Di Minin Enrico, Laitila Jussi, Montesino-Pouzols Federico, Leader-Williams Nigel, Slotow Rob, Goodman Peter S, Conway Anthony J, Moilanen Atte
Finnish Centre of Excellence in Metapopulation Biology, Department of Biosciences, P.O. Box 65, FI-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland; School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 4041, South Africa.
Conserv Biol. 2015 Apr;29(2):545-55. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12412. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
Between 1990 and 2007, 15 southern white (Ceratotherium simum simum) and black (Diceros bicornis) rhinoceroses on average were killed illegally every year in South Africa. Since 2007 illegal killing of southern white rhinoceros for their horn has escalated to >950 individuals/year in 2013. We conducted an ecological-economic analysis to determine whether a legal trade in southern white rhinoceros horn could facilitate rhinoceros protection. Generalized linear models were used to examine the socioeconomic drivers of poaching, based on data collected from 1990 to 2013, and to project the total number of rhinoceroses likely to be illegally killed from 2014 to 2023. Rhinoceros population dynamics were then modeled under 8 different policy scenarios that could be implemented to control poaching. We also estimated the economic costs and benefits of each scenario under enhanced enforcement only and a legal trade in rhinoceros horn and used a decision support framework to rank the scenarios with the objective of maintaining the rhinoceros population above its current size while generating profit for local stakeholders. The southern white rhinoceros population was predicted to go extinct in the wild <20 years under present management. The optimal scenario to maintain the rhinoceros population above its current size was to provide a medium increase in antipoaching effort and to increase the monetary fine on conviction. Without legalizing the trade, implementing such a scenario would require covering costs equal to approximately $147,000,000/year. With a legal trade in rhinoceros horn, the conservation enterprise could potentially make a profit of $717,000,000/year. We believe the 35-year-old ban on rhinoceros horn products should not be lifted unless the money generated from trade is reinvested in improved protection of the rhinoceros population. Because current protection efforts seem to be failing, it is time to evaluate, discuss, and test alternatives to the present policy.
1990年至2007年期间,南非每年平均有15头南方白犀(白犀指名亚种)和黑犀被非法猎杀。自2007年以来,因犀牛角而非法猎杀南方白犀的行为在2013年已升级至每年超过950头。我们进行了一项生态经济分析,以确定南方白犀犀牛角的合法贸易是否有助于犀牛保护。基于1990年至2013年收集的数据,使用广义线性模型来研究偷猎的社会经济驱动因素,并预测2014年至2023年可能被非法猎杀的犀牛总数。然后在可实施的8种不同政策情景下对犀牛种群动态进行建模,以控制偷猎行为。我们还估计了仅加强执法和犀牛角合法贸易这两种情景下每种情景的经济成本和收益,并使用决策支持框架对这些情景进行排名,目标是使犀牛种群数量维持在当前规模以上,同时为当地利益相关者创造利润。在目前的管理方式下,南方白犀种群预计将在不到20年的时间里在野外灭绝。维持犀牛种群数量高于当前规模的最佳情景是适度增加反偷猎力度,并提高定罪后的罚款金额。如果不将贸易合法化,实施这样的情景每年需要支付约1.47亿美元的费用。如果犀牛角进行合法贸易,保护企业每年可能盈利7.17亿美元。我们认为,除非将贸易所得资金重新投入到加强犀牛种群保护中,否则不应解除已有35年历史的犀牛角制品禁令。由于目前的保护措施似乎正在失效,是时候评估、讨论并测试现行政策的替代方案了。