• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探究本科阶段关于谵妄的教学未能确保达到金标准实践的原因——英国全国性调查结果

Towards an understanding of why undergraduate teaching about delirium does not guarantee gold-standard practice--results from a UK national survey.

作者信息

Fisher James Michael, Gordon Adam Lee, MacLullich Alasdair M J, Tullo Ellen, Davis Daniel H J, Blundell Adrian, Field Robert H, Teodorczuk Andrew

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Wansbeck General Hospital, Woodhorn Lane, Ashington, Northumberland, UK.

Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, University of Nottingham, Medical School, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Age Ageing. 2015 Jan;44(1):166-70. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu154. Epub 2014 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1093/ageing/afu154
PMID:25324329
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4601531/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

delirium is common and serious, yet frequently missed by medical staff. It is known that delirium is widely taught and examined in UK medical schools; however, what is taught, and how such teaching is delivered, remains unknown. The primary aim of this study was to determine the content of UK undergraduate medical education about delirium and establish how it is delivered. A secondary aim was to highlight and share examples of gold-standard teaching on delirium.

METHODS

all UK undergraduate medical schools were invited to complete a survey. Schools were asked to describe how delirium was taught and to provide delirium-related learning outcomes. Learning outcomes were mapped to the three overarching themes outlined in Tomorrow's Doctors (knowledge, skills and attitudes).

RESULTS

24/31 schools (77%) provided responses. In line with previous work, delirium was widely taught and examined. 18/24 schools reported at least one learning outcome that mapped to the knowledge domain, 19/24 for the skills domain and 2/24 for the attitudes domain. 4/24 evaluated the impact of sessions and 3/24 involved patients and the public in teaching. 13/24 schools were confident that exposure to delirium was guaranteed. Innovative teaching methods were reported by a number of schools; weblinks to examples are provided.

DISCUSSION

there was widespread failure to address attitudes on delirium within teaching, to evaluate the impact of sessions, to involve patients and the public in teaching and to guarantee exposure to delirium. Future teaching interventions should be directed at attitudinal outcomes, using a synthesis of clinical experience with multidisciplinary interaction and supportive technologies.

摘要

背景

谵妄很常见且严重,但医护人员常常漏诊。众所周知,英国医学院校广泛教授并考查谵妄相关内容;然而,具体教授了哪些内容以及如何授课仍不为人知。本研究的主要目的是确定英国本科医学教育中关于谵妄的内容,并确定其授课方式。次要目的是突出并分享谵妄金标准教学的实例。

方法

邀请了英国所有本科医学院校完成一项调查。要求各院校描述谵妄的授课方式,并提供与谵妄相关的学习成果。学习成果被映射到《明日医生》中概述的三个总体主题(知识、技能和态度)。

结果

31所院校中有24所(77%)做出了回应。与之前的研究一致,谵妄被广泛教授和考查。24所院校中有18所报告了至少一项映射到知识领域的学习成果,19所映射到技能领域,2所映射到态度领域。24所院校中有4所评估了课程的影响,24所中有3所让患者和公众参与教学。24所院校中有13所确信学生能接触到谵妄相关内容。一些院校报告了创新的教学方法;提供了相关示例的网络链接。

讨论

在教学中普遍未能涉及对谵妄的态度、评估课程的影响、让患者和公众参与教学以及确保学生接触到谵妄相关内容。未来的教学干预应针对态度方面的成果,综合运用临床经验、多学科互动和支持技术。

相似文献

1
Towards an understanding of why undergraduate teaching about delirium does not guarantee gold-standard practice--results from a UK national survey.探究本科阶段关于谵妄的教学未能确保达到金标准实践的原因——英国全国性调查结果
Age Ageing. 2015 Jan;44(1):166-70. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu154. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
2
Teaching safe and effective prescribing in UK medical schools: a core curriculum for tomorrow's doctors.英国医学院校安全有效处方教学:面向未来医生的核心课程。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Jun;55(6):496-503. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01878.x.
3
Development of an international undergraduate curriculum for delirium using a modified delphi process.运用改良德尔菲法制定国际本科谵妄课程。
Age Ageing. 2018 Jan 1;47(1):131-137. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx133.
4
UK medical teaching about ageing is improving but there is still work to be done: the Second National Survey of Undergraduate Teaching in Ageing and Geriatric Medicine.英国的医学老龄化教学正在改善,但仍有工作要做:第二次老龄化和老年医学本科教学全国调查。
Age Ageing. 2014 Mar;43(2):293-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft207. Epub 2013 Dec 29.
5
Physical activity education in the undergraduate curricula of all UK medical schools: are tomorrow's doctors equipped to follow clinical guidelines?英国所有医学院本科课程中的体育活动教育:未来的医生是否具备遵循临床指南的能力?
Br J Sports Med. 2012 Nov;46(14):1024-6. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091380. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
6
Medical undergraduate primary care teaching across the UK: what is being taught?英国医学本科初级保健教学:都在教些什么?
Educ Prim Care. 2017 Jan;28(1):23-28. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2016.1222887. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
7
Teaching and learning about dementia in UK medical schools: a national survey.英国医学院中关于痴呆症的教学与学习:全国性调查。
BMC Geriatr. 2013 Mar 27;13:29. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-13-29.
8
Current teaching of paediatric musculoskeletal medicine within UK medical schools--a need for change.英国医学院校目前的儿童肌肉骨骼医学教学——变革的必要性。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 May;48(5):587-90. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep038. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
9
Teaching of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics in UK medical schools: current status in 2009.英国医学院临床药理学与治疗学教学:2009 年现状。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Jul;70(1):143-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03665.x.
10
Present and future of the undergraduate ophthalmology curriculum: a survey of UK medical schools.本科眼科学课程的现状与未来:英国医学院校调查
Int J Med Educ. 2017 Nov 2;8:389-395. doi: 10.5116/ijme.59ac.f69b.

引用本文的文献

1
What are we teaching UK medical students about ageing and geriatric medicine? Results of the third British Geriatrics Society national curriculum and teaching survey.我们在向英国医学生教授关于衰老和老年医学的哪些内容?英国老年医学学会第三次全国课程与教学调查结果。
Age Ageing. 2025 Aug 1;54(8). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf216.
2
A theory of change approach to curricular revision: filling a curricular gap identified through curriculum mapping.一种课程修订的变革理论方法:填补通过课程映射识别出的课程空白。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 15;25(1):533. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07100-2.
3
'The upside-down' healthcare professional students' experiences of delirium: an all-Ireland focus group study.“颠倒”的医护专业学生对谵妄的体验:一项全爱尔兰焦点小组研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1470. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06503-x.
4
Co-designing an interprofessional digital education resource on delirium: a student-led approach.合作设计一个关于谵妄的跨专业数字教育资源:以学生为导向的方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 10;24(1):1122. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06023-8.
5
Co-design and mixed methods evaluation of an interdisciplinary digital resource for undergraduate health profession students to improve the prevention, recognition, and management of delirium in Ireland: a study protocol.跨学科数字资源的共同设计和混合方法评估,以提高爱尔兰本科卫生专业学生对谵妄的预防、识别和管理:一项研究方案。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 30;24(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05468-1.
6
Developing a list of core competencies for medical aspects of healthcare delivery in care homes: scoping review and Delphi process.制定养老院医疗服务中医疗方面的核心能力清单:范围综述和德尔菲法研究。
Age Ageing. 2023 Dec 1;52(12). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad237.
7
What is meant by "frailty" in undergraduate medical education? A national survey of UK medical schools.本科医学教育中的“虚弱”是什么意思?英国医学院校的全国性调查。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2021 Apr;12(2):355-362. doi: 10.1007/s41999-021-00465-9. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
8
Evaluation of a delirium awareness podcast for undergraduate nursing students in Northern Ireland: a pre-/post-test study.北爱尔兰本科护理专业学生谵妄认知播客的评估:一项前后测研究。
BMC Nurs. 2021 Jan 13;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00543-0.
9
The influence of a serious game's narrative on students' attitudes and learning experiences regarding delirium: an interview study.一款严肃游戏的叙事对学生关于谵妄的态度和学习体验的影响:一项访谈研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Sep 1;20(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02210-5.
10
Reasons to Engage in and Learning Experiences From Different Play Strategies in a Web-Based Serious Game on Delirium for Medical Students: Mixed Methods Design.医学生在基于网络的谵妄严肃游戏中采用不同游戏策略的参与原因及学习体验:混合方法设计
JMIR Serious Games. 2020 Jul 29;8(3):e18479. doi: 10.2196/18479.

本文引用的文献

1
Interprofessional education for delirium care: a systematic review.谵妄护理的跨专业教育:一项系统综述
J Interprof Care. 2014 Jul;28(4):345-51. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2014.891979. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
2
UK medical teaching about ageing is improving but there is still work to be done: the Second National Survey of Undergraduate Teaching in Ageing and Geriatric Medicine.英国的医学老龄化教学正在改善,但仍有工作要做:第二次老龄化和老年医学本科教学全国调查。
Age Ageing. 2014 Mar;43(2):293-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft207. Epub 2013 Dec 29.
3
A new age approach to an age old problem: using simulation to teach geriatric medicine to medical students.一种解决古老问题的新时代方法:利用模拟向医学生教授老年医学。
Age Ageing. 2014 May;43(3):424-8. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft200. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
4
Educational interventions to improve recognition of delirium: a systematic review.教育干预措施以提高对谵妄的识别:系统评价。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Nov;61(11):1983-93. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12522. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
5
Undergraduate teaching in geriatric medicine using computer-aided learning improves student performance in examinations.使用计算机辅助学习进行老年医学本科教学可提高学生考试成绩。
Age Ageing. 2013 Jul;42(4):541-4. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft061. Epub 2013 May 31.
6
Teaching and learning about dementia in UK medical schools: a national survey.英国医学院中关于痴呆症的教学与学习:全国性调查。
BMC Geriatr. 2013 Mar 27;13:29. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-13-29.
7
Reconceptualizing models of delirium education: findings of a Grounded Theory study.重新构建谵妄教育模式:扎根理论研究的发现。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Apr;25(4):645-55. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212002074. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
8
Delirium is a strong risk factor for dementia in the oldest-old: a population-based cohort study.谵妄是高龄老人痴呆的一个强烈危险因素:基于人群的队列研究。
Brain. 2012 Sep;135(Pt 9):2809-16. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws190. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
9
Cost-effectiveness of multi-component interventions to prevent delirium in older people admitted to medical wards.多组分干预措施预防老年医学病房患者谵妄的成本效益。
Age Ageing. 2012 May;41(3):285-91. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr147. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
10
Delirium, nursing practice and the future.谵妄、护理实践与未来。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2006 Jun;1(2):121-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2006.00018.x.