Rauniyar Navin, Yates John R
Department of Chemical Physiology, The Scripps Research Institute , 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.
J Proteome Res. 2014 Dec 5;13(12):5293-309. doi: 10.1021/pr500880b. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
Mass spectrometry plays a key role in relative quantitative comparisons of proteins in order to understand their functional role in biological systems upon perturbation. In this review, we review studies that examine different aspects of isobaric labeling-based relative quantification for shotgun proteomic analysis. In particular, we focus on different types of isobaric reagents and their reaction chemistry (e.g., amine-, carbonyl-, and sulfhydryl-reactive). Various factors, such as ratio compression, reporter ion dynamic range, and others, cause an underestimation of changes in relative abundance of proteins across samples, undermining the ability of the isobaric labeling approach to be truly quantitative. These factors that affect quantification and the suggested combinations of experimental design and optimal data acquisition methods to increase the precision and accuracy of the measurements will be discussed. Finally, the extended application of isobaric labeling-based approach in hyperplexing strategy, targeted quantification, and phosphopeptide analysis are also examined.
为了理解蛋白质在生物系统受到扰动时的功能作用,质谱在蛋白质的相对定量比较中起着关键作用。在本综述中,我们回顾了研究基于等压标记的相对定量在鸟枪法蛋白质组分析中不同方面的研究。特别是,我们关注不同类型的等压试剂及其反应化学(例如,胺反应性、羰基反应性和巯基反应性)。各种因素,如比率压缩、报告离子动态范围等,会导致跨样本蛋白质相对丰度变化的低估,从而削弱等压标记方法进行真正定量的能力。将讨论这些影响定量的因素以及为提高测量精度和准确性而建议的实验设计和最佳数据采集方法的组合。最后,还研究了基于等压标记的方法在超多重策略、靶向定量和磷酸肽分析中的扩展应用。