• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为了推动科学更好地发展，需要一种更强大的发表后文化。

A stronger post-publication culture is needed for better science.

作者信息

Bastian Hilda

机构信息

Scientist and Editor, National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2014 Dec 30;11(12):e1001772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001772. eCollection 2014 Dec.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001772
PMID:25548904
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4280106/
Abstract

Hilda Bastian considers post-publication commenting and the cultural changes that are needed to better capture this intellectual effort. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

摘要

希尔达·巴斯蒂安探讨了发表后评论以及为更好地记录这种学术成果所需的文化变革。编辑总结请见本文后文。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c3b/4280106/73c2d61ab215/pmed.1001772.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c3b/4280106/73c2d61ab215/pmed.1001772.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c3b/4280106/73c2d61ab215/pmed.1001772.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A stronger post-publication culture is needed for better science.为了推动科学更好地发展，需要一种更强大的发表后文化。
PLoS Med. 2014 Dec 30;11(12):e1001772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001772. eCollection 2014 Dec.
2
How to make more published research true.如何让更多已发表的研究成果真实可靠。
PLoS Med. 2014 Oct 21;11(10):e1001747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747. eCollection 2014 Oct.
3
Editors' response to concerns over the publication of the Cochrane HPV vaccine review was incomplete and ignored important evidence of bias.编辑们对有关Cochrane人乳头瘤病毒疫苗综述发表问题的担忧回应并不完整，且忽视了存在偏见的重要证据。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2019 Feb;24(1):1-4. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111108. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
4
Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international survey.科学期刊编辑对出版伦理的看法：一项国际调查结果
J Med Ethics. 2009 Jun;35(6):348-53. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.028324.
5
[Lysenkoism in Polish botany].[波兰植物学中的李森科主义]
Kwart Hist Nauki Tech. 2008;53(2):83-161.
6
[What is a scientific publication? On science and cultural hierarchies in medical research].[什么是科学出版物？论医学研究中的科学与文化层次]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1992 Feb 20;112(5):673-5.
7
Problems with traditional science publishing and finding a wider niche for post-publication peer review.传统科学出版存在的问题以及为发表后同行评审寻找更广阔的空间。
Account Res. 2015;22(1):22-40. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.899909.
8
Proposed central publication of scientific papers.提议科学论文进行集中发表。
Nature. 1948 Jun 5;161(4101):896. doi: 10.1038/161896a0.
9
Proposed central publication of scientific papers.提议科学论文集中发表。
Nature. 1948 May 22;161(4099):799. doi: 10.1038/161799c0.
10
Publication of Rind et al. (1998). The editors' perspective.林德等人（1998年）的出版物。编辑的观点。
Am Psychol. 2002 Mar;57(3):206-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-publication critique at top-ranked journals across scientific disciplines: a cross-sectional assessment of policies and practice.跨学科顶级期刊发表后评论：政策与实践的横断面评估
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Aug 24;9(8):220139. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220139. eCollection 2022 Aug.
2
Laser-based refractive surgery techniques to treat myopia in adults. An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.基于激光的屈光手术技术治疗成年人近视。系统评价和荟萃分析概述。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;100(8):878-893. doi: 10.1111/aos.15160. Epub 2022 May 9.
3
Understanding the nature and scope of clinical research commentaries in PubMed.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender differences in conference presentations: a consequence of self-selection?会议报告中的性别差异：是自我选择的结果吗？
PeerJ. 2014 Oct 21;2:e627. doi: 10.7717/peerj.627. eCollection 2014.
2
How to make more published research true.如何让更多已发表的研究成果真实可靠。
PLoS Med. 2014 Oct 21;11(10):e1001747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747. eCollection 2014 Oct.
3
Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study.同行评审对开放同行评审期刊上发表的随机试验报告的影响：前后对比的回顾性研究。
理解 PubMed 中临床研究评论的性质和范围。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Mar 1;27(3):449-456. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz209.
4
Open collaborative writing with Manubot.使用 Manubot 进行开放式协作写作。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Jun 24;15(6):e1007128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128. eCollection 2019 Jun.
5
Editorial Processes in Free Open Access Medical Educational (FOAM) Resources.免费开放获取医学教育（FOAM）资源中的编辑流程。
AEM Educ Train. 2018 May 1;2(3):204-212. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10097. eCollection 2018 Jul.
6
Beyond the Impact Factor - What do alternative metrics have to offer?超越影响因子——替代计量指标能提供什么？
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 May 15;34(2):Doc27. doi: 10.3205/zma001104. eCollection 2017.
7
A post-publication analysis of the idealized upper reference value of 2.5 mIU/L for TSH: Time to support the thyroid axis with magnesium and iron especially in the setting of reproduction medicine.对促甲状腺激素（TSH）理想上限参考值2.5 mIU/L进行的发表后分析：是时候用镁和铁来支持甲状腺轴了，尤其是在生殖医学领域。
BBA Clin. 2017 Mar 19;7:115-119. doi: 10.1016/j.bbacli.2017.03.003. eCollection 2017 Jun.
8
Systemic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic imaging technologies.诊断成像技术的系统评价与荟萃分析
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2016 Oct;6(5):615-618. doi: 10.21037/qims.2016.10.08.
9
Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior.强化发表后同行评审的纠正性质：识别弱点、利用期刊俱乐部以及奖励尽责行为。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Aug;23(4):1213-1226. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9854-2. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
10
Reproducibility and transparency in biomedical sciences.生物医学科学中的可重复性和透明度。
Oral Dis. 2017 Oct;23(7):813-816. doi: 10.1111/odi.12588. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
BMJ. 2014 Jul 1;349:g4145. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4145.
4
Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide.更好的干预措施报告：干预描述和复制（TIDieR）清单和指南模板。
BMJ. 2014 Mar 7;348:g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.
5
Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility.政策：NIH 计划提高可重复性。
Nature. 2014 Jan 30;505(7485):612-3. doi: 10.1038/505612a.
6
Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research.减少生物医学研究中不完整或无法使用的报告所造成的浪费。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):267-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62228-X. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
7
Bibliometrics: global gender disparities in science.文献计量学：科学领域的全球性别差异
Nature. 2013 Dec 12;504(7479):211-3. doi: 10.1038/504211a.
8
Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol).系统评价培训计划在学术出版物写作、期刊编辑和稿件同行评审方面的有效性（方案）。
Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 17;2:41. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-41.
9
Getting closer to a fully correctable and connected research literature.越来越接近完全可纠正和互联的研究文献。
PLoS Med. 2013;10(3):e1001408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001408. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
10
Does Gender Matter in Grant Peer Review?: An Empirical Investigation Using the Example of the Austrian Science Fund.科研基金同行评审中性别重要吗？以奥地利科学基金为例的实证研究
Z Psychol. 2012;220(2):121-129. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000103.