Bonafede Machaon M, Miller Jeffrey D, Laughlin-Tommaso Shannon K, Lukes Andrea S, Meyer Nicole M, Lenhart Gregory M
Truven Health Analytics, Cambridge MA, USA.
Mayo Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rochester, MN, USA.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Oct 8;6:423-9. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S67888. eCollection 2014.
Women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) may be treated surgically with hysterectomy or global endometrial ablation (GEA), an outpatient procedure. We compared the costs and clinical outcomes of these surgical procedures for AUB among women in Medicaid programs.
The Truven Health MarketScan(®) Medicaid Multi-State Database was used to identify Medicaid women aged 30-55 years with AUB who newly initiated GEA or hysterectomy (index event) during 2006-2010. Patients were required to have 12 months of continuous enrollment pre-index and post-index. Baseline characteristics were assessed in the pre-index period; health care utilization and costs (2011 USD), treatment complications, and reinterventions were assessed in the post-index period.
Of 1,880 women who met the study criteria (mean age 40.7 years), 53.4% were Caucasian, 33.1% were African-American, and 2.3% were Hispanic; many (42.8%) received their Medicaid eligibility due to disability. Similar proportions received GEA (50.9%) or hysterectomy (49.1%). At baseline, both groups also had similar Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity scores (0.65), and use of antibiotics (69.4%), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (56.3%), and oral contraceptives (5.3%). More hysterectomy patients than GEA patients had a treatment-related complication (52% versus 36%, respectively, P<0.001). Initial treatment costs were higher for hysterectomy ($11,270) than for GEA ($3,958, P<0.001); monthly gynecology-related costs in the remainder of the year were not significantly different for hysterectomy ($63) and GEA ($16, P=0.11).
Hysterectomy was nearly three times more costly than GEA for initial treatment of AUB, and associated with more treatment-related complications. These results may be informative in the context of new federal mandates for Medicaid expansion, which are likely to focus on cost savings through use of outpatient treatments such as GEA.
子宫异常出血(AUB)的女性患者可通过子宫切除术或子宫内膜整体切除术(GEA,一种门诊手术)进行手术治疗。我们比较了医疗补助计划女性患者中这些AUB手术治疗的成本和临床结局。
利用Truven Health MarketScan®医疗补助多州数据库,确定2006年至2010年期间新接受GEA或子宫切除术(索引事件)的30至55岁医疗补助AUB女性患者。要求患者在索引前后连续参保12个月。在索引前阶段评估基线特征;在索引后阶段评估医疗保健利用情况和成本(2011美元)、治疗并发症及再次干预情况。
在1880名符合研究标准的女性患者(平均年龄40.7岁)中,53.4%为白种人,33.1%为非裔美国人,2.3%为西班牙裔;许多患者(42.8%)因残疾获得医疗补助资格。接受GEA(50.9%)或子宫切除术(49.1%)的比例相似。基线时,两组的Deyo-Charlson合并症评分(0.65)以及抗生素(69.4%)、非甾体抗炎药(56.3%)和口服避孕药(5.3%)的使用情况也相似。子宫切除术患者发生治疗相关并发症的比例高于GEA患者(分别为52%和36%,P<0.001)。子宫切除术的初始治疗成本(11,270美元)高于GEA(3,958美元,P<0.001);子宫切除术(63美元)和GEA(16美元,P = 0.11)在该年剩余时间的每月妇科相关成本无显著差异。
对于AUB的初始治疗,子宫切除术的成本几乎是GEA的三倍,且与更多治疗相关并发症相关。在新的联邦医疗补助扩大授权背景下,这些结果可能具有参考价值,新授权可能侧重于通过使用GEA等门诊治疗来节省成本。