Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Nov;7(11):1266-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.04.026. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
The present study established criteria to differentiate simple from complex bifurcation lesions and compared 1-year outcomes stratified by lesion complexity after provisional stenting (PS) and 2-stent techniques using drug-eluting stents.
Currently, no criterion can distinguish between simple and complex coronary bifurcation lesions. Comparisons of PS and 2-stent strategies stratified by lesion complexity have also not been reported previously.
Criteria of bifurcation complexity in 1,500 patients were externally tested in another 3,660 true bifurcation lesions after placement of drug-eluting stents. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) at 12 months. The secondary endpoint was the rate of stent thrombosis (ST).
Complex (n = 1,108) bifurcation lesions were associated with a higher 1-year rate of MACE (16.8%) compared with simple (n = 2,552) bifurcation lesions (8.9%) (p < 0.001). The in-hospital ST and 1-year target lesion revascularization rates after 2-stent techniques in the simple group (1.0% and 5.6%, respectively) were significantly different from those after PS (0.2% [p = 0.007] and 3.2% [p = 0.009], respectively); however, 1-year MACE rates were not significantly different between the 2 groups. For complex bifurcation lesions, 2-stent techniques had lower rates of 1-year cardiac death (2.8%) and in-hospital MACE (5.0%) compared with PS (5.3%, p = 0.047; 8.4%, p = 0.031).
Complex bifurcation lesions had higher rates of 1-year MACE and ST. The 2-stent and PS techniques were overall equivalent in 1-year MACE. However, 2-stent techniques for complex lesions elicited a lower rate of cardiac death and in-hospital MACE but higher rates of in-hospital ST and revascularization at 1 year for simple lesions.
本研究旨在建立区分简单和复杂分叉病变的标准,并比较使用药物洗脱支架进行临时支架置入(PS)和双支架技术后根据病变复杂性分层的 1 年结果。
目前尚无标准可以区分简单和复杂的冠状动脉分叉病变。以前也没有报告过根据病变复杂性对 PS 和双支架策略进行分层的比较。
在放置药物洗脱支架后,对另外 3660 例真实分叉病变中的 1500 例患者的分叉复杂性标准进行了外部验证。主要终点是 12 个月时发生的主要不良心脏事件(MACE)。次要终点是支架血栓形成(ST)的发生率。
与简单分叉病变(n=2552)相比,复杂分叉病变(n=1108)的 1 年 MACE 发生率(16.8%)更高(p<0.001)。简单组的双支架技术住院 ST 和 1 年靶病变血运重建率(分别为 1.0%和 5.6%)与 PS (分别为 0.2%[p=0.007]和 3.2%[p=0.009])显著不同;然而,两组的 1 年 MACE 发生率无显著差异。对于复杂的分叉病变,双支架技术的 1 年心脏死亡率(2.8%)和住院期间 MACE(5.0%)低于 PS(5.3%,p=0.047;8.4%,p=0.031)。
复杂的分叉病变的 1 年 MACE 和 ST 发生率更高。双支架和 PS 技术在 1 年 MACE 方面总体上等效。然而,对于复杂病变,双支架技术的心脏死亡率和住院期间 MACE 发生率较低,但对于简单病变,1 年时的住院 ST 和血运重建率较高。