• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多标准决策方法在健康保险承保中的应用。

Multi-criteria decision-making methods applied in health-insurance underwriting.

作者信息

Mourmouris John, Poufinas Thomas

机构信息

Economics, Democritus University of Thrace, University Campus, Komotini, Greece.

出版信息

Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2022 Jun 19;12(1):52-84. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2022.2085190. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1080/20476965.2022.2085190
PMID:36926373
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10013473/
Abstract

This study attempts to structure methodologically the health insurance underwriting process by applying . This is done by assigning a score to each health insurance applicant which can be used to determine whether he or she is accepted, rejected or accepted with special terms and conditions (such as exclusions, additional waiting periods and/ or surcharge). The introduction of MCDM approaches in health insurance underwriting enables the quantification of the selection criteria, the increased standardization and automation of the process and its alignment through quantitative indicators with the risk tolerance/ risk appetite of the insurer, and there lie the novelties of this research. The proposed methodology can be readily implemented by insurers with added value in the underwriting, risk management and distribution (sales & marketing) functions, as well as in the profitability of the company or the level of premium paid by the insured.

摘要

本研究试图通过应用……从方法学角度构建健康保险承保流程。具体做法是为每位健康保险申请人赋予一个分数,该分数可用于确定其是否被接受、拒绝或被有特殊条款和条件(如除外责任、额外等待期和/或附加费)地接受。在健康保险承保中引入多准则决策方法能够使选择标准量化、流程的标准化和自动化程度提高,并通过定量指标使其与保险公司的风险承受能力/风险偏好保持一致,而这正是本研究的新颖之处。所提出的方法可由保险公司在承保、风险管理和分销(销售与营销)职能以及公司盈利能力或被保险人支付的保费水平方面具有附加值的情况下轻松实施。

相似文献

1
Multi-criteria decision-making methods applied in health-insurance underwriting.多标准决策方法在健康保险承保中的应用。
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2022 Jun 19;12(1):52-84. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2022.2085190. eCollection 2023.
2
Supplementary insurance as a switching cost for basic health insurance: Empirical results from the Netherlands.补充保险作为基本医疗保险的转换成本:来自荷兰的实证结果。
Health Policy. 2017 Oct;121(10):1085-1092. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
3
Time Dependent Relative Risks in Life Insurance Medical Underwriting.人寿保险医学核保中的时间依赖性相对风险。
J Insur Med. 2015;45(2):88-97. doi: 10.17849/insm-45-02-088-097.1.
4
Medical Underwriting In Long-Term Care Insurance: Market Conditions Limit Options For Higher-Risk Consumers.长期护理保险中的医疗核保:市场状况限制了高风险消费者的选择。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Aug 1;35(8):1494-503. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1133.
5
Age dependent decline of relative risks in life insurance medical underwriting.人寿保险医学核保中相对风险的年龄依赖性下降。
J Insur Med. 2014;44(3):170-83.
6
Long-term care insurance underwriting: understanding eventual claims experience.长期护理保险承保:了解最终理赔经验。
Inquiry. 2000;37(4):348-58.
7
The Added Value of Medical Testing in Underwriting Life Insurance.人寿保险核保中医学检测的附加价值。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0145891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145891. eCollection 2015.
8
Insurability and the HIV epidemic: ethical issues in underwriting.可保性与艾滋病流行:保险核保中的伦理问题
Milbank Q. 1990;68(4):497-525.
9
Disability insurance: can underwriting criteria for the self-employed be based on predictors used for disability amongst employees?伤残保险:个体经营者的承保标准能否基于适用于雇员伤残情况的预测指标?
J Insur Med. 2006;38(4):259-70.
10
Risky business: long-term care insurance underwriting.风险业务:长期护理保险承保
Inquiry. 1995 Fall;32(3):271-84.

本文引用的文献

1
Recommendations to improve insurance coverage for physiotherapy services in Iran: a multi criteria decision-making approach.改善伊朗物理治疗服务保险覆盖范围的建议:一种多标准决策方法。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Dec 11;19(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00333-0.
2
Multi-criteria decision analysis approach for strategy scale-up with application to Chagas disease management in Bolivia.多准则决策分析方法在战略扩展中的应用——以玻利维亚恰加斯病管理为例。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Mar 26;15(3):e0009249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009249. eCollection 2021 Mar.
3
A New Decision Model Approach for Health Technology Assessment and A Case Study for Dialysis Alternatives in Turkey.一种新的决策模型方法在卫生技术评估中的应用及土耳其透析方案选择的实例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 21;17(10):3608. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103608.
4
The 6 Functions of Health Insurance.健康保险的六项功能。
JAMA. 2019 Apr 2;321(13):1242-1243. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.2320.
5
MCDA from a health economics perspective: opportunities and pitfalls of extending economic evaluation to incorporate broader outcomes.从卫生经济学角度看多标准决策分析:将经济评估扩展以纳入更广泛结果的机遇与陷阱
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018 Nov 9;16(Suppl 1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12962-018-0118-7. eCollection 2018.
6
Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in health care: a systematic review of the main characteristics and methodological steps.多准则决策分析(MCDA)在医疗保健中的应用:主要特征和方法步骤的系统评价。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Nov 1;18(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0663-1.
7
Non-monetary valuation using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Sensitivity of additive aggregation methods to scaling and compensation assumptions.使用多标准决策分析的非货币估值:加法聚合方法对缩放和补偿假设的敏感性。
Ecosyst Serv. 2018 Feb 1;29:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.022.
8
A Health Economics Approach to US Value Frameworks: Serving the Needs of Decision Making.一种适用于美国价值框架的卫生经济学方法:满足决策需求。
Value Health. 2018 Feb;21(2):117-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.005.
9
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--Emerging Good Practices: Report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force.用于医疗保健决策的多标准决策分析——新兴良好实践:ISPOR多标准决策分析新兴良好实践工作组报告2
Value Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;19(2):125-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.016. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
10
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force.用于医疗保健决策的多标准决策分析——简介:ISPOR多标准决策分析新兴良好实践工作组报告1
Value Health. 2016 Jan;19(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.003. Epub 2016 Jan 8.