• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

眼动研究揭示了句子构建过程中对焦点参照对象计划的语言影响:跨语言研究

What the eyes say about planning of focused referents during sentence formulation: a cross-linguistic investigation.

机构信息

Leiden University Centre for Linguistics Leiden, Netherlands ; Education and Child Studies, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands ; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition Leiden, Netherlands.

Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Nijmegen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 2;5:1124. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01124. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01124
PMID:25324820
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4183096/
Abstract

This study investigated how sentence formulation is influenced by a preceding discourse context. In two eye-tracking experiments, participants described pictures of two-character transitive events in Dutch (Experiment 1) and Chinese (Experiment 2). Focus was manipulated by presenting questions before each picture. In the Neutral condition, participants first heard "What is happening here?" In the Object or Subject Focus conditions, the questions asked about the Object or Subject character (What is the policeman stopping? Who is stopping the truck?). The target response was the same in all conditions (The policeman is stopping the truck). In both experiments, sentence formulation in the Neutral condition showed the expected pattern of speakers fixating the subject character (policeman) before the object character (truck). In contrast, in the focus conditions speakers rapidly directed their gaze preferentially only to the character they needed to encode to answer the question (the new, or focused, character). The timing of gaze shifts to the new character varied by language group (Dutch vs. Chinese): shifts to the new character occurred earlier when information in the question can be repeated in the response with the same syntactic structure (in Chinese but not in Dutch). The results show that discourse affects the timecourse of linguistic formulation in simple sentences and that these effects can be modulated by language-specific linguistic structures such as parallels in the syntax of questions and declarative sentences.

摘要

本研究调查了句子的构成如何受到前文话语语境的影响。在两项眼动实验中,参与者用荷兰语(实验 1)和汉语(实验 2)描述了两个字符及物事件的图片。通过在每张图片前呈现问题来操纵焦点。在中性条件下,参与者首先听到“这里发生了什么?”在对象或主语焦点条件下,问题询问的是对象或主语角色(警察在阻止谁?谁在阻止卡车?)。在所有条件下,目标反应都是相同的(警察正在阻止卡车)。在两项实验中,中性条件下的句子构成呈现出预期的模式,即说话者在注视对象角色(卡车)之前先注视主语角色(警察)。相比之下,在焦点条件下,说话者会迅速优先注视他们需要编码以回答问题的角色(新的或焦点角色)。注视新角色的时间变化因语言群体而异(荷兰语与汉语):当问题中的信息可以用相同的句法结构在回答中重复时(汉语中,但在荷兰语中则不然),注视新角色的时间变化更早。研究结果表明,话语会影响简单句中语言构成的时间进程,并且这些影响可以通过语言特定的语言结构来调节,例如疑问句和陈述句在句法上的相似性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d265/4183096/b4b43c65a7af/fpsyg-05-01124-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d265/4183096/6587237cf8b7/fpsyg-05-01124-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d265/4183096/0b56cc628d05/fpsyg-05-01124-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d265/4183096/5bbd1d2bcdad/fpsyg-05-01124-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d265/4183096/b4b43c65a7af/fpsyg-05-01124-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d265/4183096/6587237cf8b7/fpsyg-05-01124-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d265/4183096/0b56cc628d05/fpsyg-05-01124-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d265/4183096/5bbd1d2bcdad/fpsyg-05-01124-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d265/4183096/b4b43c65a7af/fpsyg-05-01124-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
What the eyes say about planning of focused referents during sentence formulation: a cross-linguistic investigation.眼动研究揭示了句子构建过程中对焦点参照对象计划的语言影响:跨语言研究
Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 2;5:1124. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01124. eCollection 2014.
2
Incrementality in Planning of Speech During Speaking and Reading Aloud: Evidence from Eye-Tracking.朗读与默读时言语规划的增量性:来自眼动追踪的证据
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 26;7:33. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00033. eCollection 2016.
3
Accessibility of Referent Information Influences Sentence Planning: An Eye-Tracking Study.参照信息的可获取性影响句子规划:一项眼动追踪研究。
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 28;8:250. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00250. eCollection 2017.
4
Encoding actions and verbs: Tracking the time-course of relational encoding during message and sentence formulation.编码动作和动词:在信息和句子构建过程中跟踪关系编码的时间进程。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Aug;45(8):1486-1510. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000650. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
5
Planning to speak in L1 and L2.计划用母语和第二语言发言。
Cogn Psychol. 2018 May;102:72-104. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.12.003. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
6
Priming sentence planning.启动句子规划。
Cogn Psychol. 2014 Sep;73:1-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 May 14.
7
Can Speaker Gaze Modulate Syntactic Structuring and Thematic Role Assignment during Spoken Sentence Comprehension?说话人注视能否调节口语句子理解过程中的句法结构和主题角色分配?
Front Psychol. 2012 Dec 5;3:538. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00538. eCollection 2012.
8
Word Order and Voice Influence the Timing of Verb Planning in German Sentence Production.词序和语态影响德语句子生成中动词规划的时机。
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 26;8:1648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01648. eCollection 2017.
9
Production Before Comprehension in the Emergence of Transitive Constructions in Dutch Child Language.荷兰儿童语言中及物结构出现过程中的理解前产出
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 26;11:546495. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.546495. eCollection 2020.
10
Verbal Semantics Drives Early Anticipatory Eye Movements during the Comprehension of Verb-Initial Sentences.言语语义在动词居首句子理解过程中驱动早期预期眼动。
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 9;7:95. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00095. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Linear incrementality in focus and accentuation processing during sentence production: evidence from eye movements.句子生成过程中焦点和重音处理的线性增量:来自眼动的证据。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Jan 7;18:1523629. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1523629. eCollection 2024.
2
The Interplay of Relational and Non-relational Processes in Sentence Production: The Case of Relative Clause Planning in Japanese and Spanish.句子生成中关系性与非关系性过程的相互作用:以日语和西班牙语中的关系从句规划为例
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 11;9:1573. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01573. eCollection 2018.
3
Accessibility of Referent Information Influences Sentence Planning: An Eye-Tracking Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Priming sentence planning.启动句子规划。
Cogn Psychol. 2014 Sep;73:1-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 May 14.
2
On the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation.关于事件理解与话语表述之间的相互作用。
J Mem Lang. 2007 Nov;57(4):544-569. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.01.007.
3
The eyes are right when the mouth is wrong.言不由衷时,眼神便会出卖你。
参照信息的可获取性影响句子规划:一项眼动追踪研究。
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 28;8:250. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00250. eCollection 2017.
Psychol Sci. 2004 Dec;15(12):814-21. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00761.x.
4
What the eyes say about speaking.眼睛在说话方面所传达的信息。
Psychol Sci. 2000 Jul;11(4):274-9. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00255.
5
Syntactic priming in language production.语言生成中的句法启动效应
Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Apr;3(4):136-141. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01293-0.