• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阅读中文句子时,知觉广度取决于字体大小。

Perceptual span depends on font size during the reading of Chinese sentences.

作者信息

Yan Ming, Zhou Wei, Shu Hua, Kliegl Reinhold

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam.

Beijing Key Lab of Learning and Cognition, Department of Psychology, Capital Normal University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Jan;41(1):209-19. doi: 10.1037/a0038097. Epub 2014 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1037/a0038097
PMID:25329081
Abstract

The present study explored the perceptual span (i.e., the physical extent of an area from which useful visual information is extracted during a single fixation) during the reading of Chinese sentences in 2 experiments. In Experiment 1, we tested whether the rightward span can go beyond 3 characters when visually similar masks were used. Results showed that Chinese readers needed at least 4 characters to the right of fixation to maintain a normal reading behavior when visually similar masks were used and when characters were displayed in small fonts, indicating that the span is dynamically influenced by masking materials. In Experiments 2 and 3, we asked whether the perceptual span varies as a function of font size in spaced (German) and unspaced (Chinese) scripts. Results clearly suggest perceptual span depends on font size in Chinese, but we failed to find such evidence for German. We propose that the perceptual span in Chinese is flexible; it is strongly constrained by its language-specific properties such as high information density and lack of word spacing. Implications for saccade-target selection during the reading of Chinese sentences are discussed.

摘要

本研究通过两个实验探究了中文句子阅读过程中的感知跨度(即单次注视时从中提取有用视觉信息的区域的物理范围)。在实验1中,我们测试了在使用视觉上相似的掩蔽物时,向右的跨度是否能超过3个字符。结果表明,当使用视觉上相似的掩蔽物且字符以小字体显示时,中文读者在注视点右侧至少需要4个字符才能维持正常的阅读行为,这表明跨度受到掩蔽材料的动态影响。在实验2和实验3中,我们探讨了感知跨度是否会因间隔书写(德语)和无间隔书写(中文)的字体大小而变化。结果清楚地表明,中文的感知跨度取决于字体大小,但我们未在德语中找到此类证据。我们提出,中文的感知跨度是灵活的;它受到其特定语言属性的强烈限制,如高信息密度和缺乏单词间隔。文中还讨论了中文句子阅读过程中扫视目标选择的相关影响。

相似文献

1
Perceptual span depends on font size during the reading of Chinese sentences.阅读中文句子时,知觉广度取决于字体大小。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Jan;41(1):209-19. doi: 10.1037/a0038097. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
2
Eye movements of second language learners when reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text.第二语言学习者阅读有空格和无空格中文文本时的眼球运动。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2012 Jun;18(2):192-202. doi: 10.1037/a0027485. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
3
Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: evidence from eye movements.阅读带空格和不带空格的中文文本:来自眼动的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Oct;34(5):1277-87. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1277.
4
Beyond the leftward limit of the perceptual span: Parafoveal processing to the left of fixation in Chinese reading.超出知觉广度的左边界:中文阅读中注视点左侧的副中央凹加工
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Nov;80(8):1873-1878. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1599-3.
5
Parafoveal-on-foveal effects of emotional word semantics in reading Chinese sentences: evidence from eye movements.阅读中文句子时情绪词语义的中央凹旁对中央凹的影响:来自眼动的证据
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Jul;41(4):1237-43. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000095. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
6
Perceptual span is independent of font size for older and young readers: Evidence from Chinese.感知广度与字体大小无关,无论对于老年人还是年轻人:来自中文的证据。
Psychol Aging. 2020 Nov;35(7):1026-1040. doi: 10.1037/pag0000549. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
7
Effects of anomalous characters and small stroke omissions on eye movements during the reading of Chinese sentences.汉语句子阅读中异常字符和笔画少量缺失对眼动的影响。
Ergonomics. 2014;57(11):1659-69. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.945492. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
8
Investigating word length effects in Chinese reading.探究中文阅读中的词长效应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Dec;44(12):1831-1841. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000589.
9
Font size modulates saccade-target selection in Chinese reading.字体大小在中文阅读中调节扫视目标选择。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Feb;73(2):482-90. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0029-y.
10
Revealing similarities in the perceptual span of young and older Chinese readers.揭示年轻和老年中国读者感知广度的相似之处。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Aug;73(8):1189-1205. doi: 10.1177/1747021819899826. Epub 2020 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Driving Factors in the Development of Eye Movement Patterns in Chinese Reading: The Roles of Linguistic Ability and Oculomotor Maturation.中文阅读中眼动模式发展的驱动因素:语言能力和动眼成熟的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 26;15(4):426. doi: 10.3390/bs15040426.
2
The Beijing Sentence Corpus II: A cross-script comparison between traditional and simplified Chinese sentence reading.《北京句子语料库II:繁体中文与简体中文句子阅读的跨文字比较》
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jan 17;57(2):60. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02523-z.
3
A corpus of Chinese word segmentation agreement.
一个中文分词一致性语料库。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 28;57(1):25. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02528-8.
4
Printing words in alternating colors facilitates eye movements among young and older Chinese adults.用交替颜色打印单词有助于中国年轻人和老年人的眼球运动。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Apr;32(2):855-865. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02581-6. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
5
Parafoveal letter identification in Russian: Confusion matrices based on error rates.俄文旁视字母识别:基于错误率的混淆矩阵。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8567-8587. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02492-3. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
6
Does the Processing Advantage of Formulaic Language Persist in Its Nonadjacent Forms? Evidence from Eye Movements of Chinese Collocations.公式语言的加工优势是否在其非相邻形式中持续存在?来自汉语搭配的眼动证据。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2024 Mar 12;53(2):28. doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10040-5.
7
Shared translation in second language activates unrelated words in first language.第二语言的共享翻译会激活第一语言中的不相关词汇。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Jun;31(3):1245-1255. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02405-z. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
8
Effect of habitual reading direction on saccadic eye movements: A pilot study.习惯性阅读方向对眼跳运动的影响:一项初步研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 2;18(6):e0286801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286801. eCollection 2023.
9
Is learning a logographic script easier than reading an alphabetic script for German children with dyslexia?对于有阅读障碍的德国儿童来说,学习表意文字比学习拼音文字更容易吗?
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0282200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282200. eCollection 2023.
10
The Beijing Sentence Corpus: A Chinese sentence corpus with eye movement data and predictability norms.北京句子语料库:具有眼动数据和可预测性规范的中文句子语料库。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Aug;54(4):1989-2000. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01730-2. Epub 2021 Nov 23.