Oliveira Susana Maria, Teixeira Nuno José, Fernandes Lisete, Teles Pedro, Vaz Pedro
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campo Mártires da Pátria, 130, 1169-056 Lisbon, Portugal ; Quadrantes Faro - Unidade de Radioterapia do Algarve, Rua da Associação Oncológica do Algarve, 8000-316 Faro, Portugal ; MedicalConsult, SA, Campo Grande, 56-8°A, 1700-093 Lisbon, Portugal.
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campo Mártires da Pátria, 130, 1169-056 Lisbon, Portugal ; Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Av. D. João II, lote 4.69.01, 1900-096 Lisbon, Portugal.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2014 Apr 16;19(6):392-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.03.004. eCollection 2014 Nov.
To use Monte Carlo (MC) together with voxel phantoms to analyze the tissue heterogeneity effect in the dose distributions and equivalent uniform dose (EUD) for (125)I prostate implants.
Dose distribution calculations in low dose-rate brachytherapy are based on the dose deposition around a single source in a water phantom. This formalism does not take into account tissue heterogeneities, interseed attenuation, or finite patient dimensions effects. Tissue composition is especially important due to the photoelectric effect.
The computed tomographies (CT) of two patients with prostate cancer were used to create voxel phantoms for the MC simulations. An elemental composition and density were assigned to each structure. Densities of the prostate, vesicles, rectum and bladder were determined through the CT electronic densities of 100 patients. The same simulations were performed considering the same phantom as pure water. Results were compared via dose-volume histograms and EUD for the prostate and rectum.
The mean absorbed doses presented deviations of 3.3-4.0% for the prostate and of 2.3-4.9% for the rectum, when comparing calculations in water with calculations in the heterogeneous phantom. In the calculations in water, the prostate D 90 was overestimated by 2.8-3.9% and the rectum D 0.1cc resulted in dose differences of 6-8%. The EUD resulted in an overestimation of 3.5-3.7% for the prostate and of 7.7-8.3% for the rectum.
The deposited dose was consistently overestimated for the simulation in water. In order to increase the accuracy in the determination of dose distributions, especially around the rectum, the introduction of the model-based algorithms is recommended.
运用蒙特卡罗(MC)方法结合体素模型,分析¹²⁵I前列腺植入治疗中剂量分布和等效均匀剂量(EUD)的组织异质性效应。
低剂量率近距离放射治疗中的剂量分布计算基于水模中单个源周围的剂量沉积。这种形式未考虑组织异质性、粒子间衰减或有限患者尺寸效应。由于光电效应,组织组成尤为重要。
利用两名前列腺癌患者的计算机断层扫描(CT)数据创建体素模型用于MC模拟。为每个结构赋予元素组成和密度。通过100名患者的CT电子密度确定前列腺、精囊、直肠和膀胱的密度。将相同模型视为纯水进行相同模拟。通过前列腺和直肠的剂量体积直方图及EUD比较结果。
与非均匀模型计算相比,水模计算中前列腺的平均吸收剂量偏差为3.3 - 4.0%,直肠为2.3 - 4.9%。在水模计算中,前列腺D90被高估2.8 - 3.9%,直肠D0.1cc导致剂量差异为6 - 8%。EUD方面,前列腺高估3.5 - 3.7%,直肠高估7.7 - 8.3%。
水模模拟的沉积剂量一直被高估。为提高剂量分布测定的准确性,尤其是直肠周围,建议引入基于模型算法。