Nargis Waheeda, Ibrahim Md, Ahamed Borhan Uddin
Department of Biochemistry, Uttara Adhunik Medical College Hospital, Uttara, Bangladesh.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Apollo Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2014 Jul;4(3):195-9. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.141356.
Early diagnosis and appropriate therapy of sepsis is a daily challenge in intensive care units (ICUs) despite the advances in critical care medicine. Procalcitonin (PCT); an innovative laboratory marker, has been recently proven valuable worldwide in this regard.
This study was undertaken to evaluate the utility of PCT in a resource constrained country like ours when compared to the traditional inflammatory markers like C - reactive protein (CRP) to introduce PCT as a routine biochemical tool in regional hospitals.
PCT and CRP were simultaneously measured and compared in 73 medico-surgical ICU patients according to the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) criteria based study groups.
The clinical presentation of 75% cases revealed a range of systemic inflammatory responses (SIRS). The diagnostic accuracy of PCT was higher (75%) with greater specificity (72%), sensitivity (76%), positive and negative predictive values (89% and 50%), positive likelihood ratio (2.75) as well as the smaller negative likelihood ratio (0.33). Both serum PCT and CRP values in cases with sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock were significantly higher from that of the cases with SIRS and no SIRS (P < 0.01).
PCT is found to be superior to CRP in terms of accuracy in identification and to assess the severity of sepsis even though both markers cannot be used in differentiating infectious from noninfectious clinical syndrome.
尽管重症医学取得了进展,但脓毒症的早期诊断和适当治疗仍是重症监护病房(ICU)日常面临的挑战。降钙素原(PCT)作为一种创新的实验室指标,最近在全球范围内已被证明在这方面具有重要价值。
本研究旨在评估在像我们这样资源有限的国家中,与传统炎症指标如C反应蛋白(CRP)相比,PCT在将其作为地区医院常规生化工具引入时的效用。
根据美国胸科医师学会(ACCP)标准研究组,对73例内科-外科ICU患者同时测量并比较PCT和CRP。
75%病例的临床表现显示出一系列全身炎症反应(SIRS)。PCT的诊断准确性更高(75%),具有更高的特异性(72%)、敏感性(76%)、阳性和阴性预测值(89%和50%)、阳性似然比(2.75)以及更小的阴性似然比(0.33)。脓毒症、严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克病例的血清PCT和CRP值均显著高于SIRS和无SIRS病例(P < 0.01)。
尽管两种指标都不能用于区分感染性与非感染性临床综合征,但在识别准确性和评估脓毒症严重程度方面,PCT优于CRP。