in gastroesophageal reflux disease.胃食管反流病中胃食管交界处胸腔内迁移进展阶段的临床及外科相关性
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998 Aug;116(2):267-75. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(98)70126-6.
6
Hiatal hernia recurrence following magnetic sphincter augmentation and posterior cruroplasty: intermediate-term outcomes.磁括约肌增强和后穹窿成形术后食管裂孔疝复发:中期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3374-3379. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6059-6. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
7
Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease: new understanding in a new era.胃食管反流病的病理生理学:新时代的新认识
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Sep;27(9):1202-13. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12611. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
8
Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease: how an antireflux procedure works (or does not work).胃食管反流病的病理生理学:抗反流手术的作用机制(或无效机制)
Updates Surg. 2018 Sep;70(3):343-347. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0562-0. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
9
Swallow-induced esophageal shortening in patients without hiatal hernia is associated with gastroesophageal reflux.无食管裂孔疝患者吞咽引起的食管缩短与胃食管反流有关。
Dis Esophagus. 2018 May 1;31(5). doi: 10.1093/dote/dox152.
10
Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Fundoplication and Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for the Treatment of Medically Refractory GERD.腹腔镜胃底折叠术与磁括约肌增强术治疗药物难治性胃食管反流病的对比分析
Am Surg. 2018 Nov 1;84(11):1762-1767.

本文引用的文献

1
EAES recommendations for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.欧洲内镜外科学会关于胃食管反流病管理的建议
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jun;28(6):1753-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3431-z. Epub 2014 May 2.
2
Addition of prokinetics to PPI therapy in gastroesophageal reflux disease: a meta-analysis.在胃食管反流病的质子泵抑制剂治疗中添加促动力药:一项荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar 7;20(9):2412-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i9.2412.
3
New and future drug development for gastroesophageal reflux disease.胃食管反流病的新型及未来药物研发
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Jan;20(1):6-16. doi: 10.5056/jnm.2014.20.1.6. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
4
[Antireflux operations: indications and techniques].[抗反流手术:适应证与技术]
Chirurg. 2013 Apr;84(4):339-50. doi: 10.1007/s00104-012-2385-8.
5
Alginate controls heartburn in patients with erosive and nonerosive reflux disease.藻酸盐可控制糜烂性和非糜烂性反流病患者的胃灼热。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 28;18(32):4371-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4371.
6
Concomitant symptoms itemized in the Reflux Disease Questionnaire are associated with attenuated heartburn response to acid suppression.反流疾病问卷中列举的伴随症状与酸抑制后烧心反应减弱有关。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep;107(9):1354-60. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.197. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
7
[Reccurent reflux … and other problems following fundoplication: indication for re-operation].[复发性反流……以及胃底折叠术后的其他问题:再次手术的指征]
Zentralbl Chir. 2014 Feb;139(1):43-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1283982. Epub 2012 May 21.
8
The LINX® reflux management system: confirmed safety and efficacy now at 4 years.LINX® 反流管理系统:4 年的安全性和疗效得到证实。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct;26(10):2944-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2289-1. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
9
Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: beyond proton pump inhibitor therapy.胃食管反流病:质子泵抑制剂治疗之外。
Drugs. 2011 Dec 24;71(18):2381-9. doi: 10.2165/11597300-000000000-00000.
10
[Newly recognized side-effects of proton pump inhibitors. Arguments in favour of fundoplication for GERD?].[质子泵抑制剂新发现的副作用。支持胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病的论据?]
Chirurg. 2012 Jan;83(1):38-44. doi: 10.1007/s00104-011-2173-x.