Suppr超能文献

评估利奈唑胺与达托霉素治疗耐万古霉素肠球菌所致菌血症的成年肿瘤患者的疗效。

Assessing outcomes of adult oncology patients treated with linezolid versus daptomycin for bacteremia due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus.

作者信息

Patel Khilna, Kabir Rubiya, Ahmad Samrah, Allen Steven L

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, USA

Department of Pharmacy, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, USA.

出版信息

J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2016 Apr;22(2):212-8. doi: 10.1177/1078155214556523. Epub 2014 Oct 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence and severity of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus blood stream infections continue to rise and is a significant burden in the healthcare setting. Literature thus far is minimal regarding treatment outcomes in patients with malignancy and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus bacteremia. Appropriate antibiotic selection is vital to treatment success due to high rates of resistance, limited antimicrobials and mortality in this patient population. We conducted this study to determine whether treatment outcomes differed between cancer patients treated with linezolid and those treated with daptomycin for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus bacteremia.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study included adult patients hospitalized on the oncology service with documented vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium or Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia who received at least 48 h of either linezolid or daptomycin as primary treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients were included in the analysis. Thirty-two patients received daptomycin as primary treatment, and 33 patients received linezolid as primary treatment. Twenty-six (76.5%) patients in the linezolid cohort versus 22 (71%) patients in the daptomycin cohort achieved microbiological cure (p = 0.6141). Median length of stay in days (30 vs. 42, p = 0.0714) and mortality (7/32 (20.6%) vs. 8/33 (25.8%), p = 0.6180) were also similar between the linezolid and daptomycin treated patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

No differences in microbiological cure, length of stay or mortality were identified between the groups. This study suggests that linezolid and daptomycin are each reasonable options for treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus bacteremia in oncology patients. Further prospective, randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the optimal treatment for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus bacteremia in this patient population.

摘要

背景

耐万古霉素肠球菌血流感染的发病率和严重程度持续上升,在医疗环境中是一个重大负担。迄今为止,关于恶性肿瘤患者合并耐万古霉素肠球菌菌血症的治疗结果的文献极少。由于该患者群体耐药率高、抗菌药物有限且死亡率高,因此选择合适的抗生素对于治疗成功至关重要。我们进行这项研究以确定接受利奈唑胺治疗的癌症患者与接受达托霉素治疗的耐万古霉素肠球菌菌血症患者的治疗结果是否存在差异。

方法

这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了在肿瘤科室住院的成年患者,这些患者记录有耐万古霉素屎肠球菌或粪肠球菌菌血症,且接受了至少48小时的利奈唑胺或达托霉素作为主要治疗。

结果

共有65例患者纳入分析。32例患者接受达托霉素作为主要治疗,33例患者接受利奈唑胺作为主要治疗。利奈唑胺组26例(76.5%)患者与达托霉素组22例(71%)患者实现了微生物学治愈(p = 0.6141)。利奈唑胺治疗组和达托霉素治疗组患者的中位住院天数(分别为30天和42天,p = 0.0714)和死亡率(分别为7/32(20.6%)和8/33(25.8%),p = 0.6180)也相似。

结论

两组之间在微生物学治愈、住院时间或死亡率方面未发现差异。本研究表明,利奈唑胺和达托霉素均是治疗肿瘤患者耐万古霉素肠球菌菌血症的合理选择。需要进一步进行前瞻性随机对照试验,以评估该患者群体中耐万古霉素肠球菌菌血症的最佳治疗方法

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验