Suppr超能文献

降钙素原与C反应蛋白:在ICU患者中作为脓毒症生物标志物的效用

Procalcitonin versus C-reactive protein: Usefulness as biomarker of sepsis in ICU patient.

作者信息

Nargis Waheeda, Ibrahim Md, Ahamed Borhan Uddin

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry, Uttara Adhunik Medical College Hospital, Uttara, Bangladesh.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Apollo Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

出版信息

Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2014 Jul;4(3):195-9. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.141356.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis and appropriate therapy of sepsis is a daily challenge in intensive care units (ICUs) despite the advances in critical care medicine. Procalcitonin (PCT); an innovative laboratory marker, has been recently proven valuable worldwide in this regard.

OBJECTIVES

This study was undertaken to evaluate the utility of PCT in a resource constrained country like ours when compared to the traditional inflammatory markers like C - reactive protein (CRP) to introduce PCT as a routine biochemical tool in regional hospitals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PCT and CRP were simultaneously measured and compared in 73 medico-surgical ICU patients according to the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) criteria based study groups.

RESULTS

The clinical presentation of 75% cases revealed a range of systemic inflammatory responses (SIRS). The diagnostic accuracy of PCT was higher (75%) with greater specificity (72%), sensitivity (76%), positive and negative predictive values (89% and 50%), positive likelihood ratio (2.75) as well as the smaller negative likelihood ratio (0.33). Both serum PCT and CRP values in cases with sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock were significantly higher from that of the cases with SIRS and no SIRS (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

PCT is found to be superior to CRP in terms of accuracy in identification and to assess the severity of sepsis even though both markers cannot be used in differentiating infectious from noninfectious clinical syndrome.

摘要

背景

尽管重症医学取得了进展,但脓毒症的早期诊断和适当治疗仍是重症监护病房(ICU)日常面临的挑战。降钙素原(PCT)作为一种创新的实验室指标,最近在全球范围内已被证明在这方面具有重要价值。

目的

本研究旨在评估在像我们这样资源有限的国家中,与传统炎症指标如C反应蛋白(CRP)相比,PCT在将其作为地区医院常规生化工具引入时的效用。

材料与方法

根据美国胸科医师学会(ACCP)标准研究组,对73例内科-外科ICU患者同时测量并比较PCT和CRP。

结果

75%病例的临床表现显示出一系列全身炎症反应(SIRS)。PCT的诊断准确性更高(75%),具有更高的特异性(72%)、敏感性(76%)、阳性和阴性预测值(89%和50%)、阳性似然比(2.75)以及更小的阴性似然比(0.33)。脓毒症、严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克病例的血清PCT和CRP值均显著高于SIRS和无SIRS病例(P < 0.01)。

结论

尽管两种指标都不能用于区分感染性与非感染性临床综合征,但在识别准确性和评估脓毒症严重程度方面,PCT优于CRP。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b0/4200544/743abd423a4a/IJCIIS-4-195-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Procalcitonin versus C-reactive protein: Usefulness as biomarker of sepsis in ICU patient.
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2014 Jul;4(3):195-9. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.141356.
2
Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as markers of systemic inflammatory response syndrome severity in critically ill children.
Intensive Care Med. 2007 Mar;33(3):477-84. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0509-7. Epub 2007 Jan 27.
4
The efficacy of procalcitonin as a biomarker in the management of sepsis: slaying dragons or tilting at windmills?
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2013 Dec;14(6):489-511. doi: 10.1089/sur.2012.028. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
5
Procalcitonin: a valuable indicator of infection in a medical ICU?
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Sep;26(9):1232-8. doi: 10.1007/s001340000580.
8
Comparison of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as markers of sepsis.
Crit Care Med. 2003 Jun;31(6):1737-41. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000063440.19188.ED.
9
[Combined prognostic value of serum lactic acid, procalcitonin and severity score for short-term prognosis of septic shock patients].
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):281-285. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201113-00715.
10
Procalcitonin as a marker of sepsis and outcome in patients with neurotrauma: an observation study.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2013 Dec 15;13(1):48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-13-48.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of Biomarkers in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis.
J Orthop Case Rep. 2025 Sep;15(9):342-347. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i09.6120.
5
Role of C-reactive Protein and Procalcitonin in Early Diagnostic Accuracy and Their Prognostic Significance in Sepsis.
Cureus. 2024 Sep 27;16(9):e70358. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70358. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
Procalcitonin and qSOFA as a Marker of Mortality in Sepsis.
Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2024;19(3):196-203. doi: 10.2174/0115748871288534240322083746.
8
Prognosis prediction of procalcitonin within 24 h for acute diquat poisoning.
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Apr 14;24(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00975-2.
9
Evaluation of circulating levels of miR-135a and miR-193 in patients with sepsis.
Mol Biol Rep. 2024 Feb 7;51(1):282. doi: 10.1007/s11033-024-09225-x.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Role of serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis.
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2011 Aug;37(2):40-6. doi: 10.3329/bmrcb.v37i2.8432.
5
Inflammation markers in point-of-care testing (POCT).
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2009 Mar;393(5):1473-80. doi: 10.1007/s00216-008-2561-3. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
6
Diagnostic efficacy and prognostic value of serum procalcitonin concentration in patients with suspected sepsis.
J Intensive Care Med. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):63-71. doi: 10.1177/0885066608327095. Epub 2008 Dec 2.
7
Usefulness of procalcitonin serum level for the discrimination of severe sepsis from sepsis: a multicenter prospective study.
J Infect Chemother. 2008 Jun;14(3):244-9. doi: 10.1007/s10156-008-0608-1. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
8
Procalcitonin assay in systemic inflammation, infection, and sepsis: clinical utility and limitations.
Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar;36(3):941-52. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0B013E318165BABB.
10
Accuracy of procalcitonin for sepsis diagnosis in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Mar;7(3):210-7. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70052-X.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验