Adams William M, Aveling Ros, Brockington Dan, Dickson Barney, Elliott Jo, Hutton Jon, Roe Dilys, Vira Bhaskar, Wolmer William
Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EN, UK.
Science. 2004 Nov 12;306(5699):1146-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1097920.
It is widely accepted that biodiversity loss and poverty are linked problems and that conservation and poverty reduction should be tackled together. However, success with integrated strategies is elusive. There is sharp debate about the social impacts of conservation programs and the success of community-based approaches to conservation. Clear conceptual frameworks are needed if policies in these two areas are to be combined. We review the links between poverty alleviation and biodiversity conservation and present a conceptual typology of these relationships.
生物多样性丧失与贫困是相互关联的问题,保护生物多样性与减少贫困应共同应对,这一观点已被广泛接受。然而,综合策略的成功却难以实现。关于保护项目的社会影响以及基于社区的保护方法的成效,存在激烈的争论。若要将这两个领域的政策结合起来,就需要清晰的概念框架。我们审视了扶贫与生物多样性保护之间的联系,并提出了这些关系的概念类型。